Skip to main content
Glama
JonasBaath

MCP Refchecker

by JonasBaath
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Refchecker

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • CiteGuard

      xiaweiyi713
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that verifies the existence, metadata accuracy, and claim support of academic citations by querying sources like OpenAlex, Crossref, and arXiv, enabling AI agents to fact-check references.
      7
      34 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    • papers-mcp

      surendranb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for scientific grounding: search and discover open-access research papers across arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar, and retrieve references/citations from paywalled journals via public DOI/abstract metadata.
      3
      225 PyPI
      5
      MIT

    • Scholar MCP Server

      mlintangmz2765
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Unified MCP server for scientific literature search and extraction, integrating databases like Scopus, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, and Unpaywall to enable AI agents to discover papers, track citations, and analyze content.
      27
      MIT

    • scholar-toolkit-mcp

      czwziy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Comprehensive MCP server for academic research workflows, enabling paper searching across multiple sources, manuscript processing with citation placeholders, search caching, and citation export.
      11
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no ambiguity between tools. The single tool has a clear, singular purpose.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    With only one tool, consistency with other tools is not applicable. The name itself (verify_citation) follows a reasonable verb_noun pattern, but no pattern across tools can be evaluated.

    Tool Count2/5

    The server provides only one tool for the domain of citation verification. While verifying a citation is a focused task, real-world usage often requires additional operations like batch verification, retrieving paper details, or checking multiple citations at once, making the single tool feel too limited.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool covers a single operation (verifying a citation) but lacks other related operations such as searching for papers, listing citations for a paper, or bulk verification. For a comprehensive citation checking service, the coverage is incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources