mcp-astgl-knowledge
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-astgl-knowledge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that grounds AI answers in a local, maintained knowledge base and optionally fills gaps from the web, fully local with SQLite.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for a content-first knowledge base, enabling AI agents to search (full-text, semantic, hybrid) and retrieve Markdown documents, list content, and find related docs.9 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for querying a personal knowledge base using semantic RAG, powered by DeepSeek and local embeddings from Ollama.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for a self-hosted RAG system that enables AI tools to search and retrieve grounded answers from locally ingested documents via MCP tools, with local embeddings and no API key required.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceLocal-first RAG indexing and semantic search MCP server. Enables document retrieval and context-aware queries using local embedding models.36 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that provides semantic memory with search, related-content traversal, and write-back capabilities, all powered by local embeddings of your notes, documents, and chat histories.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_answer retrieves direct answers to specific questions, list_topics enumerates all available topics, and search_articles performs keyword-based searches. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection unambiguous for an agent.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_answer, list_topics, search_articles) with clear, descriptive verbs. The naming is uniform and predictable across the entire set.
Three tools is reasonable for a knowledge base server, covering core operations like querying, listing, and searching. It might feel slightly thin if advanced filtering or topic management were expected, but it's well-scoped for basic access.
The tools provide good coverage for accessing a knowledge base: retrieving answers, listing content, and searching. A minor gap is the lack of tools for updating or managing the knowledge base, but this is acceptable if the server is read-only.