Skip to main content
Glama
SEO Webmaster MCP

SEO Webmaster MCP

by JvnnDev

Related Servers

Alternatives to SEO Webmaster MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run SEO audits and reporting over a user's own Search Console, Google Analytics, Bing, and keyword/competitor provider data, including page/index status, traffic comparisons, backlinks, and local crawl/internal-link analysis.
      4,336 npm
      613
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to perform evidence-backed Google Search Console investigations, including traffic change diagnosis, opportunity discovery, cannibalization detection, and indexing audits, all through read-only access.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to research competitors, keywords, ads, and AI citations, and to audit public websites for SEO, AEO, and GEO readiness with prioritized fixes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to query Google Search Console search performance, inspect indexing, analyze sitemaps, and run SEO analyses such as cannibalisation detection, query clustering, and wins/losses, all with read-only access.
      20
      119 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables auditing AI search visibility: checks site readiness for AI crawlers and measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend your site, including verbatim answers and citation gap analysis.
      90 npm
      4
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The bing_/gsc_ provider prefixes cleanly separate most tools, but several pairs overlap: gsc_search_performance vs gsc_query_advanced vs gsc_page_performance all query Search Analytics, and seo_audit_site vs seo_audit_advanced vs seo_audit_save all perform audits with only subtle differences. Descriptions do the heavy lifting to distinguish them, so an agent can recover but selection errors are likely. Also bing_portal_tools and geo_report_summary feel like odd out-of-band additions to an otherwise analytical set.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    A clear prefix_action convention (bing_*, gsc_*, seo_audit_*) holds across 25 of 29 tools. Violations are minor: get_bing_clicks_and_impressions uses a get_ verb instead of the bing_ prefix, and geo_report_summary is unprefixed.

    Tool Count3/5

    29 tools is heavy, but justified in part by covering two separate provider APIs (Bing + GSC) plus an audit lifecycle. Some entries feel marginal: bing_portal_tools merely returns documentation links, geo_report_summary reads a local CSV, and bing_top_pages/bing_top_queries/bing_page_queries overlap.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: analytics, sitemaps, crawl stats, backlinks, URL inspection, opportunities, and a full audit run/save/list/get/compare lifecycle. Notable gaps: no sitemap submission or URL indexing request for either Bing or GSC, all provider tools are read-only, and geo_report_summary has no sibling tools for managing the CSVs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues