Skip to main content
Glama
JonasSousaAP

MCP Advbox Server

by JonasSousaAP

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Advbox Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to Brazilian judicial data from DataJud CNJ and 91 courts, enabling process consultation, monitoring, and deadline calculation under the Civil Procedure Code.
      9
      102
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to Brazilian judicial data via DataJud CNJ, LexML, and local corpus, enabling process consultation, legal research, and document generation with Visual Law.
      26
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Conta Azul Financial APIs to manage accounts, balances, and transactions through natural language. It features specialized tools for tracking cash flow, processing payables and receivables, and generating comprehensive financial reports.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the Argentine judiciary system (SAC - Justicia Cordoba) via Claude Desktop, supporting case searches, notifications, and procedural deadlines.
      12
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct by resource and action (e.g., list_customers vs get_customer vs create_customer). The only minor overlap is between get_lawsuit_history and get_lawsuit_movements, but descriptions clarify their different scopes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent advbox_verb_noun pattern, using standard verbs like list, get, create, and update. There are no mixed naming conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count4/5

    17 tools is slightly heavy for a typical server, but it covers multiple entities (customers, lawsuits, tasks, transactions, settings) in a coherent way. Each tool has a clear role, and the count is justified by the broad domain.

    Completeness3/5

    Core workflows are covered (create/get/list lawsuits, customers, tasks), but there are gaps: no update or delete for customers and tasks, no transaction detail, and no create/delete for tasks. These omissions could require workarounds but do not break primary use cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues