Skip to main content
Glama
JrKrishh
by JrKrishh

Related Servers

Alternatives to sove-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude Code a curated atlas of your codebase, fusing LSP-grade structure with architectural intent from ADRs, git history, and test associations for single-call context bundles.
      30 npm
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that indexes local code repositories, extracting symbols and call graphs to give Claude precise, structural answers with real file paths and line numbers. Runs entirely locally with no network requests, for privacy-focused code understanding.
      290 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides dynamic codebase context to Claude Code through tools like hybrid search, recent changes, and symbol definitions, enhancing AI-assisted coding with local RAG.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that lets a Claude chat explore your local repository and answer questions about it, returning synthesized answers with file:line references.
      3
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude Desktop complete intelligence about any public GitHub repository. Research libraries, compare packages, audit dependencies, and explore codebases through natural conversation.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that analyzes codebases to provide dependency graphs, impact analysis, and file insights across 15+ programming languages, enabling AI assistants to understand project structure and navigate code efficiently.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct analysis aspect, but analyze_repository overlaps by summarizing entry points, cycles, and complexity, which are also covered by the specialized tools. The descriptions clarify that the summary is high-level, while the other tools provide deeper dives.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools use verb_noun naming (analyze_repository, find_entry_points, find_circular_dependencies), but most_complex_files is an adjective phrase, breaking the pattern. All names use snake_case, maintaining readability despite the inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a code analysis server, falling within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool serves a distinct purpose in architectural analysis, and the count feels neither thin nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the key aspects of codebase analysis: overall summary, entry points, circular dependencies, and complexity. Minor gaps exist (e.g., dependency depth, module coupling), but the core workflows for architectural understanding are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues