CacheTank MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to CacheTank MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides a local, persistent context database for AI tools via MCP, enabling them to recall user preferences, decisions, and experiences across sessions. It is fully local with optional sync, and works with any MCP client.581 npmBusiness Source 1.1
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceThe personal context layer for AI - one user owned profile plus files, read by any MCP client so you never re-introduce yourself.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides persistent, local-first AI memory across sessions via MCP tools for storing, searching, and retrieving context from past interactions.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceShared memory for any MCP-compatible AI, enabling cross-platform knowledge persistence and retrieval so users' context, preferences, and project info follow them everywhere.3AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted personal context layer that gives AI agents shared memory via MCP.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a persistent, cross-tool memory layer for AI coding agents via MCP, enabling storage and retrieval of decisions, preferences, and context across different tools and models.2 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: 'cache_it' saves a piece of knowledge, while 'fill_tank' retrieves full context. There is no overlap or ambiguity between the two operations.
Both tools follow a verb_noun pattern with underscores (cache_it, fill_tank), but 'cache_it' includes the pronoun 'it' instead of a noun, creating a slight inconsistency in structure.
With 2 tools, the server is minimal but appropriately scoped for a simple cache/context retrieval purpose. A few more tools (e.g., delete or list) could be useful, but the count is not inappropriate.
The tool surface covers save and retrieve operations, but lacks explicit update or delete functionality, which are notable gaps for full lifecycle management of cached items.