Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to eu-pii-redact

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to scrub or reversibly tokenize PII and secrets in text and nested JSON before sending prompts to LLMs, then restore the original values from a vault map afterward. Runs locally with no network calls and exposes scrub_text, rehydrate_text, and scrub_json tools.
      3
      40 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to detect and redact PII and secrets in text, HTML, and PDF documents before they reach an LLM, with reversible placeholder, mask, or hash redaction, and to list supported detectors and redaction styles.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Sanitizes text and files by removing PII, secrets, and custom patterns locally before sending to LLMs, with optional reverse-scrubbing.
      3
      303 npm
      124 PyPI
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to mask personal data in local Turkish documents by accepting a local file path (TXT, MD, DOCX, or text PDF) and returning pseudonymized text such as [KISI-1] and [TCKN-1] instead of the original values. Tools scan for PII types, produce masked output, and restore real values into a local file without ever returning plaintext to the model.
      4
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to browse and read files from allowlisted folders while names, IDs, contacts, and secrets are replaced with consistent tokens locally before the agent ever sees them. The agent's final answer can then be restored to the original values locally, with no write tools and no file contents leaving the machine.
      26 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct target and operation: redact_text for text, redact_file for files, restore_file for reversing file redaction. There is no overlap in purpose; an agent can easily select the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (redact_text, redact_file, restore_file). The convention is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools are well-scoped for a focused PII redaction server: one for text, one for files, one for restoration. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Core redaction and file restoration are covered, but redact_text lacks a corresponding restore operation (unlike redact_file), and no batch or structured-data redaction exists. These are minor gaps given the narrow scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues