Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Bevel MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to read and write Hevy workouts, routines, exercise templates, and folders, and to generate training-period summaries, exercise progression, and workout details with dry-run previews for writes.
      22
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides local, read-only MCP access to Google Health API v4, enabling users to query recorded workouts, heart-rate samples, and related health data through natural language in an MCP client.
      3
      55 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude to query Fitbit and Pixel Watch health data — sleep, steps, heart rate, HRV, workouts, weight and nutrition — through the Google Health API, with built-in OAuth 2.0 sign-in and multi-user access so it can be hosted remotely and reached from web, desktop and mobile.
      26
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to read account status, plans, and recent workouts, search official exercise names, and, when writes are enabled, apply confirmed preview-first plan changes and historical workout logs.
      22
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients like Codex and Claude Code to securely read and manage a personal Cronometer account, including food logs, nutrient summaries with missing-data awareness, food search, biometrics, and export analysis.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables conversational logging and retrieval of workouts, sets, weigh-ins, meals, goals, plans, and progress photos through MCP-capable AI clients, with authenticated per-user storage and export/query capabilities.
      ISC

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource+action (goals, journal factors, food logs, routines, workout history), and descriptions draw the key boundaries explicitly (e.g. get_workout_data = routines/exercises vs get_workout_history = completed workouts). Minor residual ambiguity: routine reads live inside bevel_get_workout_data while routine writes use bevel_save_routine/bevel_delete_routine, so an agent looking for 'get_routine' has to infer the mapping, and set vs clear journal boolean could be confused at a glance.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all 17 tools follow a consistent bevel_verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_, set_, clear_, delete_, create_, save_, search_, log_, update_). The only deviation is bevel_auth_status, a noun phrase without a verb, which breaks the pattern slightly but remains clear.

    Tool Count4/5

    17 tools is on the high side but justified: the surface spans four distinct sub-domains (nutrition, workouts, journal, macro goals) plus auth. Each tool maps to a real operation rather than being redundant, though the nutrition set (5 tools) plus routine/journal writes pushes it toward the upper bound.

    Completeness3/5

    Food logs have full CRUD, and goals/journal booleans have read+write coverage, but there are notable gaps: workout history is read-only with no way to log a completed workout or cardio, routines can be created/replaced/deleted but not read via a dedicated tool, and custom journal types are read-only with raw schemas. Supersets and custom-journal-type creation are explicitly unsupported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues