Skip to main content
Glama
JosephDoUrden

nextjs-seo-audit-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to nextjs-seo-audit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to run SEO and AI-search readiness audits (llms.txt, crawler access, sitemaps, structured data, redirects, indexability, and more), look up startup revenue listings and leaderboards, and check a domain's SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MX records with concrete fixes. Runs locally over stdio with no account or API key, and frames all third-party responses as untrusted data.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to crawl and audit websites for SEO issues, returning structured JSON reports with errors, warnings, and key statistics.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to audit a site's technical SEO and AI-search readiness — including localhost dev servers — and retrieve rule explanations, fix templates, and generated llms.txt files so the assistant can edit the repo to resolve what it finds.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables a coding agent to audit any public page the way search engines and AI crawlers see it, including per-crawler robots.txt rules, CDN/firewall blocks, and no-JavaScript content. It returns a prioritized fix pack showing where each fix belongs in the codebase plus a command to verify it, so the agent can apply the changes, flag human-only settings, and re-run the audit to confirm.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform comprehensive SEO audits on web pages, including meta tags, headings, links, images, performance, and more, via a CLI or MCP server.
      18
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    audit_site is clearly the execution tool, while explain_finding and list_checks are read-only reference tools. Those two overlap slightly because both describe issue codes, but the distinction between one-code lookup and full module catalog is clear from the descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: explain_finding, list_checks, audit_site. There is no mixing of casing or verb style.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is compact but well-scoped for an SEO audit server: one performs the audit, one lists supported checks, and one explains findings. Each tool has a distinct role and none feels redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow of discovering checks, running an audit, and interpreting issue codes is covered, including diff support via previous. Minor gaps exist around batch auditing, configuration, or separate robots/sitemap inspection, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues