SEO Webmaster MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to SEO Webmaster MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to run SEO audits and reporting over a user's own Search Console, Google Analytics, Bing, and keyword/competitor provider data, including page/index status, traffic comparisons, backlinks, and local crawl/internal-link analysis.1,440 npm578Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to perform evidence-backed Google Search Console investigations, including traffic change diagnosis, opportunity discovery, cannibalization detection, and indexing audits, all through read-only access.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to research competitors, keywords, ads, and AI citations, and to audit public websites for SEO, AEO, and GEO readiness with prioritized fixes.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAudits public websites for AI crawler access, public technical signals, and deployment readiness. Includes a focused path to the full readiness report when deeper remediation guidance is needed.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to query Google Search Console search performance, inspect indexing, analyze sitemaps, and run SEO analyses such as cannibalisation detection, query clustering, and wins/losses, all with read-only access.2053 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables auditing AI search visibility: checks site readiness for AI crawlers and measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend your site, including verbatim answers and citation gap analysis.97 npm4AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Most tools are cleanly separated by source prefix (bing_/gsc_) and purpose, but a few pairs overlap: gsc_search_performance vs gsc_query_advanced (both Search Analytics), gsc_search_performance vs gsc_page_performance, and seo_audit_site vs seo_audit_advanced. The descriptions do clarify the distinctions, so confusion is limited but not absent.
All names are snake_case, which is good, but verb style is inconsistent: some use explicit verbs (get_bing_clicks_and_impressions, gsc_list_sites, bing_list_sites) while most are bare prefix+noun (bing_top_queries, gsc_sitemaps). The source-prefix scheme (bing_/gsc_/seo_/geo_) is a readable secondary pattern, but the mixed verb presence keeps it from being fully predictable.
At 25 tools this sits at the heavy end of the acceptable band, and several tools (audit_site/audit_advanced, multiple sitemap and performance variants) feel like they could be consolidated. The count is defensible given dual Bing+GSC coverage but is borderline bloated.
Coverage of the SEO webmaster domain is strong: search performance, sitemaps, crawl stats/issues, backlinks, URL inspection, and audit workflows are present for both Bing and GSC. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no write/mutation operations for sitemap submission), but core read/analysis lifecycle is well covered.