Skip to main content
Glama

list_organizations

Read-only

List all organizations (companies) in a Huly workspace to map accounts, contacts, and company records before linking issues or projects.

Instructions

List all organizations (companies) in the workspace

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_organizations"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
workspaceNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv3.5.1

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The readOnlyHint annotation already establishes this is a safe read, so the description only needs to add scope context, which it does by saying results are limited to the workspace. It does not disclose pagination behavior, result ordering, or whether archived/inactive organizations are included.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short sentence, front-loaded with the verb and resource, with zero filler. Nothing could be removed without losing information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only list tool with an annotation covering safety and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It leaves open pagination, default-workspace behavior, and the shape of returned records, which matter for a list endpoint.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for the single `workspace` parameter, so the description should compensate. It only implies workspace scoping and never explains whether the parameter is optional, what happens when it is omitted, or what identifier format it expects.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("List all organizations") and disambiguates the term with a synonym ("companies"). The resource name itself separates it from the sibling list_* tools, though it does nothing explicit to position itself among them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, no exclusions, and no mention of alternatives. The only usage signal is the word "all," which implies an unfiltered enumeration, but that is inferred rather than stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools