Skip to main content
Glama
Jwrede

tokentoll

by Jwrede
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to tokentoll

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • TokenOracle MCP

      VictoryInTech
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Estimates, compares, and controls LLM API costs before agents spend tokens, with tools for cost estimation, model comparison, and budget checking.
      39 npm
      MIT

    • scc-mcp

      NicholasSynovic
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes boyter/scc code counting and complexity analysis to LLM agents via read-only tools like counting lines, finding top files, and cost estimation.
      7
      BSD 3-Clause

    • LLM Usage & Cost Tracker

      zhaoyue722
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first, multi-provider cost meter for LLM usage, exposed as MCP tools. Captures every call into a local SQLite ledger and lets any coding agent query spend, compare providers, and get recommendations — no cloud, no account. First-class support for Chinese providers (Qwen, DeepSeek) alongside Anthropic and OpenAI.
      7
      3
      MIT

    • ai-cost-calculator-api

      lazymac2x
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI cost calculation, comparison, and optimization across major providers like Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, and Mistral. Supports cost estimation, budget-aware model finding, and token estimation through a simple API and MCP integration.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools, diff and scan, have clearly distinct purposes: scan finds LLM call sites and estimates costs, while diff compares costs between git refs. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tool names are single verbs ('diff', 'scan'), which is consistent in style. While not a verb_noun pattern, the naming is uniform and intuitive for the domain.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is very focused. This can be appropriate for a narrow utility, but it feels thin for a full server. A few more tools (e.g., pricing config) might improve scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover two core operations: scanning and diffing. However, there is no tool for managing pricing configurations or listing assumptions, which could be gaps for advanced use.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources