Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to eu-pii-redact

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Sanitizes text and files by removing PII, secrets, and custom patterns locally before sending to LLMs, with optional reverse-scrubbing.
      3
      328 npm
      2
      Cryptographic Autonomy 1.0 (Combined Work Exception)
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to mask personal data in local Turkish documents by accepting a local file path (TXT, MD, DOCX, or text PDF) and returning pseudonymized text such as [KISI-1] and [TCKN-1] instead of the original values. Tools scan for PII types, produce masked output, and restore real values into a local file without ever returning plaintext to the model.
      4
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop to redact and count personal data in PDFs and images, strip hidden metadata from photos, anonymize Word and text files, prepare watermarked ID copies, and compare contract versions using only user-approved local folders. All processing runs offline on the user's computer, creating new copies instead of modifying or deleting the originals.
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to encrypt and sanitize sensitive data such as credentials, credit card numbers, and addresses locally before dispatching prompts to cloud LLMs, then rehydrate the masked values client-side. It runs deterministically with zero external dependencies over MCP JSON-RPC stdio, so no plaintext PII leaves the user's machine.
      7
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct target and operation: redact_text for text, redact_file for files, restore_file for reversing file redaction. There is no overlap in purpose; an agent can easily select the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (redact_text, redact_file, restore_file). The convention is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools are well-scoped for a focused PII redaction server: one for text, one for files, one for restoration. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Core redaction and file restoration are covered, but redact_text lacks a corresponding restore operation (unlike redact_file), and no batch or structured-data redaction exists. These are minor gaps given the narrow scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues