document-by-id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It implies a read-only retrieval operation (조회합니다). It adds context about special id=0 behavior but does not disclose other traits such as error handling, rate limits, or output format. Adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (3 sentences), front-loaded with the main purpose, and structured with a clear usage scenario. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple single-parameter retrieval tool, the description covers the main purpose, usage context, and a key special case. It references sibling tool get-docs for search. Lacks details about output format but is sufficient given no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a basic description. The description adds value by explaining the special meaning of id=0 (list all IDs), which is not in the schema. This enhances parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves entire documentation for a specific integration by ID, and distinguishes from sibling tool get-docs by specifying that get-docs is for search results while this tool gets full content. It also explains the special id=0 behavior for listing IDs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells when to use: when full content from get-docs search results is needed. It also provides usage guidance for id=0 to list IDs. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or list alternatives beyond get-docs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.