Skip to main content
Glama
JoshTrebilco

Faber MCP Server

by JoshTrebilco
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Faber MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Kaipa MCP Server

      HaManhTuan
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Laravel API integration with Cursor, providing tools for routes, models, Artisan commands, configuration, and Redis cache management through Docker.
      -

    • Deployment.io MCP Server

      deployment-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables managing and deploying apps to your cloud directly from Cursor through natural language, including environment management, job monitoring, and approval workflows.
      1
      MIT

    • Ploi MCP Server

      sudanese
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Integrates Ploi.io API functionality into AI assistants for managing servers, sites, and databases through natural language. It enables features like one-command deployments, project linking, server log retrieval, and database backup management.
      46
      12 npm
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific resources and actions, such as faber_create_database for database creation, faber_deploy for deployments, and faber_set_env_var for environment variable management. There is no overlap or ambiguity between tools, making it easy for an agent to select the correct one based on the task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with the prefix 'faber_' and snake_case throughout, such as faber_list_apps, faber_create_domain, and faber_get_env. This predictable naming scheme enhances readability and usability for agents.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 17 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for the comprehensive scope of managing a Faber server, covering app deployment, domain setup, database management, and server operations. It is well-scoped with each tool serving a distinct function, though it borders on being heavy.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete CRUD and lifecycle coverage for the Faber server domain, including creation (e.g., faber_create_stack), listing (e.g., faber_list_apps), updates (e.g., faber_set_env_var), and deletion implicitly through operations like rollback. There are no obvious gaps, and agents can handle full workflows from setup to maintenance.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources