Skip to main content
Glama

Reminders Delete Reminder

reminders_delete_reminder
Destructive

Delete a specific reminder from Apple Reminders using its unique ID when a task is no longer needed.

Instructions

Delegated Apple domain tool 'reminders_delete_reminder' exposed through Apple-Tools-MCP.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
reminder_idYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observedv1.0.4

TDQS

D1.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=false, but the description adds no behavioral context about deletion irreversibility, permission requirements, or side effects. It neither contradicts nor enriches the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, but the single sentence is largely boilerplate about being 'delegated' and 'exposed through Apple-Tools-MCP.' It does not earn its place by conveying useful operational information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive single-parameter tool, the description lacks any context about deletion behavior, expected input provenance, or distinction from completion/update operations. It is minimally sufficient only because the name and schema happen to make the core intent obvious.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning to the sole required reminder_id parameter. The agent is left with only the bare schema field name and type, with no explanation of where the ID comes from or what it identifies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only restates the tool name ('Delegated Apple domain tool 'reminders_delete_reminder'...') and does not independently state that it deletes a reminder. It provides no verb-resource explanation beyond what the name/title already conveys.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given for when to call this tool or when to prefer alternatives such as reminders_complete_reminder, reminders_update_reminder, or reminders_delete_list. The description does not support selecting it over siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/JonathanRReed/Apple-MCPs'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server