sac_import_oneclick

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only lists the steps without mentioning important details like the need for allowalteration=true to execute, potential data modification, or what is returned (e.g., job ID). This is insufficient for a tool that performs multiple actions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that efficiently communicates the tool's purpose. It is appropriately sized for the complexity, though slightly more detail could be added without harming conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite a detailed input schema, the description omits what the tool returns, prerequisites, or side effects. For a multi-step operation with 7 parameters and no output schema, this is insufficient for complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description need not add much. However, it adds no parameter insights beyond what the schema already defines, resulting in a baseline score of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool combines multiple steps ('create job, upload, validate, run') in one request. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools that perform each step individually (e.g., sac_import_create_job, sac_import_upload_data).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'one-click' implies a simplified workflow for users who want all steps in a single call, but no explicit guidance is given on when to use this versus the individual steps or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.