plane-local-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to plane-local-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceUnofficial MCP server for self-hosted Plane Community Edition, enabling project management tasks like managing work items, cycles, modules, and initiatives via natural language.1002MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLocal MCP server for a self-hosted Plane instance that exposes tickets, cycles, modules, labels, and states as MCP tools with both read and mutation capabilities.7 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the Plane project management API, enabling issue retrieval, listing, commenting, state changes, and creation.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to fully manage a Plane workspace, including projects, work items, states, labels, cycles, modules, comments, and members.38MIT

Plane MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI interfaces to seamlessly interact with Plane's project management system, allowing management of projects, issues, states, and other work items through a standardized API.46121 npm325MIT- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables LLMs to interact with Plane.so, allowing them to manage projects and issues through Plane's API. Using this server, LLMs like Claude can directly interact with your project management workflows while maintaining user control and security.764 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action, but the pair retrieve_issue and get_issue_by_identifier both retrieve a single issue, differing only by lookup key. This minor overlap is clarified by descriptions, so most tools are unambiguous.
Names follow a verb_noun pattern with snake_case throughout, but verbs are inconsistent (list, get, retrieve, update, add, remove). This is readable but not as uniform as using the same verb for the same operation.
With 14 tools, the server covers issues, cycles, states, labels, modules, and projects without feeling bloated. This is well-scoped for a project management integration.
The surface has strong read and update coverage for issues and cycles, but notably lacks a create_issue tool or any deletion capability. Agents cannot create new issues, so the lifecycle is incomplete.