Submit confirmed prepared order

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already flag destructive and open-world hints, and the description adds valuable behavioral context: the requirement for explicit user confirmation, single-use token, and 60-second expiration. This goes beyond the structured annotations and clarifies the action's safety-critical nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the primary action, and every sentence adds essential information. No superfluous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has only two parameters, an output schema is absent, and annotations cover safety, the description is sufficiently complete. It covers the critical preconditions and side-effect nature, though it does not describe return values or error behavior, which is acceptable for this low-complexity action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to explain basic parameter semantics. It does reinforce the binding between the token and the exact preview, which aligns with the schema but adds no new meaning beyond it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Places') and resource ('previously prepared order'), clearly distinguishing this submit action from the sibling prepare/get tools. It precisely identifies what the tool accomplishes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives an explicit precondition: call only after explicit user confirmation of the exact preview in the conversation. It also notes the token's single-use nature and 60-second expiry, which imply when not to call. It does not name alternatives, but no direct alternative submit tool exists among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.