Skip to main content
Glama
Jmfrodero

MCP DevOps Kit

by Jmfrodero
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP DevOps Kit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • AMEVA MCP Toolkit

      uno-km
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server integrating developer tools including Git control, document conversion, remote SSH execution, database operations, and utilities for automation and development productivity.
      1
      -

    • GitHub Integrated MCP Server

      wj-yuta-imai
      -
      license
      C
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server with GitHub API integration that enables interaction with repositories, issues, pull requests, and file management through a standardized interface.
      1
      -

    • Gooseworks MCP

      EduardKuun
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes GitHub tools for repository management, code search, issue creation, and pull request operations.
      MIT

    • GitHub MCP Server

      renantrendt
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to perform GitHub operations including repository management, file operations, issue tracking, and pull request creation.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clear and distinct operation: Docker tools cover logs, listing, and stats; filesystem tools cover listing, reading, and stats; GitHub tools cover issue creation, repo info, and repo listing. No overlap across categories.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent domain_verb_noun pattern (e.g., docker_logs, fs_ls, github_create_issue), making it easy to infer action and scope from the name.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools across three well-defined domains, the count is within the optimal range (3–15). Each tool serves a distinct purpose without redundancy.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set covers only monitoring and basic read operations for Docker and filesystem, and minimal GitHub actions. Missing fundamental operations like container management, file writes, GitHub issues listing/updating, and PR handling. This is a significant gap for a 'DevOps Kit'.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources