Skip to main content
Glama
July-Blue-Sky-LLC

CacheTank MCP Server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to CacheTank MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a local, persistent context database for AI tools via MCP, enabling them to recall user preferences, decisions, and experiences across sessions. It is fully local with optional sync, and works with any MCP client.
      581 npm
      Business Source 1.1
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      The personal context layer for AI - one user owned profile plus files, read by any MCP client so you never re-introduce yourself.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides persistent, local-first AI memory across sessions via MCP tools for storing, searching, and retrieving context from past interactions.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a persistent, cross-tool memory layer for AI coding agents via MCP, enabling storage and retrieval of decisions, preferences, and context across different tools and models.
      2 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: 'cache_it' saves a piece of knowledge, while 'fill_tank' retrieves full context. There is no overlap or ambiguity between the two operations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools follow a verb_noun pattern with underscores (cache_it, fill_tank), but 'cache_it' includes the pronoun 'it' instead of a noun, creating a slight inconsistency in structure.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 2 tools, the server is minimal but appropriately scoped for a simple cache/context retrieval purpose. A few more tools (e.g., delete or list) could be useful, but the count is not inappropriate.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers save and retrieve operations, but lacks explicit update or delete functionality, which are notable gaps for full lifecycle management of cached items.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing