F
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceA minimal MCP server that exposes a focused set of GitHub PR review tools to AI agents, enabling PR listing, detail retrieval, comment viewing, and thread management.
5
-
gh-review-queue-mcp
by JigeeshaJain
Related Servers
Alternatives to gh-review-queue-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with GitHub pull requests and issues via natural language. Provides tools to list PRs, inspect diffs, check CI status, and post review comments with write-safety guards.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server for triaging and reviewing GitHub pull requests via the GitHub REST API, providing typed tools to list, inspect, comment, add labels, and submit reviews.82 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server exposing AI-powered GitHub PR review as tools.5-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with GitHub Pull Requests, enabling listing, viewing, commenting, reviewing, and merging PRs.648 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides operational tooling over the GitHub API — issue triage, PR review monitoring, repo health audits, and team access reviews.111MIT
TDQS
A4.4/5.0
Scored across 1 tool
Disambiguation5/5
The set contains only one tool, so there is no possibility of overlap or selecting the wrong tool. Its purpose is clearly and specifically described.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool name follows the conventional verb_noun pattern with a clear action and resource. There are no other tool names to create inconsistency.
Tool Count4/5
One tool is small, but the server is narrow by design: it exists specifically to fetch a GitHub review queue. The tool is substantial rather than trivial, so the count is slightly lean but still appropriate for the server's scope.
Completeness5/5
The tool covers the full review queue surface described: own PRs, requested changes, direct review requests, and team review requests, along with ranking reasons and match counts. There are no obvious read-model gaps within this narrow domain.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues