Search GenLayer Docs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the agent knows this is a safe, read-only operation. The description adds no further behavioral context (e.g., query syntax, result ordering, or limitations). It does not contradict annotations, so a score of 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose. While it could benefit from additional context, such as mentioning that results are snippets or ordered by relevance, it remains concise without wasting words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple search tool, the description is adequate but not comprehensive. It does not describe the return format (e.g., section titles, snippets, links) or behavior for empty results. Given the lack of an output schema, the description should ideally provide such details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, meaning both parameters (query and limit) have descriptions in the schema. The description's phrase 'return the most relevant sections' adds minimal additional meaning. With high schema coverage, baseline is 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action ('Search'), resource ('GenLayer documentation bundle'), and outcome ('return the most relevant sections'). It effectively distinguishes itself from sibling tools like genlayer_read_doc or genlayer_get_doc_by_slug, which are for retrieving specific docs rather than searching.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For instance, it does not explain when to search instead of reading a specific doc or listing sections. The agent must infer usage from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.