Skip to main content
Glama
JonnyWaffles

va-lis-mcp

by JonnyWaffles

Related Servers

Alternatives to va-lis-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying legislative data from the LegiScan API, including bills and votes, via natural language through an MCP gateway.
      52 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes a Congress.gov-style legislative GraphQL API to MCP clients, enabling querying bills, actions, committee activities, and cosponsors via natural language.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying U.S. legislative data from Congress.gov API using MCP resources for direct lookups and tools for searching and retrieving related data.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search New Zealand legislation, browse point-in-time versions of Acts, Bills, and secondary legislation, and read the text of sections or schedules via the official legislation.govt.nz developer API.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Remote MCP server for nonpartisan U.S. Congress data: plain-language bill decodes (bilingual EN/ES), representative lookup by ZIP with district-office phones, and what's-moving urgency ranking. Read-only, keyless.
      5
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables access to U.S. congressional data including bills, laws, members, committees, votes, nominations, CRS reports, and the Congressional Record through MCP, with stdio and Streamable HTTP support.
      168 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources (bills, members, committees, meetings, calendars), but get_bill_votes and get_roll_call both cover votes, and get_bill_patrons vs get_bill's patrons field overlap. Descriptions are detailed enough to disambiguate, though the vote-related pair could still cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: get_* for single resources, list_* for collections, check_api_key as the lone exception but still a clear verb_noun. No mixed conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count4/5

    22 tools is on the higher end but justified by the breadth of legislative data (bills, members, committees, meetings, calendars, votes). Each tool covers a distinct data need; the count feels slightly heavy but not bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the legislative domain thoroughly: sessions, bills with text/summaries/history/patrons/votes, members with their bills/votes/committees, committees with rosters/meetings/dockets, floor calendars, and API key validation. No obvious dead ends; the descriptions even document workarounds for LIS API limitations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues