Skip to main content
Glama
JvnnDev

SEO Webmaster MCP

by JvnnDev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to SEO Webmaster MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • IndexScout

      jpow18
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to perform evidence-backed Google Search Console investigations, including traffic change diagnosis, opportunity discovery, cannibalization detection, and indexing audits, all through read-only access.
      MIT

    • google-search-console-mcp

      getmcpads-com
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to query Google Search Console search performance, inspect indexing, analyze sitemaps, and run SEO analyses such as cannibalisation detection, query clustering, and wins/losses, all with read-only access.
      20
      230 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • ai-search-audit

      d08m
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables auditing AI search visibility: checks site readiness for AI crawlers and measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend your site, including verbatim answers and citation gap analysis.
      89 npm
      4
      AGPL 3.0

    • seo-crawler-mcp

      hna2810
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive website SEO analysis including crawling, on-page audits, site structure visualization, and content topic classification with taxonomy mapping.
      7
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are cleanly separated by source prefix (bing_/gsc_) and purpose, but a few pairs overlap: gsc_search_performance vs gsc_query_advanced (both Search Analytics), gsc_search_performance vs gsc_page_performance, and seo_audit_site vs seo_audit_advanced. The descriptions do clarify the distinctions, so confusion is limited but not absent.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are snake_case, which is good, but verb style is inconsistent: some use explicit verbs (get_bing_clicks_and_impressions, gsc_list_sites, bing_list_sites) while most are bare prefix+noun (bing_top_queries, gsc_sitemaps). The source-prefix scheme (bing_/gsc_/seo_/geo_) is a readable secondary pattern, but the mixed verb presence keeps it from being fully predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 25 tools this sits at the heavy end of the acceptable band, and several tools (audit_site/audit_advanced, multiple sitemap and performance variants) feel like they could be consolidated. The count is defensible given dual Bing+GSC coverage but is borderline bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage of the SEO webmaster domain is strong: search performance, sitemaps, crawl stats/issues, backlinks, URL inspection, and audit workflows are present for both Bing and GSC. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no write/mutation operations for sitemap submission), but core read/analysis lifecycle is well covered.

    Resources