openmemkit
Related Servers
Alternatives to openmemkit
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to capture, structure, remember, and retrieve source-backed memory as local Markdown files, with reviewable writes and no cloud dependency.179MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA local-first shared memory layer for MCP-aware agents like Claude, Codex, and Hermes, enabling persistent memory across chats and clients via Markdown files and SQLite FTS.62MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides AI agents with persistent, long-term memory via OKF-formatted markdown and SQLite indexing, enabling stateful storage, retrieval, and search across sessions.6212MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides persistent long-term memory for AI assistants with tag-based retrieval, wiki-style linking, and source references, storing memories as markdown files with SQLite index.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables personal AI agents to store and recall durable, private, human-readable relationship memory about people in a user's life, using Markdown as canonical storage with disposable SQLite and vector indexes for fast retrieval.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides a hybrid memory architecture with a thin SQLite index and Markdown cold storage, enabling AI agents to write, query, link, and rebuild long-term memories via MCP tools, model-agnostic and zero third-party dependencies.74MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
memory_domains, memory_list, and memory_stats all return overlapping inventory/index information, which could cause misselection. memory_update and memory_write also both suggest writing, though they target different backends; the descriptions help, but boundaries are not always obvious.
All tools share the memory_ prefix and most follow a verb-oriented pattern like search, get, list, update, delete, write, and flush. A few noun-style names such as domains, stats, and history deviate slightly, but the overall convention remains predictable.
11 tools is well within the ideal range for a memory-management server. Each major operation—bootstrap, read, search, list, stats, update, delete, history, write, and flush—has a dedicated tool without excessive fragmentation.
The set covers session bootstrap, reading/searching, metadata inspection, update/delete, audit history, and the write_log flush pipeline. Minor gaps exist: delete is described as recoverable but no restore tool is exposed, and there is no direct create-file operation apart from the write_log/flush path.