Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Firefox MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control the user's installed Firefox with real logins, saved passwords, bookmarks, and extensions while offering all Playwright MCP tools and options. It runs on a copied profile so the daily browser remains untouched and supports multiple profiles or accounts.
      25
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for generic browser automation using Playwright. Enables MCP clients to navigate pages, inspect elements, execute JavaScript, capture screenshots, and monitor console logs and network traffic via a headless Chromium instance.
      7
      5 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Firefox you actually use: an add-on plus a small native helper, so an agent gets your real profile, tabs and logged-in sessions instead of a blank headless browser. 45 tools for tabs, accessibility snapshots with refs, clicking, typing, screenshots, bookmarks, history and downloads.
      2
      Mozilla Public 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes Firefox browser automation capabilities through the Model Context Protocol, enabling AI assistants to control web browsers for navigation, interaction, and data collection tasks.
      4
      BSD 3-Clause
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive browser automation MCP server using Playwright, offering 50+ tools for page control, element interaction, content extraction, and more across multiple browser engines.
      10 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate a privacy-focused Firefox-based browser through MCP, with session and profile management, navigation, interaction, extraction, screenshots, JavaScript execution, tabs, downloads, and permission/URL validation.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but some overlap exists between click, send_key, and type_text for user input actions, and between get_page_content and get_page_text for content extraction. The descriptions help clarify differences, but an agent might occasionally misselect between these similar tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structures throughout, such as navigate, get_current_url, and create_tab. There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the set predictable and easy to parse.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 29 tools, the count feels heavy for a browser automation server, bordering on excessive. While the tools cover many aspects, some could potentially be consolidated or omitted without losing functionality, making the set slightly overwhelming for its scope.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for browser automation and debugging, including navigation, tab management, content extraction, user interactions, monitoring, and debugging features. There are no obvious gaps; agents can perform full workflows from launching the browser to analyzing performance and errors.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues