Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Web Bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that wraps agent-browser to let LLMs control a real browser, providing tools for navigation, interaction, reading page content, accessibility snapshots, screenshots, and session management.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Agent-native browser control MCP server that enables AI agents to browse and interact with web pages via accessibility tree snapshots and ref ID-based commands.
      15
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A zero-dependency MCP server that drives a real Chrome browser through a companion extension, enabling AI agents to automate real user sessions with trusted input events, compact accessibility-tree snapshots, and 14 tools for navigation, interaction, scripting, and inspection.
      246 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI clients a Steel-managed Chromium browser to read pages that block plain fetch, take screenshots, and interact with sites via clicking, typing, and form filling, with explicit browser sessions and access to the accessibility tree or markdown.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local browser MCP server that lets AI assistants control a real desktop browser via tools like navigate, snapshot, and search_web.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose, but web_status and web_tab_list both report tab information, creating potential confusion. All other tools are clearly separated by their actions (navigation, input, inspection, tab management).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use the consistent 'web_' prefix with snake_case, and action-oriented names like web_open, web_click, and web_tab_new. The tab management group follows a clear 'tab'_verb pattern, making the naming highly predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 22 tools, the set is slightly above the ideal range, but the breadth of browser automation justifies it: navigation, interaction, inspection, tab management, and session control each have dedicated tools. The count is borderline heavy but not bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the full browser automation lifecycle: navigation, page interaction, content extraction, tab management, waiting, and shutdown. Missing niche features like file upload or frame switching can be handled via web_evaluate, so there are no critical gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues