mcp-server-filemaker
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-server-filemaker
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for FileMaker Server OData 4.01 API integration, enabling AI assistants to discover databases, perform CRUD operations, and manage connections.18 npm13MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects Claude to FileMaker databases via the Data API, enabling natural language queries, record management, layout exploration, and script execution.11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Odoo ERP systems, allowing natural language access to business data, CRUD operations, and instance management without requiring Odoo module installation.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Creatio CRM that enables AI assistants to read, create, update, delete records, execute business processes, and manage settings via OData and REST APIs.1812 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Odoo ERP, allowing natural language queries, record creation, updates, and deletions.LGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central that enables AI assistants to query and manage Business Central data via full CRUD operations.628 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: CRUD, metadata, query, testing, scripting, schema, batch. Overlaps are intentional (e.g., create_record vs create_test_record). No ambiguity between tools.
All tools follow a consistent 'fm_verb_noun' pattern. Verbs are clear and standardized (create, get, update, delete, assert, run, set, add, cleanup, introspect). Minor deviations like 'batch' are still effective.
19 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but each tool addresses a specific aspect of FileMaker interaction (CRUD, schema, testing, scripting, metadata). The count feels earned and not excessive.
Core operations are well-covered: CRUD, query, metadata, scripting, testing. Minor gaps include lack of schema modification beyond adding fields (e.g., no delete table/field) and no tool for file uploads, but these are non-essential.