skills_get_options

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Lists all four return components (config_schema, variants, dependencies, limitations) and implies read-only operation ('load'), but does not explicitly state it has no side effects. With no annotations, this is sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise, front-loaded with 'OPTIONAL STEP 2b', and structured with conditions and return description. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given one simple parameter and presence of an output schema, the description fully covers tool behavior, usage context, and return details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description does not elaborate on the single parameter 'skill_id', which may be unclear without context. The description fails to compensate for the lack of schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool loads config schema, variants, and constraints for a skill. It is well-differentiated from siblings like skills_get_body by being optional and for customization.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly specifies the two conditions for calling (user customization or skills_get_body instructions mention configurable options) and advises against default use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.