generate_report
Create an execution summary with metrics and optionally add screenshots, console logs, and network data.
Instructions
Create execution summary with metrics
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Create an execution summary with metrics and optionally add screenshots, console logs, and network data.
Create execution summary with metrics
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description should disclose behavior. It only says 'create summary' but does not explain side effects, output format, or whether it modifies state. Missing crucial information for a generation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no waste, but it is too brief. Could benefit from a second sentence describing output or parameters.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, so description should hint at return value. It does not. With 3 parameters and no parameter descriptions, the tool is underspecified for correct invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 3 boolean parameters with defaults, but no descriptions in schema. Description does not mention parameters at all. Agent cannot learn what includeScreenshot, includeConsole, includeNetwork control from description alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states 'Create execution summary with metrics,' which is a clear verb+resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like check_console and take_screenshot by implying aggregation, but does not explicitly differentiate.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use or not use this tool vs alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites or context. Implied usage is after execution, but no explicit criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Jenish3601/SmartBrowserMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server