va-lis-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to va-lis-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying legislative data from the LegiScan API, including bills and votes, via natural language through an MCP gateway.52 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceExposes a Congress.gov-style legislative GraphQL API to MCP clients, enabling querying bills, actions, committee activities, and cosponsors via natural language.7-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying U.S. legislative data from Congress.gov API using MCP resources for direct lookups and tools for searching and retrieving related data.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to search New Zealand legislation, browse point-in-time versions of Acts, Bills, and secondary legislation, and read the text of sections or schedules via the official legislation.govt.nz developer API.81MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceRemote MCP server for nonpartisan U.S. Congress data: plain-language bill decodes (bilingual EN/ES), representative lookup by ZIP with district-office phones, and what's-moving urgency ranking. Read-only, keyless.51AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables access to U.S. congressional data including bills, laws, members, committees, votes, nominations, CRS reports, and the Congressional Record through MCP, with stdio and Streamable HTTP support.168 npm1Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Most tools target distinct resources (bills, members, committees, meetings, calendars), but get_bill_votes and get_roll_call both cover votes, and get_bill_patrons vs get_bill's patrons field overlap. Descriptions are detailed enough to disambiguate, though the vote-related pair could still cause misselection.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: get_* for single resources, list_* for collections, check_api_key as the lone exception but still a clear verb_noun. No mixed conventions or vague verbs.
22 tools is on the higher end but justified by the breadth of legislative data (bills, members, committees, meetings, calendars, votes). Each tool covers a distinct data need; the count feels slightly heavy but not bloated.
The surface covers the legislative domain thoroughly: sessions, bills with text/summaries/history/patrons/votes, members with their bills/votes/committees, committees with rosters/meetings/dockets, floor calendars, and API key validation. No obvious dead ends; the descriptions even document workarounds for LIS API limitations.