hedgedoc-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to hedgedoc-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with self-hosted HedgeDoc 1.x, enabling AI agents to create, read, update, and manage notes via session-cookie authentication with automatic re-login.61MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, search, create, and append Markdown notes from a local vault (e.g., Obsidian) via MCP, allowing natural-language note management through compatible clients.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to create, list, search, and delete notes, read all notes as markdown, and use prompts to summarize or clean up notes.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to list, read, search, create, update, rename, and delete markdown notes in a local Obsidian vault via an HTTP MCP endpoint.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with a local Mermaid diagram editor via MCP, allowing them to get and set diagrams programmatically.15,151,633 npm13Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA secure, multi-tenant MCP server that proxies AI assistant requests to the HedgeDoc API, exposing 27 tools for full CRUD operations and permission management across notes, media, and profiles.GPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
The four create variants are distinct in their parameters (blank, content, alias, diagram), but create and create_with_alias are nearly identical except for the alias parameter, which could cause confusion. The remaining tools (read, info, status, revisions, URLs) are clearly differentiated by action.
All tools share the hedgedoc_ prefix, and most follow a verb-based pattern. However, there is inconsistency: some are plain verbs (create, read), some are nouns (info, status), some are verb_noun (publish_url, list_revisions), and the create variants use a create_<variant> pattern. This is mostly predictable but not perfectly uniform.
With 11 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of note management, and the count is within the ideal range for a domain-specific MCP server.
The server provides strong coverage for creating and reading notes, but lacks update and delete operations, making it impossible to modify or remove notes. Additionally, there is no list-notes tool, so agents must know note IDs in advance, leaving significant gaps in the note lifecycle.