crapkit
crapkit's MCP server exposes twelve read-only tools for inspecting a scored repo's CRAP scores, complexity debt, ranked worklist, run/ratchet history, and gate verdicts — it runs no tests and takes no claims.
get_next_item — the next function to fix as a work packet (worst by crap), with
topfor N packets,scope/excludefilters, plusempty/reasonsas the stop condition.list_worklist — the whole risk ranking (ccn × recency-weighted churn), active and dormant rows, capped by
top.get_function_brief — start-editing packet for one function: source, params, scored row, uncovered lines, twins, coupling, gate rule, and the refresh/test/gate/verify commands.
get_function_history — one function's ccn/cov/crap/flag across runs, plus optional
git log -Lcommits and covering tests.list_runs — every run in the store, which commit it measured, and which one is today's trusted baseline.
get_trend — per-run totals and grades per scope, for the repo's debt trajectory.
check_gate —
rescore --gateverdict for an edited file: changed functions over ceiling, unread files, fresh-vs-stale coverage caveat.get_ratchet_report — ratchet burn-down: open marks with ages, repayments in 30/90 days, policy violations, uncommitted marks.
list_coupled_files — file pairs that keep landing in the same commits, with support and confidence.
list_duplicate_functions — near-duplicate function pairs by line-shingle containment.
check_config — doctor-style health check: typo keys, empty scopes, lane artifacts, runners, store, versions, resources.
list_claims — open queue claims held by other sessions.
All tools are read-only and repo-scoped (
repomay be any directory under the checkout); oversized answers are truncated with atruncated.fullCLI command to print the whole result.
Analyzes Git-tracked repositories, using git history to rank functions by churn and change coupling, and providing a commit gate that blocks changes that add complexity debt.
crapkit

crapkit scores every function in your repo on complexity times uncovered risk, ranks the worst ones by how often the file changes, and blocks commits that add more. It reads Python, TypeScript, TSX, JavaScript, Swift, Go, Rust, shell, PowerShell, C and C++, Objective-C, Vue, Java and Zig through lizard, and joins per-function branch coverage from the istanbul or coverage.py artifact your own test command already writes. JSON commands use sorted keys and a versioned schema for scripts, coding agents and the optional MCP server.
CRAP = ccn^2 * (1 - cov)^3 + ccnThe name is not ours: C.R.A.P. (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) was coined for crap4j by Alberto Savoia and Bob Evans in 2007.
ccn is the smaller of standard and modified cyclomatic complexity, both read off one
lizard pass. cov is branch coverage inside the function's span; with no branches it
falls back to statement coverage, and with no statements to invoked-or-not, so a
half-executed straight-line function never reads as fully covered.
Above the ceiling, coverage cannot save you. Decompose. At the default ceiling of 6, a function at ccn 7 with 100% coverage still scores 7 and still fails the gate. The only move that clears it is splitting the function.
Why 6 and not 30. crap4j's conventional threshold of 30 is a CRAP score: it lets an
untested ccn 5 through (25 + 5 = 30) and a fully covered ccn 30 too. crapkit's default
is a complexity ceiling, because coverage can at best collapse CRAP to ccn, and a
function you cannot cover past ccn 6 is one you decompose. Set target = 30 in
crapkit.toml if you want the crap4j number. A repo with existing debt does not need to:
ratchet seed marks today's over-ceiling functions at today's score, the gate then judges
only the functions a change touches, and marks may only fall, so adoption never starts with
a wall of red. Next to crap4py, radon, xenon, wily and SonarQube:
docs/comparison.md.
crapkit scores git-tracked files only. Source you have not git added is invisible to
it; init and verify name the first three such files they find.
Start with | When |
You want the first score in an existing Git repository. | |
Python or TypeScript quickstart | You want a worked example from setup through a passing verify. |
You need to choose scopes, wire tests or introduce a ratchet to existing debt. | |
You already have saved runs, ratchet marks or an installed plugin. | |
You are scripting commands or connecting a coding agent. |
The 60-second start
pip install crapkit
cd your-repo
crapkit init # write crapkit.toml and ignore measurement output
crapkit doctor # check scopes, test commands and coverage dependencies
crapkit coverage # runs the lane, joins coverage, stores a scored run
crapkit worklist # the ranked risk map
crapkit ratchet seed
git add crapkit.toml crapkit-ratchet.tsv .gitignore
git commit -m "adopt crapkit"
crapkit verify # the first passing verdictNot a Python repo? uvx crapkit init runs the same commands and adds nothing to your
manifest: see A repo that is not Python. A Python repo
skips uvx and installs crapkit as above, or with uv tool install or pipx install; that
section says why. pip stops with externally-managed-environment? See
When pip refuses.
coverage measures a commit, so a fresh git init repo needs its first commit before
it. Until then it exits 4 and says so:
$ crapkit coverage
crapkit: the git repository at /repo has no commit yet: crapkit measures a commit, so make the first one (git add, then git commit) and run it againinit detects pytest, Vitest and Jest from the repository's own files. Review the
generated config before running its commands. When detection leaves a commented
lane, fill it in using the lane recipes.
Commit the adoption files, then run crapkit verify to establish a passing verdict.
Install the commit gate when the config and ratchet are ready.
Each step prints the next one: init names coverage, coverage names worklist,
worklist names ratchet seed, and ratchet seed names the commit and verify.
coverage scores, worklist ranks:
$ crapkit coverage
run 1 @ fae4db93108: 2 functions scored: 2 measured, 1 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 41.0, grade F
-> next: crapkit worklist
$ crapkit worklist
worklist @ fae4db93108 (run 1, floor ccn>=5, churn 12mo) - 1 of 1 active (worklist_top 50), 0 dormant
risk 14.0 ccn 14 crap 38.5 cov 50% 1c/1a calc/grade.py:7 classify( score , attempts , late , bonus )
no crapkit-ratchet.tsv yet: seed marks each function over its ceiling at today's score, and from then on a mark may only fall
-> next: crapkit ratchet seedrisk 14.0 is ccn times a churn weight of one: a one-commit repo has no spread of commits
to weight, so each commit counts once and the ranking is complexity order until the
history grows (Risk). crap 38.5 and cov 50% are the
score and the coverage behind it.
ratchet seed signs today's debt at today's score. From then on marks only ever fall, so
the repo can get better and never worse while you burn it down.
One thing stops most first runs: the coverage plugin. init writes a lane that shells
out to your own test runner, and the runner needs its coverage package installed:
pytest-cov for pytest, @vitest/coverage-v8 (pinned to your vitest major) for vitest.
Without it the lane produces no artifact and coverage exits 5 quoting the runner's own
error. A pytest lane also needs coverage.py 7.13.1 or newer, which writes the function
start lines crapkit reads; an older one fails the lane at exit 5. For pytest, init probes the python its lane will run and prints the install
command when pytest_cov is missing; pip install "crapkit[py]" pulls the plugin
alongside crapkit when the two share a venv. On a Windows PATH holding only the py
launcher it writes py, not a python3 the lane could never run, and when cmd.exe cannot
start the interpreter at all (exit 9009, the Store alias) it names that instead of guessing
at pytest-cov. A repo that pins no lockfile and carries its own .venv gets that venv's
interpreter in the lane, when that interpreter can import pytest, rather than whichever
python the shell answers with. The two quickstarts below walk a real repo end to end.
On Windows a lane command is read by cmd.exe, the shell that will run it, not by sh. Double quotes are the portable quoting. A single-quoted value is refused at config load with exit 3, because cmd.exe would hand pytest five words and the lane would write no artifact:
# the lane in crapkit.toml
command = "python -m pytest -m 'not live and not perf' --cov=calc --cov-branch --cov-report=json:.crapkit/cov/py.json"
$ crapkit doctor
crapkit: lane 'py': positional argument 'live' narrows a full-suite coverage run; drop it, attach it to the flag it belongs to (-n8, --numprocesses=8), or set full_suite = false deliberately (cmd.exe does not treat ' as a quote: write the value in double quotes); a suite whose testpaths cannot be collected in one process needs one lane per testpath, each with full_suite = false and its own artifactWrite it -m "not live and not perf". Carets, && and | segments, redirections and
empty quoted arguments all read the way the shell reads them, so a chained lane
(cd tests && python -m pytest --cov ...) is checked one segment at a time. doctor reads
a lane the same way, and FAILs one whose runner will not start.
Related MCP server: PhpCodeArcheology
Install
pip install crapkitThat is the release on PyPI. For the unreleased tip
of main, or from a local clone (run at the clone root):
pip install git+https://github.com/JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit.git
pip install .Commits on main between two releases carry the same version string, and pip keeps an
installed crapkit whose version matches, so running the git line again after a new
commit leaves the old code in place. This line replaces it with the tip:
pip install --force-reinstall --no-deps git+https://github.com/JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit.gitpip install . in a clone rebuilds on every run and needs no flag.
When pip refuses
Debian 12, Ubuntu 23.04 and later, Homebrew and uv mark the Python they install as
theirs (PEP 668), and pip refuses to write into it with
error: externally-managed-environment:
$ pip install crapkit
error: externally-managed-environmentGive crapkit an environment of its own. Either line installs it into one and puts a
crapkit command in ~/.local/bin (%USERPROFILE%\.local\bin on Windows), the
command the agent plugins start:
pipx install crapkit
uv tool install crapkitWhen that directory is not on PATH yet, the installer says so and names the fix:
pipx ensurepath, or uv tool update-shell. Open a new shell after either. The
python on PATH does not hold this install, and the commit hook runs the
crapkit command before it tries python, so it reaches either install as printed.
A Python repo can carry crapkit in its own venv instead, beside the test dependencies its lane runs:
python3 -m venv .venv
. .venv/bin/activate
pip install "crapkit[py]"The same from cmd.exe on Windows:
python -m venv .venv
.venv\Scripts\activate
pip install "crapkit[py]"--break-system-packages makes pip write into the system Python anyway, where the next
OS package update can break crapkit or the OS's own tools. None of the routes above
needs it.
A repo that is not Python
crapkit is a command-line tool, never a dependency of the code it scores. A TypeScript,
Go or Rust repo adds nothing to its own manifest. With uv
on the machine, uvx fetches crapkit into a cache of its own and runs it:
$ uvx crapkit init
wrote crapkit.toml with 1 scope(s): src
detected 1 lane(s) from this repo's own files: js - next: run `uvx crapkit coverage`
added to .gitignore: .crapkit/
$ uvx crapkit coverage
$ uvx crapkit worklistuvx puts no crapkit on PATH, so every next step crapkit prints under uvx starts with
uvx crapkit. The lane still runs your own test runner, so Vitest or Jest and its coverage
package come from the repo's node_modules as they do today. uv tool install crapkit or
pipx install crapkit puts a crapkit command on PATH once, which is what the
commit gate and the Claude Code plugin call. The ratchet's merge driver takes
either form; the git merge driver
gives the uvx line. uv brings its own Python when the machine has none.
A Python repo installs crapkit instead: in the environment its suite runs in
(pip install "crapkit[py]"), or with uv tool install crapkit or pipx install crapkit.
uvx puts its own environment first on the PATH the lane inherits, so the lane's python
starts uv's cached interpreter, which holds neither the suite's packages nor pytest-cov.
init then says that interpreter cannot import pytest_cov, and installing pytest-cov into
uv's cache fixes nothing the suite needs.
Requires Python 3.11 or newer and Git on PATH. On an older Python pip stops with
No matching distribution found for crapkit, and uvx crapkit runs crapkit on a Python
3.11 or newer that uv finds or downloads. The CLI has one runtime dependency,
lizard>=1.24.0,<1.25; a package mirror needs both distributions. Install into the environment
you intend to use, then check crapkit --version. The pip install -e ".[dev,accuracy-push]" under
Development is a different thing: it adds the test extras, for people
changing crapkit.
pip install --user crapkit puts the crapkit command in your user scripts directory:
~/.local/bin on Linux, ~/Library/Python/3.12/bin for a python.org Python 3.12 on
macOS, %APPDATA%\Python\Python312\Scripts for Python 3.12 on Windows. When that
directory is not on PATH, pip ends its install with WARNING: The script crapkit is installed in '...' which is not on PATH. Add the directory it names to PATH and open a
new shell. Until then the shell answers crapkit with command not found (is not recognized on Windows), and the Claude Code plugin lists its server as
Failed to connect.
Python projects can install pip install "crapkit[py]" in their test environment to
include pytest-cov and subprocess-capable coverage.py. A separate tool installation
still needs the coverage plugin in the environment that runs the suite.
Analysis and scoring run locally and send no telemetry. Configured lane, mutation and alert commands run with your permissions and can contact services or change files. Review those commands before running crapkit in a repository you do not trust (SECURITY.md).
$ crapkit --version
crapkit 0.8.1python -m crapkit works identically to the console script and is what to use from a
source checkout. A next step crapkit prints names crapkit when PATH finds this
installation's console script, and otherwise the interpreter running it, spelled with
forward slashes (C:/venv/Scripts/python.exe -m crapkit coverage) so Git Bash, cmd.exe
and PowerShell all run it as printed. A segment that holds a space is quoted on its own
(C:/"Program Files"/Python312/python.exe -m crapkit coverage), so the line never opens
with a quote and runs in PowerShell too. One case loses cmd.exe: a venv's python.exe in
a spaced directory with no 8.3 short name, where you put the whole path in double quotes
by hand (docs/adr/0003).
Every subcommand accepts --repo PATH (default: the nearest crapkit.toml
at or above the current directory, so a monorepo workspace finds the root's), and with it
you never have to cd into the repo you are scoring; Subcommands shows
where the flag goes. A leading ~ in PATH is your home directory, also in cmd.exe and in
an MCP client's args, where no shell expands it.
Upgrading
Keep the CLI and plugin versions aligned, measure fresh coverage after upgrading,
and review any ratchet identity refusal before reseeding. The current reader is
analysis version 13. It reads a coverage.py function's span from the start_line
coverage.py 7.13.1 and newer write, and refuses a report without one. It scores a source
saved as UTF-16 and keys an identifier that holds one of the five bytes cp1252 leaves
undefined by its name. It moves numbers in every language but Python and some of
Python's cognitive and nesting, puts JavaScript and TypeScript coverage on the function
that owns it, and computes CRAP alike on every platform. So every marks file re-seeds once. Version 11, in 0.8.0, renamed once each Python def with a PEP 695
type parameter list and each def nested three or more deep, and listed a def whose body
sits on its colon line; crapkit ratchet prune drops the marks left under the old names.
Older JavaScript and TypeScript callback marks can require a reviewed mapping.
Follow the upgrade guide
for the upgrade line each installer takes (pip, pip --user, pipx, uv tool, uvx and a git
install), saved state, portable records and Windows launcher locks.
CHANGELOG.md says
what each release changed.
Upgrading from 0.8.0 to 0.8.1
Install coverage.py 7.13.1 or newer where each Python lane runs:
pip install -U "coverage>=7.13.1", orpip install -U "crapkit[py]"when crapkit shares the suite's venv.Upgrade crapkit in every clone, then re-seed each repo once:
crapkit coverage,crapkit ratchet prune,crapkit ratchet seed. When a failed verify pins the baseline, pass--baseline Nto prune and to seed.Commit the re-seed together with every pin that runs crapkit: the CI install pin, the Action's
uses:pin and the pre-commitrev. 0.8.1'sverifyrefuses marks stamped with analysis version 11, and 0.8.0's refuses marks stamped 13.Keep
{python}and{python:DIR}out of a committedcrapkit.tomluntil every clone runs 0.8.1: 0.8.0 hands the token to the shell as written, and the lane fails.
Until the re-seed, crapkit verify refuses the marks 0.8.0 stamped, at exit 3:
crapkit: ratchet marks were recorded under [crapkit-analysis=11 lizard=1.24.0] but this run measures [crapkit-analysis=13 lizard=1.24.0] - CRAP scores are not comparable across metric versions; run `crapkit coverage`, then `crapkit ratchet prune`, then re-baseline with `crapkit ratchet seed`The upgrade guide lists every step in order, and analysis version 13 says what moves. A metric-stamp refusal from an older upgrade is quoted under analysis version 8.
The exe lock on Windows
A running crapkit.exe mcp holds its launcher open, and each installer meets that lock
its own way. From pip 23.3 on, pip succeeds: it moves the busy crapkit.exe aside and
installs the new release, and the running server keeps serving the old code until you
restart its client. pipx does the same when it installs through pip. An older pip, such
as the 22.3.1 a Python 3.11.2 venv ships, fails with ERROR: Could not install packages due to an OSError: [WinError 5] Access is denied and puts the old release back: run
python -m pip install --upgrade pip first, or stop the server as for uv. uv tool upgrade crapkit fails with os error 32. uv tool install crapkit@latest, and pipx upgrade crapkit when pipx installs through uv, fail with Access is denied. (os error 5); after that uv tool install the crapkit command fails with ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'crapkit' until the install runs again. After any of those failures,
stop the server or its agent session, rerun the same command, then restart the client. The
Windows upgrade procedure
lists what each installer printed.
Removing crapkit
Take the commit hook and the merge driver out before the package: both call crapkit.
After pip uninstall crapkit alone, the sh hook Route 1 and Route 2 write keeps judging
every commit through uvx crapkit on a machine with uv, with whichever crapkit release uv
has cached or can download, and on a machine without uv stops every commit on
No module named crapkit, or on exec: python: not found where there is no python at
all, as on a Debian, Ubuntu or macOS that has only python3. The PowerShell hook Route 1 and the handbook write names the launcher
that pip uninstall crapkit deletes, so it stops every commit on
No such file or directory, with uv or without it.
Every merge that touches crapkit-ratchet.tsv conflicts after the driver's
crapkit: not found. The upgrade guide's
Removing crapkit
lists each piece, in a repo and on the machine.
The Claude Code plugin
claude plugin marketplace add JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit --sparse .claude-plugin plugin
claude plugin install crapkit@crapkitTwo commands, installed once per user, and every repo on the machine gets it. The plugin
ships three skills, the read-side MCP server, and one advisory PostToolUse hook that names
any function an edit pushed over its ceiling. Claude reaches two of the skills by itself,
crapkit and crapkit-recover; the third you type, as /crapkit:crapkit-onboard, because
wiring a repo up happens once and its description has no business in every turn's window.
It adds no files to your repo, and it needs the crapkit CLI on PATH.
The hook is one shell command, crapkit claude-hook --protocol 1, so it runs as written in
any Claude Code version with plugin support, and in the other agents that load Claude Code
plugins: Cursor (which imports them), GitHub Copilot CLI and VS Code. Claude Code gets the
advisory on stderr with exit 2 and wakes the model with it. Those three read exit 2 as a
deny, a message for the user alone, or a blocking error, so there the hook exits 0 and
hands the model the same lines as added context
(other harnesses).
--sparse .claude-plugin plugin checks out the two small directories the plugin ships
from. Without it Claude Code clones the whole repository under a 120-second clone
timeout, which one measured add ran out of. A marketplace added without --sparse
keeps that full clone; claude plugin marketplace remove crapkit drops it and uninstalls
the plugin, and the two lines above put both back.
A repo with no crapkit.toml costs a silent no-op per edit: 68 ms on Windows through the
crapkit.exe launcher, where a bare python -c pass took 32 ms on the same machine. Every
edit starts it, whatever the file type; an edit to a type crapkit does not measure stops at
a suffix check before any config is read. On Windows, Claude Code starts the hook through
Git Bash, whose own startup comes on top, and runs it async, so no edit waits for it. After
upgrading the CLI, refresh the marketplace before updating the installed plugin:
claude plugin marketplace update crapkit
claude plugin update crapkit@crapkit --scope user
crapkit doctor --plugin-rootThe installed plugin moves only at a release. claude plugin update compares version
strings, and main carries the last release's version until the next one, so between
releases it reports the plugin up to date. Restart existing Claude Code sessions to apply
the plugin update. The check above compares installed files with the CLI on PATH; it does
not reload a running session. When they disagree it prints the commands for the side that
is behind, and when claude plugin update answered "already at the latest version" over
files main has moved past, it prints the uninstall and install lines that replace them. The update above is for a user-scope
install. For one made with --scope project or --scope local, doctor names that scope and
the project directory to run it in; for a plugin installed from a marketplace you added as a
local directory, which Claude Code loads in place, it names git -C <that directory> pull.
A headless claude -p has no one to grant a tool call, so it refuses every crapkit call
and the model reads Claude requested permissions to use ..., but you haven't granted it yet. Pass --allowedTools mcp__plugin_crapkit_crapkit for the plugin's server, or
--allowedTools mcp__crapkit for one you added yourself.
The hook registers on Edit|Write, which is every write that names a file. An agent that
writes its source through a shell heredoc names none, so a Bash event is judged off the
working tree instead. That half is yours to register, because it costs two
git spawns per shell call. Add a second PostToolUse entry to your own settings, same
command, matcher Bash:
{
"hooks": {
"PostToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Bash",
"hooks": [
{ "type": "command", "command": "crapkit claude-hook --protocol 1", "timeout": 20 }
]
}
]
}
}The cost is one git rev-parse --show-toplevel and one git status --porcelain -z -uall
per shell call in any git repo, whether or not crapkit measures it: about 50 ms together
on crapkit's own checkout on Windows, and more on a bigger tree. What comes back is the dirty or
untracked *.py files written in the last 12 seconds, 25 at most, each judged the way an
edit is. Python only, so a TypeScript or Go repo pays the two spawns and hears nothing.
The hook remembers, per Claude Code session, the bytes each judgement read: one small
record per file under .git/crapkit/claude-hook/<session_id>/, and a session idle for 7
days is pruned when another one starts. A recent file whose bytes match its record is
skipped, so a touch, a rewrite of the same bytes, or a test run right after an Edit
does not repeat an advisory the session already heard. Content that arrives with an old
mtime is never judged by the Bash half: a file moved or copied in (mv, cp -p, an
unpacked archive), or one a long command wrote well before it returned. The commit gate
still judges those.
Codex
Codex 0.131.0 or newer installs the same marketplace's plugin through its own manager;
0.130.0 has no codex plugin add:
codex plugin marketplace add https://github.com/JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit.git --ref v0.8.1 --sparse .claude-plugin --sparse plugin
codex plugin add crapkit@crapkitUse the three skills and MCP server in Codex. Codex loads no crapkit hook: the plugin's
Codex manifest leaves hooks out, because Codex reports an edit as apply_patch patch text,
which the advisory does not read. Codex offers crapkit and crapkit-recover to the model
by itself; crapkit-onboard stays out of the model's list until you type
$crapkit:crapkit-onboard, as Claude Code waits for /crapkit:crapkit-onboard. A plugin
from 0.8.0 or earlier ships no Codex manifest: Codex 0.156.1 lists its hooks as untrusted
PostToolUse hooks that run a bare crapkit, and they should stay untrusted.
--ref pins the marketplace to this release's tag, and crapkit's release step rewrites
it to the tag it cuts. Codex 0.156.1 checks every Git marketplace each time it starts
and reinstalls the marketplace's plugins when it moved. Added without a ref, the marketplace
follows main, and a push to main moves the plugin past the CLI you installed from PyPI
with no command from you. --sparse fetches the two small directories the plugin ships
from rather than the whole repository.
A marketplace added at a tag stays there: codex plugin marketplace upgrade keeps it
at that tag. After upgrading the CLI, remove the marketplace, add it at the new tag,
and install the plugin again. The listing's --json needs Codex 0.137.0; drop it on an
older Codex.
codex plugin marketplace remove crapkit
codex plugin marketplace add https://github.com/JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit.git --ref v0.8.1 --sparse .claude-plugin --sparse plugin
codex plugin add crapkit@crapkit
codex plugin list --marketplace crapkit --jsonThe installed plugin moves only at a release. Removing the marketplace keeps it, and it
stays at the old version until codex plugin add installs the new one. The same four
lines move a marketplace added without --ref onto the tag.
Check the installed Codex plugin with crapkit doctor --plugin-root: with no PATH it
reads Codex's plugin cache when Claude Code has no install, and PATH names one install
under ~/.codex/plugins/cache/crapkit/crapkit/. A gap there names these refresh lines,
never a claude command.
See plugin upgrades
for choosing that path and starting a fresh MCP session. A runtime with a skills
directory but no compatible marketplace can copy plugin/skills/* into it instead:
~/.claude/skills for Claude Code, $CODEX_HOME/skills (~/.codex/skills by default)
for Codex, ~/.gemini/skills for Gemini CLI. Gemini CLI lists crapkit-onboard to its
model with the other two; gemini skills disable crapkit-onboard --scope user takes it out
once the repo is adopted.
Other agents
Every other agent starts crapkit mcp from its own config file, and each one reads its own
key and fields. The mcpServers block Cursor takes starts nothing in OpenCode, Amp or VS
Code's .vscode/mcp.json, and none of them says so; in Gemini CLI it connects, but a
headless gemini -p offers the model none of the tools without "trust": true.
Wiring crapkit into your agent
gives the block for each of 27 agents, Gemini CLI, Goose, Zed and Continue among them, with
the file it goes in and where the agent starts the server.
Languages
14 languages, two coverage parsers. Coverage joins where a parser exists; everything else scores on complexity alone.
Language | Files | Coverage |
Python |
| coverage.py |
TypeScript |
| istanbul |
TSX |
| istanbul |
JavaScript |
| istanbul |
Vue |
| istanbul, when your vitest run reports on |
Swift |
| none: cc-only |
Go |
| none: cc-only |
Rust |
| none: cc-only |
shell |
| none: cc-only |
PowerShell |
| none: cc-only |
C and C++ |
| none: cc-only |
Objective-C |
| none: cc-only |
Java |
| none: cc-only |
Zig |
| none: cc-only |
A cc-only scope declares coverage_optional = true, scores crap = ccn, and needs no
lane. Nothing about it is provisional: the ceiling still binds and the gate still refuses
a function over it. Add a coverage lane the day a parser exists and the same scope starts
joining coverage.
crapkit init writes that key itself, on every scope whose languages all lack a parser,
and leaves it off any scope a lane could still measure. So the 60-second start above runs
unchanged on a Go, Rust or shell repo: crapkit coverage scores it with no lane at all,
and that run is the baseline worklist, next-item, ratchet seed and verify read.
Shell, PowerShell and Rust run on crapkit's own readers. lizard ships none for shell or
PowerShell, so crapkit counts their functions itself, and reads the command inside a
quoted "$(...)" as code: its &&, ||, -and and -or count as they do written
bare. lizard's Rust reader scores a 7-arm match as ccn 2 (filed as lizard #494), so crapkit counts each non-wildcard arm like a C
case. It also reads a Rust signature, a closure's empty ||, a let-else and a for
that is no loop the way Rust means them (see
per-language
gotchas),
and retires each correction the day upstream fixes it. It lists #[inline] fn f() {
written on one line, which lizard took for a C preprocessor line. The cognitive column charges a
match once, the way Sonar charges a switch. The Rust, shell and PowerShell readers count each match, case or switch arm in the modified column too, so both columns agree and the arms are gated: a seven-arm match gates at ccn 8, where lizard's modified count, and so the gated ccn, of a C switch with seven cases is 2.
Go and Zig read through crapkit's subclasses of lizard's readers, which end a signature
where the language does. A function type such as var cb func(int) error opens no
function, a result type's braces are not the body, and a parameter of function type counts
once.
Python and Swift read through crapkit's subclasses of lizard's readers too. lizard's Python
reader ends a def at the first ) of a signature that runs past it, so crapkit reads the
signature to the body's colon. lizard's Swift reader takes super.init(...), r.get() and
Socket(protocol: p) for declarations and #fileID for the start of a preprocessor line,
which hid the functions after them, and lists no function named by a raw identifier with a
space in it (func `keeps onboarding if offline`()), so crapkit reads each one as the
name or literal it is. It also reads the expression in a string's \( ) as code, which
lizard read as part of the string.
C, C++, Objective-C and Java run on lizard's readers with crapkit's fixes on top. lizard
hid every function after some constructs, named rows after an attribute or a macro, and
left unnamed and array parameters out of params; the
per-language notes
list what crapkit reads differently.
Expression arrows in arrays and argument lists are measured separately. In TypeScript,
wrap an arrow body in parentheses when it contains < before a comma, such as
x => (pair<T,U>(x)) or x => (x < 0). Without that delimiter, analysis refuses
the file because this reader cannot distinguish type arguments from an expression
separator. A run scores the refused file as zero functions and names it, and every gate
refuses it once a change touches it (The gate). Generic arrow parameter
declarations remain supported.
Functions on the same line have separate occurrence identifiers. Existing ratchet marks with ambiguous old identities require a reviewed mapping; see same-line function identity.
The gate
Use the advisory while editing, the gate when committing, and verify for the
full verdict. The preview and hooks differ in what their available evidence can prove:
Surface | Fires | Power |
| after an agent's edit lands | advisory. Names the breach to the agent: on stderr in Claude Code, as added context in Cursor, Copilot CLI and VS Code. Blocks nothing, because PostToolUse runs after the write |
| when you ask, after the first coverage run | preview. A stricter preview of the commit gate, sub-second, before you stage: a ratchet mark pardons a function only while its CRAP is at or under the mark. With no run behind it, exit 1 and |
|
| blocks. The hook exits 6; git reports 1. Inside a commit it judges the staged blobs only, so it costs the size of the commit and needs no coverage. Run outside a commit with nothing staged, as |
| before you push, and in CI | the verdict. Gate, ratchet, new test failures, diff coverage, against the trusted baseline |
Both hooks pardon a function that the marks file in the working tree carries a mark for,
whether or not that mark is staged or committed, so touching signed debt never refuses a
commit. In CI the file on disk is the committed one, so verify there fails a function
whose mark never reached a commit. verify is also what fails a mark that rises. Since 0.4.5
its gate pardons a touched function whose fresh CRAP sits at or under its mark, the
rule rescore --gate already applied; push it past the mark and the gate fires again. The
pre-commit hook still pardons on the mark's existence alone, on purpose: a staged blob has
no coverage, so there is no fresh CRAP to compare against. It reports how many it pardoned
on stderr (staged function(s) carry a ratchet mark and were not gated), and says the same
about a staged file no [[scope]] claims, so a new top-level directory cannot go ungated
in silence.
Every gate refuses a changed file no reader could read, exit 6, because it judged none of
the functions in it: crapkit gate: 1 staged file(s) could not be read, so no function in them was judged:, then UNREAD src/a.ts: ... with the reader's reason, then what to
do. A TypeScript expression-arrow body with < before a comma is the common case; wrap the
body in parentheses or a block. claude-hook names the same file after the edit, and an
override grants nothing while one is in the change. crapkit coverage scores such a file
as zero functions and names it on stderr, and crapkit doctor WARNs about each one the
newest run could not read, so you meet the file before the commit gate refuses it. A file
the change never touched still passes, so an old unanalyzable file blocks nothing until
someone edits it.
The crapkit root can sit below the Git top. A config in packages/api gates
that package's staged files as project-relative paths such as app/m.py. A CI step
starts at the top, where no crapkit.toml is, so Route 4 and
the GitHub Action take working-directory: packages/api. Any
command other than the hook that runs at the top exits 3, and the refusal names the root
below it:
crapkit: no crapkit.toml at /repo - nothing to analyze; crapkit.toml sits below it in packages/api: pass --repo packages/apiPath and root rules
also cover absolute arguments, literal filenames and Git diff settings. Routes 1 to 3
below need no --repo in such a monorepo when you run them at the git top. Git runs the
hook there, and with no crapkit.toml at the top the gate runs in each crapkit root below
that owns a staged file and names paths from the top (packages/api/app/m.py). A commit
that stages nothing under any crapkit.toml, a docs-only commit or any commit in a repo
armed before crapkit init, passes with one note on stderr. To pin the gate to one root
instead, end each hook-precommit line of the hook below with --repo packages/api,
as in exec python -m crapkit hook-precommit --repo packages/api, and Route 3 adds
args: [--repo, packages/api] under id: crapkit-gate. Route 4's crapkit verify takes
--repo packages/api.
Route 1 and Route 2 write this hook body. It runs the first of three that the hook's
PATH offers: the crapkit command a pipx, uv tool or venv install puts there, then
uvx crapkit, then python -m crapkit:
command -v crapkit >/dev/null 2>&1 && exec crapkit hook-precommit
command -v uvx >/dev/null 2>&1 && exec uvx crapkit hook-precommit
exec python -m crapkit hook-precommitThe uvx line is what gates a machine that runs crapkit only through uvx. It runs the
release uv fetched first, or the newest one when uv has none, which need not be the
release the rest of your team runs. It also keeps the gate running after
pip uninstall crapkit on any machine with uv, so take the hook out before the package
(Removing crapkit).
Route 1's PowerShell form writes the launcher's own path instead, as that route explains.
Route 3's framework writes a hook of its own that runs crapkit hook-precommit from the
environment it installs crapkit into, and Route 4 gates in CI with no hook.
Git hands the hook the PATH of whatever ran git commit. A terminal with your venv
activated passes the venv on; an IDE or GUI client you did not start from that terminal
does not. When that PATH reaches no crapkit command, no uvx and no python that
imports crapkit, git refuses every commit. With no python at all, as on a Debian,
Ubuntu or macOS that has only python3, the hook exits 127 with
exec: python: not found. With a python that does not import crapkit, such as a system
python, it exits 1 with No module named crapkit. Spell the path out for that client:
exec /path/to/venv/bin/crapkit hook-precommit, or Scripts/crapkit.exe on Windows.
Run git config core.hooksPath before you pick a route. When it prints a directory,
set globally or by husky, lefthook or another hook manager, git runs hooks from there
and never reads .git/hooks: Route 1 arms nothing, and husky sets the path back over
Route 2's on the next npm install. Add the gate to the pre-commit file that directory
already runs. Under husky, that is crapkit hook-precommit as a line of its own in
.husky/pre-commit, with no exec: husky runs the file under sh -e, so the gate's
exit 6 stops the commit, and the lines after it still run when it passes.
Route 1: .git/hooks/pre-commit (local, not committed)
hook="$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/hooks/pre-commit"
cat > "$hook" <<'EOF'
#!/bin/sh
command -v crapkit >/dev/null 2>&1 && exec crapkit hook-precommit
command -v uvx >/dev/null 2>&1 && exec uvx crapkit hook-precommit
exec python -m crapkit hook-precommit
EOF
chmod +x "$hook"git rev-parse --git-common-dir finds the repository's .git directory from any
subdirectory and from a linked worktree, where .git is a file and cat > .git/hooks/pre-commit fails with Directory nonexistent. Every worktree runs the hook
kept there. It ignores core.hooksPath on purpose: --git-path hooks follows a global
hooks path, and would write this repo's gate into every repo on the machine.
The same hook from PowerShell. Windows PowerShell 5.1 puts a byte-order mark in front of
the shebang, UTF-16 from > and Out-File and UTF-8 from Out-File -Encoding utf8,
and git then refuses every commit with error: cannot spawn .git/hooks/pre-commit: No such file or directory (measured on git 2.43 for Windows) without ever running the
gate. PowerShell 7 writes no mark, and Set-Content -Encoding ascii writes none in
either. Git runs the hook with its own sh, so the launcher's path is spelled with
forward slashes and quoted, and no chmod is needed on Windows:
$crapkit = (Get-Command crapkit -ErrorAction Stop).Source -replace '\\', '/'
$hook = "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/hooks/pre-commit"
Set-Content -Path $hook -Encoding ascii -NoNewline -Value "#!/bin/sh`nexec '$crapkit' hook-precommit`n"This hook names the crapkit your shell finds today, so a GUI client that never saw your
venv runs the same one. It has no uvx line: while that path is gone, as after you move the
install or pip uninstall crapkit, every commit stops on
.git/hooks/pre-commit: line 2: .../crapkit.exe: No such file or directory. Paste the
block again after you move or rebuild that install.
Get-Command stops the block when no crapkit is on PATH (a uvx-only machine): install
one with uv tool install crapkit or pipx install crapkit, or write the sh form above
from Git Bash.
crapkit doctor warns when the hook file git would spawn starts with a byte-order mark,
and when a core.hooksPath set elsewhere (a global one, or husky's .husky/_) sends git
away from .git/hooks, where git then runs no hook at all.
PowerShell 5.1's > writes UTF-16 behind the same mark wherever it saves a file, and crapkit
reads each such file as far as the program that owns it can:
A source file saved that way scores its functions as its UTF-8 twin does. git diffs it as binary, so
crapkit doctornames it in a note.A
.gitignorein UTF-16 is one git cannot read.initnames it on stderr with the fix and leaves it as it was.A root
package.jsonin UTF-16 is oneinitwill not guess a lane from: it exits 3 before it writes any file, naming the file and the fix.The marks file (
crapkit-ratchet.tsv) saved that way reads as its rows, and a write puts it back in UTF-16 behind its mark and in its own line endings. A mark whose name holds a cp1252 byte reads with that byte as U+FFFD, andratchet seed,prune,move,merge,verify's tighten and both overrides refuse at exit 3, naming the byte, rather than save U+FFFD in place of the name: how the marks file is read.
Set-Content -Encoding utf8 saves any of them as UTF-8.
Route 2: a committed hooks directory
The whole route, from a repo that has no githooks/ yet:
mkdir -p githooks
cat > githooks/pre-commit <<'EOF'
#!/bin/sh
command -v crapkit >/dev/null 2>&1 && exec crapkit hook-precommit
command -v uvx >/dev/null 2>&1 && exec uvx crapkit hook-precommit
exec python -m crapkit hook-precommit
EOF
chmod +x githooks/pre-commit
printf 'githooks/pre-commit text eol=lf\n' >> .gitattributes
git add .gitattributes githooks/pre-commit
git update-index --chmod=+x githooks/pre-commit
git commit -m "add crapkit gate hook"
git config core.hooksPath githooksPowerShell stops that block at its heredoc, before any hook is written, and the next commit goes through ungated. From PowerShell, the same route:
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force githooks | Out-Null
Set-Content -Path githooks/pre-commit -Encoding ascii -NoNewline -Value "#!/bin/sh`ncommand -v crapkit >/dev/null 2>&1 && exec crapkit hook-precommit`ncommand -v uvx >/dev/null 2>&1 && exec uvx crapkit hook-precommit`nexec python -m crapkit hook-precommit`n"
Add-Content -Path .gitattributes -Encoding ascii -Value 'githooks/pre-commit text eol=lf'
git add .gitattributes githooks/pre-commit
git update-index --chmod=+x githooks/pre-commit
git commit -m "add crapkit gate hook"
git config core.hooksPath githooksThe committed hook keeps the PATH lookup rather than one machine's launcher path, since every clone runs it.
The --chmod goes between the add and the commit. It writes the executable bit to
the index, so a commit that already happened does not carry it: run it after and git ls-tree HEAD still says 100644, which is a hook Unix checkouts silently skip. The
.gitattributes line is the harder half of the same failure: under Windows' default
core.autocrlf the hook checks out CRLF and #!/bin/sh\r dies on Linux and macOS with a
bad-interpreter error. crapkit doctor warns when a file under core.hooksPath is not
100755 in the index and prints the update-index line for it.
Git will not read a hooks path out of a committed file, so that git config line belongs
in your CONTRIBUTING setup steps. Every clone arms the gate with it. crapkit doctor names
a clone that skipped it:
WARN githooks/pre-commit runs crapkit's gate, but core.hooksPath is unset and git runs .git/hooks/pre-commit, so every commit here skips the gate without a word; run `git config core.hooksPath githooks` in this repo, or call crapkit hook-precommit from .git/hooks/pre-commitAfter husky's npm install takes core.hooksPath back to .husky/_, the same WARN names
.husky/pre-commit as the file to call crapkit from.
Route 3: the pre-commit framework
crapkit ships a .pre-commit-hooks.yaml declaring id: crapkit-gate. In your
.pre-commit-config.yaml:
repos:
- repo: https://github.com/JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit
# crapkit's release step rewrites this line to the tag it just cut
rev: v0.8.1
hooks:
- id: crapkit-gateThat file arms nothing on its own. The framework writes .git/hooks/pre-commit when you
tell it to, and until then git commit runs no gate and says nothing:
pip install pre-commit
pre-commit installpre-commit install is the line every clone needs, the way Route 2 needs its
git config core.hooksPath line. prek reads the same
.pre-commit-config.yaml: prek install arms the hook in its place, and the gate
refuses and accepts the same commits. crapkit doctor WARNs on a config naming crapkit-gate
while the hook git runs is not the one the framework writes.
pre-commit run --all-files, the form pre-commit.ci and pre-commit/action run, starts no
commit and stages nothing. Outside a commit, with nothing staged, the hook judges every
tracked file instead of a staged diff that is empty: a function over its ceiling fails
unless the marks file in the working tree marks it, which in CI is the committed file. So
a breach committed from a clone that never ran pre-commit install fails the CI job.
Inside a commit the hook judges only what is staged, as before. It tells the two apart by
GIT_INDEX_FILE, which git sets for the hooks a commit runs. For a CI gate that also
weighs coverage and the marks, use Route 4.
rev is a git ref pre-commit resolves against that remote. Pin a release tag, not a
branch: pre-commit autoupdate only moves between tags, and a moving main would change
your gate under you.
Route 4: CI
A CI job runs on a fresh clone, which has no .crapkit/ store, so bare crapkit verify
exits 1. Running coverage first would make the PR's own tree the baseline, a gate that
can never fail. The portable baseline is the mechanism:
# on the default branch, after a passing verify: commit this file
crapkit verify --emit-baseline crapkit-baseline.tsv
# in the PR job, against the committed baseline
crapkit verify --baseline-tsv crapkit-baseline.tsv --github--github emits ::error file=... annotations that land on the PR diff; --sarif PATH
writes SARIF 2.1.0 for code-scanning upload. Refresh the committed baseline whenever the
default branch's verify passes.
The file carries each lane's test count and failure list on its first line, so the PR job forgives a test that already failed on the default branch and warns when a lane runs fewer tests. A file written by crapkit 0.8.0 or older carries neither: against it every failing test is a new failure, exit 8, and verify says so and names the line that rewrites it:
warning: the baseline file crapkit-baseline.tsv holds no test results, so every test failure counts as new and no suite size is compared; write it again with `crapkit verify --emit-baseline crapkit-baseline.tsv` to carry themTwo things the job has to do before those lines run. Install crapkit, pip install crapkit, and pin the version the way Route 3 pins rev: an unpinned install moves your
gate on whatever day a release lands. Fetch the whole history. actions/checkout
clones one commit by default, verify reads the diff against the baseline's commit out of
git, and a shallow clone does not have that commit:
$ crapkit verify --baseline-tsv crapkit-baseline.tsv
crapkit: baseline commit a74260f321f is not an ancestor of HEAD in this shallow clone, which does not hold it; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallowThat is exit 4 on a git clone --depth 1 of a repo whose baseline verifies at full depth.
On a full clone that holds the commit, the same exit names the branch that holds it, or,
when no branch does, blames a rebase or an amend that rewrote history, and asks for a
fresh baseline instead. A clone that does not hold it at all, because .crapkit/ came
from another clone or from a CI cache keyed on a branch, says so and names the fetch:
$ crapkit verify
crapkit: baseline commit a74260f321f is not in this clone, so git cannot say whether it is behind HEAD; fetch it with `git fetch origin a74260f321f4e0b9d2c61a8f3e57d0c1b2a9e8f7`, or run `crapkit coverage` here for a baseline this clone holdsverify --base and hook-precommit --base look up the fork point with git merge-base,
and in the shallow clone above they refuse with exit 4 and the same fix:
$ crapkit hook-precommit --base c47a37b1df69c434ba42eec5979ddad03d2bf1e4
crapkit: git merge-base c47a37b1df69c434ba42eec5979ddad03d2bf1e4 HEAD failed in /home/runner/work/app/app: fatal: Not a valid commit name c47a37b1df69c434ba42eec5979ddad03d2bf1e4; this shallow clone does not hold every commit: set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallowWhen the clone holds both commits but not the one they fork from, the line reads
no merge base between REF and HEAD in ROOT, followed by the same fix.
ratchet report --enforce with debt_max_age_months or repayment_min_per_30d set
refuses in a shallow clone, exit 4 with the same fix: every mark reads 0 days old there and
no repayment shows, so an age limit a full clone fails would pass and a repayment quota a
full clone passes would fail.
Set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout step, which is what crapkit's own
.github/workflows/ci.yml does.
The whole PR job, on GitHub Actions:
on: pull_request
jobs:
crapkit:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0 # verify needs the baseline's commit
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: "3.12"
- run: pip install "crapkit==0.8.1"
- run: pip install -e ".[dev]" # your own test dependencies
- run: crapkit verify --baseline-tsv crapkit-baseline.tsv --githubThe second install is the one people leave out. verify reruns your lanes, so the job
needs whatever your test command needs: the coverage plugin, npm ci, a database, all of
it. Without them the lane writes no artifact and verify exits 5 quoting the runner's own
error, which is a broken job and not a verdict.
What a refusal looks like
$ git commit -m "add route"
crapkit gate: 1 staged function(s) exceed the complexity ceiling of 6:
ccn 7 app/m.py:9 route( a , b , c , d )
decompose before committing (coverage cannot save a function above the target).That commit exited 1, not 6. Git collapses any failed hook to 1, so 6 is a code you
only ever see by running the hook yourself: crapkit hook-precommit exits 6 on a
violation and 0 otherwise. The stderr block above is the same either way.
CRAPKIT_OVERRIDE_REASON is not a bypass. Setting it routes the commit through the full
three-record audit: an alert line through alert_command, a ratchet entry staged into the
commit, and a row in the override log. All three land or nothing does, and an unset
alert_command refuses the override outright. See
docs/ratchet.md.
The GitHub Action
action.yml at this repository's root is a composite action, so a reviewer sees crapkit's numbers on the pull request without installing anything. Four lines add it to a workflow, and every input has a default:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- uses: JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit@v0.8.1The whole job those four lines sit in:
on: pull_request
jobs:
crapkit:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read # actions/checkout clones the repository
pull-requests: write # the comment
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0 # the diff, and verify's baseline commit
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: "3.12" # the interpreter the install below lands in
- run: pip install -e ".[dev]" # whatever your lanes need to run
- uses: JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit@v0.8.1
with:
gate: "false"That pip install step is the one people leave out, and it is the same one Route 4 above
names: the action installs crapkit and nothing else, so your lanes still need whatever
your test command needs. Without it the lane writes no artifact and the comment says so.
fetch-depth: 0 is the other one. actions/checkout clones a single commit; the action
reads the pull request's changed files out of git and verify reads the diff against the
baseline's commit. A shallow clone lacks the base commit, so git refuses the diff: the step
logs git's error, and the comment ranks the whole repository and says why under its
heading, quoting git's first line and naming fetch-depth: 0. A shallow clone also
flattens every number counted from history: churn sees one commit per file, so the
worklist ranks on ccn alone, and a
ratchet mark's age reads as 0 days. worklist, next-item, brief and ratchet report
print one line on stderr and carry shallow: true in their JSON (false in a full clone),
and the comment repeats the worklist's line above its table:
warning: churn counts read only the commits this clone holds; this shallow clone does not hold every commit: set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallowbrief names churn counts and mark ages in that line, and ratchet report mark ages and
repayments.
The action installs crapkit from $GITHUB_ACTION_PATH, which is its own checkout of the
ref you pinned in uses:. So a pin left at last month's tag scores your tree with last
month's crapkit rather than with whatever released since, and pinning a tag is the whole
version policy; the snippets above name the current release. Move the pin in the same commit
that re-seeds the marks under a new analysis version: an Action one release behind the marks
refuses them with exit 3 on every pull request
(a team's upgrade).
What the comment looks like
One comment per pull request, edited in place on every push. A hidden
<!-- crapkit-action --> line opens it, and the next run edits the first comment that
starts with that line, so a fifteen-push branch carries one comment and not fifteen. A
reviewer's reply that quotes the comment does not start with it and is left alone. When
GitHub answers a page of the comment list with an error, the step edits the crapkit
comment it found before the error. When it found none, it lists the comments once more
before it posts fresh; if that listing fails too, it posts a fresh comment, so the pull
request still gets this push's verdict, and the job log says the listing failed twice.
On a push event there is no pull request to carry it, and the same text goes to the job
log instead.
Rendered from three saved payloads: a pull request that adds an untested route() (ccn 8)
beside a ratchet-marked legacy_router(), in a repository whose diff_uncovered_max is 3.
The payloads are under tests/fixtures/action_comment/, and the unit suite pins this block
to their render:
<!-- crapkit-action -->
## crapkit
4 functions in 2 files, 2 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 149.59, grade F.
**verify failed, exit 6: complexity gate.**
- gate: `app/calc.py:34` `route( a , b , c , d )` ccn 8, cov 0%, crap 72.0 -> decompose
- uncovered lines in `app/calc.py`: 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45
Run 3 against baseline 1, 1 changed file (`app/calc.py`): 1 gate violation, 0 ratchet regressions, 0 new test failures, 11 uncovered changed lines.
### Worklist: 1 changed file
| File | Function | ccn | risk | remedy |
|---|---|---:|---:|---|
| `app/calc.py:34` | `route( a , b , c , d )` | 8 | 4.0 | decompose |
| `app/calc.py:19` | `legacy_router( a , b , c , d , e )` | 8 | 4.0 | decompose (accepted debt) |The first line is the run crapkit coverage wrote: functions and files, how many sit over
the ceiling (over ceiling 6, or over their ceilings (6; reports 12, util 4) when scopes
set their own), CRAP load and grade, then ; scope `src` scored no function: it claims no file for each scope that scored nothing, and a failed lane's first error line appended as
; lane 'js' failed: .... When coverage --json died before a summary, the line quotes the
error object it printed instead: `crapkit coverage` exited 5: lane 'py' cannot import pytest-cov; pip install pytest-cov.
The verdict opens with the exit code and the rule it stands for (complexity gate,
ratchet regressions, new test failures, diff-coverage ceiling N), then one bullet per
finding: each gate violation with its function, ccn, coverage, CRAP and remedy; each
changed file no reader could read, as - unread: `src/a.ts`, so the gate judged none of its functions: and the reader's reason; each ratchet regression as recorded -> fresh;
each new test failure by id; and the first twenty uncovered changed lines, one bullet per
file, with a count of the rest. Each kind prints fifty bullets at most, then - and 1450 more new test failures; crapkit verify lists them all. The counts line closes it,
naming up to three of the files verify judged and counting the rest:
1 changed file (`app/calc.py`). An unread file fails the gate as a function over the ceiling does, so the counts line counts
it among the gate violations and says how many were files:
1 gate violation (1 unread file). A verify that passed is one line: **verify passed.** Run 2 against baseline 1, 7 changed files (a.py, b.py, c.py and 4 more). A verify
older than 0.8.1 lists no changed_paths, and its line gives the count alone. A lane that recorded no test results (it declares no results_artifact)
adds New test failures went unchecked in lane `py`: it recorded no test results. to
that line, and a new failure in a lane whose baseline recorded no failure list gets a
bullet of its own, - lane `py`: the baseline recorded no failure list, so its new failures may predate this change: the fork point's lane declared no results_artifact, so nothing
can tell the pull request's failures from older ones, and verify still counts them.
GitHub refuses a comment over 65,536 characters, and a pull request then gets no comment
at all. A body that still runs over (long names under a large top) is cut at the last
line that fits, the marker line still first, and ends with the comment stopped at GitHub's 65,536-character limit; the job log above holds the whole text. The step prints
the whole comment to the job log before it posts.
The rows are the ranked worklist for the files the pull request changed, worst first,
top of them, with the rows a finding names listed first. risk is ccn times churn
weight, the number crapkit worklist ranks on, and remedy is the run's own verdict for
that function: decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok. (accepted debt) marks a function the
committed ratchet carries a mark for, so an untouched legacy_router does not read like
the pull request's own new function. A pull request that touches no ranked function gets
the heading and No ranked function in these files. When crapkit worklist wrote no
ranking, the table's place says why rather than reading as an empty one: the error it
printed (`crapkit worklist` exited 1: no snapshot in ...: run `crapkit coverage` first.),
or, when it printed nothing, `crapkit worklist` printed no ranking; its error is in the job log.
The two file counts describe the same diff, counted twice. 39 changed files is
git diff --name-only --relative base.sha...HEAD run in working-directory, the
branch's own commits under it, and it is what the table is filtered to; the step's log
names up to three of them. The count on the verdict line is what verify measured from
the same fork point. With delta: "false" the second one is 0, because there is nothing
behind the checkout to measure from.
The inputs
Input | Default | What it does |
|
|
|
|
| scores the pull request's base commit first, so the verdict covers the commits the pull request adds. Costs a second lane run; |
|
| worklist rows rendered in the table. An empty value renders 5. A value that is not a whole number ( |
|
| the interpreter |
|
| the directory that holds |
On a monorepo whose crapkit.toml sits in packages/api, the crapkit step takes
working-directory: packages/api under with:, and the job's own pip install -e ".[dev]" step takes the same key at step level, because .[dev] names that package's
pyproject.toml and the top has none. The changed files are then listed from
packages/api, the way the worklist names them, and a change elsewhere in the
repository is not part of the table. Point it at the directory that holds
crapkit.toml itself, not at one below it. The input is new in 0.8.1: an action pinned
to an older tag warns Unexpected input(s) 'working-directory' and scores the top.
gate: "false" is the default on purpose. A team adopts the action before it has decided
which findings should stop a merge, and a check that fails on day one gets turned off on
day two.
What the verdict line covers
On a pull request, the commits the pull request adds. The action scores the fork point
first, then the checkout, then runs crapkit verify --base <fork>, which measures the
diff from there and takes the fork point's run as its baseline. So the gate judges the
functions in the diff a reviewer is reading, and a repository that was already over its
ceiling before the branch started does not fail every pull request that touches it.
The fork point is git merge-base of base.sha and HEAD, not base.sha itself.
base.sha is the base branch's tip when the event fired, so a base branch that moved
after the branch forked carries commits HEAD never saw, and a run there would be neither
the baseline verify wants nor a diff anyone is reviewing.
The base run happens in a detached worktree under RUNNER_TEMP, in the same
working-directory inside it, and its store is copied over the checkout's so both runs
sit in one place. The cost is two lane runs on a pull request: your suite runs once
at the fork point and once on the checkout. Set delta: "false" to skip the base run,
and the verdict falls back to the checkout against its own run, which reports the tree's
own health and judges no changed function. The comment says so in place of
verify passed:
**verify judged no changed function:** the base run was not made (no base commit). Run 2 against baseline 2, 0 changed files.Three things leave the base run unmade: a shallow clone that does not hold the fork
point, a fork point older than your crapkit.toml, and a lane that will not run against
that tree. The step logs crapkit base scoring exited N and writes the reason to
crapkit-base.reason in the words the comment then quotes, shallow clone does not hold the fork point of <sha>; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout, no usable crapkit.toml at the fork point <sha>: ..., or lane failed at the fork point <sha>: ... with the first
lane '<name>' FAILED: line crapkit printed, so a warning from a lane that passed never
stands in for the lane that failed. A crapkit that died printing nothing reads crapkit coverage exited <code> and printed nothing. The verdict falls back the same way delta: "false" does, and the
ratchet still runs, so exit 7 there is a finding. What differs is the job's status. With
gate: "true" on a pull request whose base run was attempted and not made, the exit step
exits 1 and prints the reason, because actions/checkout's default depth-1 clone would
otherwise turn every pull request into a green check that judged nothing. A push event
and delta: "false" never attempt the base run, so they keep verify's own code; a push
has no base commit and no pull request to comment on.
One requirement the base run adds: the lane has to measure the tree it runs in. A lane
that reaches an installed copy of your package instead of the checkout will measure the
pull request's code while standing on the base commit, and the two runs then describe the
same tree. crapkit verify refuses a run whose artifact names files outside the tree
(exit 5), which catches the loud version of this; a lane pinned to a path outside the
worktree is the quiet one. Point the lane at the tree, or set delta: "false".
--reuse-artifacts is what keeps each of those runs to one pass of your suite. coverage
ran the lanes moments earlier on that tree, and verify parses those artifacts rather than
running the whole suite a second time for the same numbers.
Which is why crapkit coverage has to exit 0 for there to be a verdict. When it exits
anything else (a lane that failed, an artifact it refused), the action does not run
verify: on a runner that keeps its workspace between jobs (clean: false), a
verify --reuse-artifacts over a failed measurement read the artifact the dead lane had
left from an earlier run, passed over it, and made that run the trusted baseline. The
comment then carries coverage's failure in place of the verdict:
**no verdict: `crapkit coverage` exited 5 (lane 'py' failed: lane 'py' wrote no artifact on its last attempt; the .crapkit/cov/py.json on disk predates it); verify did not run.**The parenthesis is the first line of the lane failure the summary carries. When every
lane failed, coverage prints an error object instead of a summary and the lane errors
are only in the job log, and the line says so: (every lane failed (1 of 1); the lane errors are in the job log). When coverage printed nothing at all, it crashed or was
killed before it could: (it printed no run summary, so it crashed or was killed before scoring; its error is in the job log). When coverage refused files a scope takes whose
names are not UTF-8, the parenthesis names the first and counts the rest, and one bullet
under the line names each file the error object lists in unread_files:
- refused: `src/caf\xe9.py`: its name is not UTF-8, .... When the directory coverage
ran in holds no crapkit.toml, the parenthesis names that directory and ends set the action's `working-directory` input to the directory that holds crapkit.toml. With
gate: "true" the job exits with coverage's code.
The other gate that judges a delta is the portable baseline in Route 4:
commit crapkit-baseline.tsv on the default branch and run crapkit verify --baseline-tsv crapkit-baseline.tsv in a step of your own. It needs no second lane run, and it needs
someone to keep that file current.
The comment is posted with gh api and the job's own GITHUB_TOKEN, which needs
pull-requests: write, and contents: read for the checkout once the job names any
permission: naming one sets every other to none. Two things it cannot do: a pull request
from a fork gets a read-only token, so the POST is a 403 there, and a self-hosted runner
without the gh CLI on PATH posts nothing. In both cases the step stays green, logs gh's
exit code, and leaves the rendered text in the job log.
Subcommands
crapkit clean --dry-run --json previews abandoned temporary mutation recovery. See
resource policies
for shared analysis workers, process lifetime and bounded logs.
Every subcommand takes --repo PATH, and the flag goes after the subcommand. Without
it the root is the nearest crapkit.toml at or above the current directory
(ADR 0002): from a
monorepo workspace crapkit worklist reads the root configuration that claims the
workspace, says crapkit: using crapkit.toml at /repo on stderr, and reads a relative path
argument from where you stand. claude-hook is the one exception: it has no --repo,
because it takes its root from the file named in the hook payload it reads.
$ crapkit worklist --repo /path/to/repo --scope util --top 1
worklist @ a7c5c85ac37 (run 1, floor ccn>=5, churn 12mo) - 1 of 3 active (--top 1), 0 dormant
risk 5.4 ccn 5 crap 30.0 cov 0% 5c/1a util/stats.py:1 bucket( value , low , high )
-> next: crapkit next-itemBefore it, argparse reads the path as the subcommand name and exits 2 without ever
mentioning --repo:
$ crapkit --repo /path/to/repo worklist --top 1
crapkit: error: argument command: invalid choice: '/path/to/repo' (choose from 'inventory', 'coverage', ...)--json prints one sorted-keys JSON object on stdout, always carrying a schema field.
Command | What it does |
| Recovers abandoned temporary mutation worktrees. Preserves active runs and intentional mutation pools. |
| Sniffs tracked source into per-directory scopes, writes a self-validated starter |
| Checks the config still describes the repo: unknown keys (with the accepted spellings), zero-file scopes, tracked source no scope claims, scopes no lane covers, lane cwds and commands that no longer resolve, lizard importable, oversized files. It FAILs a lane whose runner does not resolve or that the shell cannot start, a |
| One lizard pass over every in-scope file into a SQLite snapshot run, cached by content hash. |
| Runs the lanes, joins branch coverage onto a fresh inventory, writes a scored run. A failed lane is recorded, not fatal: its scopes fall back to |
| The full verdict against the trusted baseline: gate on touched functions, ratchet, no new test failures, optional diff-coverage ceiling. The three baseline selectors are mutually exclusive; |
| The risk map: every admitted function ranked by |
| The actionable queue as JSON, with churn, budget estimates and uncovered lines. Same run and same admission floor as |
| The open claims, and the way to hand one back without waiting for a verify. |
| The start-editing packet for one function: its own |
| A function's score across runs plus its mark. |
| Fresh complexity for named files over the latest run's stale coverage, joined by name. A function on a line span another one shares, and a Python def whose body starts on the line its signature ends, scores untested, as the coverage run scores it. A function the run holds no row for (added or renamed since) or one in a scope no lane measures prints |
| The mark lifecycle: seed new debt, prune gone code (a mark whose file git renamed follows it, and the prune line names up to three renames it followed; when this clone lacks the commit the renames start from and a marked file left before the oldest commit it holds, prune exits 4 and writes nothing), merge as a git driver, move re-paths marks, report reads burn-down from the file's own git history. |
| Run history, and retention. |
| The override audit trail: who granted what, when, and why. |
| Totals per trusted run: functions, over-target count, CRAP load, average, per-scope rollup. It reads a per-run rollup table rather than rescanning every scored row, and fills that table for any run missing one, so it writes to the store (best effort: a read-only |
| The delta between the two newest runs with identical lane sets. Silent when nothing changed. Past the totals line it names up to five functions of each kind: those whose CRAP rose by more than 0.01, largest rise first; new functions over their ceiling, highest CRAP first; and functions that were over their ceiling and dropped by more than 0.01, largest drop first. Moves and scores equal to 4 decimal places list by path. An over-ceiling function the older run holds no row for reads |
| One self-contained HTML page written to |
| Near-duplicate functions by normalized line shingles with containment scoring. Defaults: |
| File pairs that keep landing in the same commits. Defaults: |
| Diff-scoped mutation testing: flips comparisons, boundary shifts, boolean connectives and boolean literals on changed lines, runs |
| Runs each owning scope's |
| The cc-only gate on staged blobs. No coverage, no snapshot, no repo-wide cache. Exit 6 on a violation, and on a staged file no reader could read, named on an |
| Reads one PostToolUse payload from stdin, as Claude Code, Copilot CLI, Cursor or VS Code sends it, and judges each file it edited: ccn against the scope ceiling, on functions the edit changed, minus functions a ratchet mark already covers. Advisory only: the edit has landed, and |
| Rescores the files your scopes claim when their content changes (default every 2s, subprocess-isolated so a half-saved syntax error never kills the watcher). Each poll lists the tracked and untracked files under the scope paths again, so a file created while it runs is rescored too. A file whose mtime moved is read and rescored only when its bytes differ, so a touch or an editor saving the same bytes rescores nothing; an edit written under the file's old mtime ( |
| The help git, npm and docker answer to. With no TOPIC it prints the command list; with one it prints that subcommand's own help, the same page as |
| A stdio MCP server with no extra dependency, exposing twelve read-side tools named |
Reading the output
Every line crapkit writes from its own words is ASCII, so $x = crapkit doctor or
$x = crapkit worklist 2>&1 in Windows PowerShell 5.1 captures it intact under any
console code page. A path or function name crapkit quotes keeps its own characters and
goes out as UTF-8; to capture one of those, set
[Console]::OutputEncoding = [Text.Encoding]::UTF8 first.
Flags: why a coverage number is missing
Flag | Meaning | Scored |
| A lane artifact spoke about this function. | Real |
| A lane covers the scope, but its artifact is silent on this function, which normally means no test imports the file. |
|
| A lane's artifact measured the file and was told to leave this function out: |
|
| No lane's |
|
| The scope sets |
|
The coverage summary counts all five as measured / untested / excluded / no_lane /
cc_only.
Remedy: what to do about it
Remedy | Condition | Action |
|
| Split it. No amount of coverage clears this. |
|
| Put each definition on its own lines, then measure again. Coverage cannot tell functions on one line apart, so the score stays at uncovered whatever the tests do. A one-line Python def shares its line with its |
|
| Cover the branches. |
|
| Nothing. |
The comparison is made on the exact CRAP, not on the float that computes it. CRAP(18, 2/3)
is exactly 30, and its float is 30.000000000000004; at target = 30 it reads ok. The
over-target count, the grade, ratchet seed and verify's gate judge it the same way.
Grade and CRAP load
The grade is the share of functions over their ceiling: A+ at exactly zero, A under
2%, B under 5%, C under 10%, D under 20%, F at 20% or more. crap_load beside it
is the sum of every function's CRAP score, so it moves when a function gets better even if
the letter does not. It is added exactly (math.fsum) and rounded once to 2 dp, so the
order the rows come in and the Python or SQLite version never move it. Both are taken over the scopes the run measured: a scope
whose lane failed or was left out by --lane scores at the cov-0 stand-in and reports
its load under by_scope only. trend, coverage, the digest
and brief's file totals print the same load for the same rows.
Risk: what ranks the worklist
risk = ccn * churn weight. The weight is a time-weighted sum over the file's commits in
the churn window: each commit contributes a logistic weight rising to 0.5 for the newest
commit in the log and falling to near zero for the oldest, so five edits last month
outrank fifty from two years ago. The window reaches churn_window_months back from
HEAD's commit date, never from the wall clock, so a fixed tree ranks identically forever.
Age is not the input, position in the log is. A log whose commits all share one timestamp has no range to weight against, so each commit counts once: a one-commit repo weighs every file 1.0, ranks by ccn, and promotes nothing under the floor, because a top 10% of equal weights would be every file. Commits minutes apart already rank. This repo was eight commits old, all made the same day:
$ crapkit worklist --scope util
worklist @ a7c5c85ac37 (run 1, floor ccn>=5, churn 12mo) - 3 of 3 active (worklist_top 50), 0 dormant
risk 5.4 ccn 5 crap 30.0 cov 0% 5c/1a util/stats.py:1 bucket( value , low , high )
risk 4.5 ccn 9 crap 90.0 cov 0% 1c/1a util/curve.py:1 curve( scores , mode , floor , ceiling , skip_none )
risk 4.3 ccn 4 crap 4.2 cov 75% 5c/1a util/stats.py:13 spread( values , cap ) ok
-> next: crapkit next-itembucket at ccn 5 outranks curve at ccn 9 because five commits touched it and one
touched curve. That is the whole point of weighting by churn. spread carries the ok
marker: already at or under its ceiling, listed anyway, and next-item would not hand it
out.
The list splits in two: active (files with commits in the window) and dormant
(zero churn, kept out of the queue but counted). Two rules reach under the
worklist_floor. A file whose churn weight sits in the top 10% is promoted down to ccn 3,
which is why spread appears above at ccn 4. And a function over its ceiling is admitted
whatever its ccn, so the floor can never hold back debt.
The trusted baseline
Every verify measures the working tree against one earlier run, the trusted
baseline. crapkit runs list marks which one that is today.
Which runs qualify. A coverage run, or a verify that passed. A failed verify
never qualifies, and neither does a partial run (a lane failed, so some scope fell back
to no-lane) nor a hook override record, which carries no scored rows at all. In runs list, verdict=- marks a run that produces no verdict rather than one that failed: only
verify renders a verdict. Four readers ask this one question and get this one answer: the
baseline pick here, ratchet seed, prune, and the tighten damping that compares a mark
against the same commit's previous run. A mark can no longer be signed off a run verify
refused.
What advances it. Any qualifying run whose commit is at or behind HEAD. coverage
writes one wherever HEAD is, so a dashboard cron advances the baseline exactly as CI does.
A passing verify advances it and tightens the ratchet on the way.
A run on another branch never serves. The store keeps every branch's runs, and after
git checkout main the newest qualifying run can be a feature branch's. verify, ratchet seed, ratchet prune and runs list all skip it and read the newest qualifying run in
main's own history. When no qualifying run sits behind HEAD, verify exits 4 and says why
the newest one does not: it was made on a branch HEAD does not contain (run coverage on
this branch), or a rebase or an amend rewrote its commit.
The taint rule. A failed verify recorded findings against a tree. Until some
verify passes, runs made after that failure do not become the baseline: choosing one
would move the comparison point past the findings, the flagged function would stop
counting as touched, and nothing would look at it again. verify says which run it
refused and falls back to the newest run in front of the failure.
$ crapkit runs list
run 1 @ 88012a148f6 2026-08-23T09:27:46Z coverage verdict=- lanes=py baseline
run 2 @ 803bdde8556 2026-08-23T09:27:53Z verify verdict=FAILED lanes=py
run 3 @ 803bdde8556 2026-08-23T09:28:02Z coverage verdict=- lanes=py
$ crapkit verify
warning: run 3 is not the baseline: verify run 2 FAILED with 1 finding(s) and no passing verify has cleared it since - measuring against run 1 @ 88012a148f6 instead, so those findings stay visible. Fix them, or pass `--baseline 3` to accept the newer run deliberately.
verify FAILED @ d89068de7f3 vs baseline 88012a148f6 (2 changed files)
changed files: calc/legacy.py, tests/test_legacy.py
GATE crap 72.0 ccn 8 cov 0% calc/legacy.py:7 legacy_router( a , b , c , d , e ) -> decompose
findings: 1 committed / 0 dirty (uncommitted edits and untracked files)Run 3 is a coverage run somebody took on the tree run 2 refused, and it scores the same
ccn-8 function. Without the rule it would have become the baseline, legacy_router would
have stopped being a touched function, and that gate line would never print again.
A baseline with no test results for a lane. A trusted run can hold a lane with no
test count and no failure list: the lane declared no results_artifact then,
coverage --reuse-artifacts found its junit gone or unreadable, or a crapkit older than
0.8.1 stored a verify --reuse-artifacts run over such a junit. verify does not read that as a
suite of zero tests that failed nothing. It compares that lane with the newest trusted run
at or behind the baseline's commit that recorded it, and the line names that run:
warning: lane 'py': baseline run 2 recorded no test results, so its failures are compared with run 1's
warning: lane 'py' runs 8 fewer tests than run 1 (baseline run 2 recorded no test count for it)When no run recorded a failure list for the lane, each of its failures still counts as
new, exit 8, and a line says it may predate the change; verify --json lists the lane
under lanes_without_baseline_results.
A junit this verify cannot read. verify --reuse-artifacts over a lane that declares
a results_artifact it finds missing or unreadable exits 5 and stores no run, the exit a
real run of that lane gets for the same file. The refusal names the lane and the file and
ends run verify without --reuse-artifacts so the lane writes it again. Before 0.8.1 that
verify passed at exit 0 with no test checked and stored a passing run, which became the
next baseline. The Action never reaches this case: its coverage step runs the lanes and
refuses the same junit first. coverage --reuse-artifacts over that junit still warns and
scores on. A lane that declares no results_artifact passes with a stderr line, and
verify --json lists it under lanes_without_results.
The escape, twice. Fix the findings and let a verify pass, which clears the taint
for good. Or accept the newer run on purpose with verify --baseline 3: an explicit id
bypasses the rule, and the run history records which run the verdict used. Nothing here
touches a repo that has never run verify: with no failure to protect, coverage alone
always advances the baseline.
ratchet seed --baseline ID and ratchet prune --baseline ID take the same name as
verify --baseline ID, admitted by the same rule. When a failed verify pins seed to a run
it cannot read or sign, that is the way out
(docs/ratchet.md).
When the id you pass cannot serve. A --baseline ID naming a real run that is not a
candidate says which run it is, why, and which ones can:
$ crapkit verify --baseline 3
crapkit: run 3 is an inventory run (no coverage was measured) and cannot serve as a baseline; trusted runs: 1, 2; pass `--baseline 2` for the newestExit codes
Code | Meaning |
0 | OK. For |
1 | Overloaded. Three unrelated things, listed below the table. |
2 | Usage error from argparse: unknown flag, missing positional. Raised before crapkit's own error handling. |
3 | Config error: |
4 | Git error: not a repository, a repository with no commit yet, one git refuses to open (the refusal quotes git's own fix, such as a |
5 | Tool error: lizard not importable, a lane that produced no artifact, one that measured a different tree, one that measured this tree and reported it in absolute paths (the join is root-relative, so those match nothing either; the refusal names the runner's own switch, |
6 | Gate violation. A function the diff touched is over its ceiling and past any ratchet mark it carries: an edit that leaves a marked function at or under its mark is the debt the repo signed for and is pardoned. Also |
7 | Ratchet regression the diff never touched. A marked function scores worse than its recorded high-water mark; a touched one past its mark reports 6. |
8 | New test failures against the baseline run. Failures the baseline already had do not count, against a |
9 | Diff-coverage ceiling breached: |
Exit 1 means one of three things
CI cannot tell a crash from a clean policy verdict on the code alone. Which one you got depends on the command:
Command | What exit 1 means |
| A |
| The debt policy was breached. Also a verdict. In a shallow clone, with a debt key set, it judges nothing and exits 4. |
anything else | An unexpected error: "no snapshot yet, run |
verify reports the first of 6, 7, 8, 9 that fires, in that order. A gate violation
and a ratchet regression together report 6. A run that takes any of them fails, so it
neither advances the baseline nor tightens the ratchet, exit 9 included.
Quickstart: Python
A repo with calc/grade.py, tests/test_grade.py, and a pyproject.toml. Commit first;
crapkit reads git ls-files. Install the coverage plugin first, because the lane init
writes runs pytest --cov and those flags come from pytest-cov:
pip install pytest-cov "coverage>=7.13.1"Quote the coverage requirement, or the shell reads > as a redirect. Without it, pip
keeps an older coverage.py the venv already holds, since pytest-cov accepts it, and the
lane fails at exit 5 on its report.
(pip install "crapkit[py]" pulls both at once when crapkit shares the suite's venv.)
If your suite drives its own CLI through subprocess.run, add [tool.coverage.run] patch = ["subprocess"] to pyproject.toml and keep coverage>=7.13.1: pytest-cov 7.0.0
dropped subprocess measurement, so without that key every entry point scores 0% and nothing
warns. 7.13.1 is also the oldest coverage whose report crapkit reads; an older one fails the
lane at exit 5. docs/lanes.md has the whole rule.
1. Scaffold the config
$ crapkit init
wrote crapkit.toml with 1 scope(s): calc
detected 1 lane(s) from this repo's own files: py - next: run `crapkit coverage`
added to .gitignore: .crapkit/, .coverage, __pycache__/init sniffs tracked source into one scope per top-level source directory, and detects a
coverage lane from what the repo already has: a pytest marker file (pyproject.toml,
pytest.ini, setup.cfg) writes a live [[lane]], and so does a test script or
vitest/jest in package.json. A lockfile beside them names the environment: uv.lock,
poetry.lock, pdm.lock or Pipfile.lock makes the lane uv run python -m pytest … (and
the matching run for the rest), because a bare python binds to whichever venv the shell
has active rather than the one the repo pins; see
The interpreter a lane binds to. Whatever
it detects, it also leaves commented templates for the runners it did not find, and those
carry the same launcher, so uncommenting one cannot hand the bare python back. Every lane
it writes reports into .crapkit/cov/, which is why the .gitignore list is so short: see
Where artifacts live.
With no lockfile the lane names its interpreter with a launcher token, so one committed
line runs on every OS: {python} here, which crapkit reads as python on Windows and
python3 on Linux and macOS, or {python:.venv} when a .venv in the repo holds pytest.
The launcher token
lists each form.
init reads each package.json past a UTF-8 byte-order mark, as npm does. A root
package.json that is not one UTF-8 JSON object stops init at exit 3 before it writes any
file, naming the file and the fix, since a lane read off such a file would be a guess: one in
UTF-16 (what PowerShell 5.1's Out-File writes), one holding a byte that is not UTF-8, one
that does not parse and one that holds an array or another value, as in
init wrote no file: package.json is not UTF-8 (byte e9 at offset 36); save it as UTF-8. A
nested one, a test fixture say, is skipped with one warning line naming it.
init writes .gitignore before crapkit.toml, and appends in that file's own line ending
without touching a byte already there. It reads the lines past a UTF-8 byte-order mark, as git
does, so an entry already there is not added twice. A UTF-16 .gitignore, which git cannot
read either, is named on stderr with the fix and left as it was. Run init again over an existing
crapkit.toml and it adds the .gitignore entries its lanes need, says what it finished,
exits 0 and leaves crapkit.toml byte for byte. Over a UTF-16 .gitignore it exits 3 with
the line that names that file and the entries to add; with nothing missing it refuses with
already exists.
[crapkit]
target = 6
[[scope]]
name = "calc"
paths = ["calc"]
languages = ["python"]
[exclude]
# A leading **/ matches zero or more directories, so each glob below reaches the
# repo root and every nested copy. Test directories leave the corpus on their own.
globs = [
"**/node_modules/**",
"**/dist/**",
"**/build/**",
"**/vendor/**",
"**/generated/**",
"**/__generated__/**",
"**/*.generated.*",
"**/*.test.*",
"**/*.spec.*",
"**/test_*.py",
"**/*_test.py",
"**/conftest.py",
"**/*_test.go",
"**/*.config.ts",
"**/*.config.js",
"**/*.config.mts",
]
[[lane]]
name = "py"
command = "{python} -m pytest --cov --cov-branch --cov-report=json:.crapkit/cov/py.json --junitxml=.crapkit/cov/junit-py.xml --continue-on-collection-errors"
artifact = ".crapkit/cov/py.json"
results_artifact = ".crapkit/cov/junit-py.xml"
parser = "coveragepy"
scopes = ["calc"]
# Declare one [[lane]] per coverage command, then run `crapkit coverage`.
# [[lane]]
# name = "js"
# command = "npx vitest run --coverage --coverage.reportsDirectory=.crapkit/cov/js --coverage.reportOnFailure --reporter=default --reporter=junit --outputFile=.crapkit/cov/js/junit.xml"
# artifact = ".crapkit/cov/js/coverage-final.json"
# results_artifact = ".crapkit/cov/js/junit.xml"
# parser = "istanbul"
# scopes = ["<your-scope>"]
# `crapkit test-scoped FILES` runs one command per scope, with {files}
# replaced by that scope's files, each quoted; a template with no {files}
# runs as written, which is how a scope whose tests live elsewhere runs them.
[crapkit.scoped_tests]
# calc: no test file under calc/, so the whole suite runs, from tests/
calc = "{python} -m pytest tests -q -p no:cacheprovider"
The last block is the one an agent loop needs. crapkit test-scoped exits 3 for a file
whose scope declares no template, and AGENTS.md
makes it step 4 of the burn-down loop. Every key is in
docs/configuration.md.
2. Check the config against the repo
$ crapkit doctor
resources: up to 8 analysis worker(s) per pool, 8 shared slot(s); lane log limit 16777216 bytes per file
ok config keys all recognized
ok scope 'calc': 1 file
ok every tracked source file belongs to a scope
ok 1 lane(s) declared
ok lane 'py': python3 -> /home/you/.venvs/ledger/bin/python3 (pytest 8.3.3, pytest-cov 7.1.0, coverage 7.13.1)
ok lizard 1.24.0
doctor: no problems founddoctor prints one line per check and exits 1 only on a FAIL. WARN and note report
and exit 0, and the closing line counts the WARNs above it (doctor: no problems found, 1 warning above).
3. Score the repo, and read the queue
$ crapkit coverage
run 1 @ fae4db93108: 2 functions scored: 2 measured, 1 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 41.0, grade F
-> next: crapkit worklist
$ crapkit worklist
worklist @ fae4db93108 (run 1, floor ccn>=5, churn 12mo) - 1 of 1 active (worklist_top 50), 0 dormant
risk 14.0 ccn 14 crap 38.5 cov 50% 1c/1a calc/grade.py:7 classify( score , attempts , late , bonus )
no crapkit-ratchet.tsv yet: seed marks each function over its ceiling at today's score, and from then on a mark may only fall
-> next: crapkit ratchet seedColumns: risk, ccn, the function's crap and cov off the ranked run (both - on an
inventory-only run, and cov - on a no-lane or cc-only row, which no lane
measured), <commits>c/<authors>a in the churn window, path:line, the function's long
name, then a marker on rows the burn-down queue will not hand out (ok, no-lane). The
header counts the active rows against their total, so 50 of 3980 active (worklist_top 50)
says what the cap hid, and reads (--top N) when the flag set the cap.
--json also carries ccn_std, weight and ratchet_mark.
The last line names the step after this one. It is ratchet seed while the repo has no
marks file, next-item once it has one, and coverage when the ranked run cannot serve
as a baseline: an inventory run, a partial run or a failed verify. This walk looks at the
top item first, in step 4, and seeds in step 5.
worklist is the risk map, not a to-do list. It ranks finished rows too, so it does
not empty when the burn-down does. next-item is the other view of that run: it drops the
no-lane rows, ranks by crap, and its empty: true is the stop condition.
4. Take the top item
$ crapkit next-item
{"commands": {"refresh": "crapkit coverage --reuse-unchanged"}, "commit": "fae4db93108b4841a00959f9117430679e7250ca", "empty": false, "item": {"authors": 1, "ccn": 14, "ccn_std": 14, "cognitive": 13, "commits": 1, "cov": 0.5, "crap": 38.5, "end": 28, "est_splits": 3, "est_uncovered_paths": 7, "flag": "measured", "function": "classify( score , attempts , late , bonus )", "handle": "classify", "nesting": 3, "nloc": 22, "occurrence": 1, "path": "calc/grade.py", "remedy": "decompose", "scope": "calc", "start": 7, "target": 6, "uncovered_lines": [9, 11, 15, 17, 19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28], "unmeasured": false}, "run_id": 1, "schema": 1, "scored_changes": 0, "shallow": false, "skipped_no_lane": 0, "stale": false}remedy: "decompose", est_splits: 3 (this needs roughly three pieces to fit under 6),
and uncovered_lines naming the ten lines no test walks. handle is the name form to
pass back. scored_changes: 0 says no file the run scored holds other content now, so
these numbers describe the files on disk; anything but 0, null included, means run
commands.refresh before acting on them. stale: false says HEAD is still the run's
commit, a question about the commit and not the files. Every field is in
docs/agent-json.md.
5. Seed the ratchet
Arm the debt gate before fixing anything. ratchet seed records every over-target
function at its current score, and from then on nothing may get worse.
$ crapkit ratchet seed
crapkit-ratchet.tsv: added 1, tightened 0 - 1 mark(s) vs run 1 (fae4db93108)
-> next: commit crapkit-ratchet.tsv, then run `crapkit verify`
$ git add crapkit.toml crapkit-ratchet.tsv .gitignore && git commit -m "adopt crapkit"A verify here would pass and give the repo its first passing verdict. This walk runs it
in step 6, after the fix.
6. Fix it and verify
Extract until every piece sits at or under the ceiling. Here classify became
_validate, _adjusted, _band and a classify that only sequences them, with the
table of cases pushed into parametrized tests. Commit the fix, then:
$ crapkit verify
verify OK @ 8d10c13303d vs baseline fae4db93108 (5 changed files) ratchet: 1 dropped, 0 tightened -> git add crapkit-ratchet.tsv
changed files: calc/grade.py, .gitignore, crapkit-ratchet.tsv and 2 more
$ crapkit coverage
run 3 @ 8d10c13303d: 5 functions scored: 5 measured, 0 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 19.0, grade A+
-> next: crapkit worklistCRAP load 41.0 to 19.0, grade F to A+. verify reruns the lanes and checks three things
against the trusted baseline: every function the diff touched sits at or under its
ceiling, no marked function got worse, and no test that passed in the baseline fails now.
Exit 0 advances the baseline and tightens crapkit-ratchet.tsv in place, so the repaid
mark leaves the file: follow up with git commit -am "ratchet: classify repaid". The full
mark lifecycle is in docs/ratchet.md.
crapkit next-item now comes back empty: true with a reasons object saying which
ending you got. That is most of the stop condition, not all of it:
AGENTS.md states the whole rule and reads the rest of
reasons.
Quickstart: TypeScript
A vitest repo with src/grade.ts and test/grade.test.ts.
1. Scaffold the config
$ crapkit init
wrote crapkit.toml with 1 scope(s): src
detected 1 lane(s) from this repo's own files: js - next: run `crapkit coverage`
added to .gitignore: .crapkit/The lane init wrote is
npm run test -- --coverage --coverage.reportsDirectory=.crapkit/cov/js --coverage.reportOnFailure --reporter=default --reporter=junit --outputFile=.crapkit/cov/js/junit.xml.
It reads vitest's json reporter from .crapkit/cov/js/coverage-final.json; the
reportsDirectory flag is what keeps that report out of your root. The junit half is the
lane's results_artifact, which the crashed-worker and no-new-failures checks read; both
reporters are named because --reporter=junit alone would replace the console output you
watch the suite through. Anything that produces
an istanbul coverage-final.json works; see docs/lanes.md for the
jest and pytest recipes, a package
one directory down, and a
crapkit root below the repo top.
init writes the vitest line under [crapkit.scoped_tests] commented out, because it
cannot see which vitest config a file-scoped run needs. Until you uncomment that line or
write your own, crapkit doctor WARNs scope 'src' has a lane but no [crapkit.scoped_tests] template. The WARN leaves doctor's exit at 0; it means crapkit test-scoped exits 3 on files under src/.
2. Install a coverage provider
This is the step that stops most TypeScript users. vitest ships no coverage provider
by default. Without one, init and doctor are both happy and coverage dies with
exit 5:
$ crapkit coverage
crapkit: lane 'js' FAILED: lane 'js' produced no artifact at .crapkit/cov/js/coverage-final.json (command exit 1); lane log: /repo/.crapkit/lane-js.log; last output: $ npm run test -- --coverage --coverage.reportsDirectory=.crapkit/cov/js --coverage.reportOnFailure --reporter=default --reporter=junit --outputFile=.crapkit/cov/js/junit.xml
> app@1.0.0 test
> vitest run --coverage --coverage.reportsDirectory=.crapkit/cov/js --coverage.reportOnFailure --reporter=default --reporter=junit --outputFile=.crapkit/cov/js/junit.xml
MISSING DEPENDENCY Cannot find dependency '@vitest/coverage-v8'
(exit 1)
crapkit: every lane failed (1 of 1); the errors are aboveThe two > lines are npm's banner: > <name>@<version> test from your package.json (> test
when it has no name or version), then the command the test script runs.
That failure writes no run. Every lane failed, so coverage exits before it opens a
store: there is no .crapkit/crap.sqlite yet and the run ids below still start at 1.
Install the provider, and pin the major yourself. Unpinned, npm resolves the newest provider against your older vitest and refuses the tree:
npm i -D "@vitest/coverage-v8@<your vitest major>"Question | Answer |
Which provider? | Either works. |
Which crapkit parser? | Both feed |
Which version? | The provider's major has to match vitest's. Read your vitest major with |
The artifact crapkit wants is coverage-final.json, written by vitest's json coverage
reporter, which is on by default. If your vitest config sets coverage.reporter
explicitly, keep "json" in the list.
vitest writes no coverage report at all when the run fails. The lane init wrote
already carries --coverage.reportOnFailure, so a red test still produces the artifact.
If you write the lane by hand, or you would rather keep the switch beside your other
coverage settings, coverage.reportOnFailure = true in the vitest config does the same
job; either one is enough. The full block is in
docs/lanes.md.
3. Score the repo
$ crapkit coverage
run 1 @ 8bfbe613fcd: 2 functions scored: 2 measured, 1 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 56.68, grade F
-> next: crapkit worklist
$ crapkit worklist
worklist @ 8bfbe613fcd (run 1, floor ccn>=5, churn 12mo) - 1 of 1 active (worklist_top 50), 0 dormant
risk 15.0 ccn 15 crap 52.4 cov 45% 1c/1a src/grade.ts:8 classify ( row Row )
no crapkit-ratchet.tsv yet: seed marks each function over its ceiling at today's score, and from then on a mark may only fall
-> next: crapkit ratchet seedclassify is ccn 15 against a ceiling of 6: one function holding the late-and-retry
penalty, the letter bands, the demotion rule and the null case.
4. Seed the ratchet and commit
ratchet seed records every over-target function at the score it has today, so nothing
can get worse while you burn this one down.
$ crapkit ratchet seed
crapkit-ratchet.tsv: added 1, tightened 0 - 1 mark(s) vs run 1 (8bfbe613fcd)
-> next: commit crapkit-ratchet.tsv, then run `crapkit verify`
$ git add crapkit.toml crapkit-ratchet.tsv .gitignore && git commit -m "adopt crapkit"5. Fix it
Above the ceiling, coverage cannot help, so classify gets split rather than tested.
penalty, band and demote come out as their own exported functions, and classify
keeps the null case and the bonus:
export function classify(row: Row): string {
if (row.score === null) {
return "N/A";
}
let score = row.score - penalty(row.attempts, row.late);
if (row.bonus && score < 90) {
score += 3;
}
return demote(band(score), row);
}rescore --gate judges that edit on complexity alone, before the slow step:
$ crapkit rescore src/grade.ts --gate
rescore vs run 1 @ 8bfbe613fcd (coverage STALE, complexity fresh)
ccn cov crap remedy function
5 - 30.0 add-tests src/grade.ts:22 band ( score ) (coverage not measured)
5 - 30.0 add-tests src/grade.ts:38 demote ( letter , row Row ) (coverage not measured)
4 - 20.0 add-tests src/grade.ts:8 penalty ( attempts , late ) (coverage not measured)
4 45% 6.7 add-tests src/grade.ts:48 classify ( row Row )
4 75% 4.2 ok src/grade.ts:59 average ( scores Array )
gate: 4 changed function(s) judged, 0 over ceiling 6Exit 0 and the gate: line: every changed piece is at or under 6. The crap column is loud because its coverage half
is still run 1's, from before three of those functions existed. Run 1 has no row for
band, demote or penalty, so each prints - for cov, ends (coverage not measured) and scores as if no test ran it. add-tests is the literal instruction for
step 6.
6. Cover the new pieces
rescore --gate passed on complexity, not on coverage. penalty, band and demote are
three functions no test has ever called, so each gets a table test:
describe("band", () => {
it.each([[95, "A"], [85, "B"], [75, "C"], [65, "D"], [10, "F"]])(
"scores %i as %s", (score, expected) => expect(band(score)).toBe(expected));
});Run the suite once before the slow step:
$ npx vitest run
Test Files 1 passed (1)
Tests 21 passed (21)Skip this step and step 7 fails rather than passes. Run on a copy of this repo with steps
1 to 5 as written, step 5 left uncommitted and step 6 left out, verify reruns the lanes
against the real tree and three functions the old suite never called come back over the
ceiling. Each GATE line ends [dirty] because the edit is not committed, and the last line
counts the findings that way. The block leaves out the two warnings verify prints above its
verdict, one for changed lines no test covers and one for debt no mark signs:
$ crapkit verify
verify FAILED @ 0296156ff21 vs baseline 8bfbe613fcd (6 changed files)
changed files: src/grade.ts, .gitignore, crapkit-ratchet.tsv and 3 more
GATE crap 17.8 ccn 5 cov 20% src/grade.ts:38 demote ( letter , row Row ) -> add-tests [dirty]
GATE crap 12.4 ccn 5 cov 33% src/grade.ts:22 band ( score ) -> add-tests [dirty]
GATE crap 10.8 ccn 4 cov 25% src/grade.ts:8 penalty ( attempts , late ) -> add-tests [dirty]
findings: 0 committed / 3 dirty (uncommitted edits and untracked files)7. Verify
$ crapkit verify
verify OK @ 2af3433d979 vs baseline 8bfbe613fcd (7 changed files) ratchet: 1 dropped, 0 tightened -> git add crapkit-ratchet.tsv
changed files: src/grade.ts, .gitignore, crapkit-ratchet.tsv and 4 more
$ crapkit coverage
run 3 @ 2af3433d979: 5 functions scored: 5 measured, 0 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 22.0, grade A+
-> next: crapkit worklistCRAP load 56.68 to 22.0, grade F to A+, and the mark seeded in step 4 is gone: verify
dropped it once classify scored under the ceiling, rewriting the tracked
crapkit-ratchet.tsv in place. Commit it with your change. Marks only ever fall.
The seven changed files are everything since run 1's commit: the three files step 4
committed, the package.json and package-lock.json that step 2's install changed, and
the two files steps 5 and 6 edited.
A verify may also print warning: N changed line(s) have no coverage above its verdict;
that block is advisory unless diff_uncovered_max is set
(docs/configuration.md).
It prints warning: N function(s) over the ceiling carry no ratchet mark and names the
first three when the tree holds debt ratchet seed never signed: the gate judges touched functions only and the
ratchet check compares marks only, so coverage loss on such a function would pass unseen.
The count is unmarked_over_target in --json, fires no exit code, and is zero on a repo
with no debt.
Documentation
Page | Covers |
Start here for anything deeper. The illustrated handbook: what crapkit is, how every piece works, and where each command earns its keep. The same page ships in the repository as | |
The judgment layer over the quickstarts: scope granularity, exclude vs lane, scoped_tests wiring, the first-verify taint hazard. | |
Every | |
The lane model, vitest and jest and pytest recipes, artifact reuse, flake retest, containers. | |
Worker budgets, command cleanup, log rotation and safe cleanup. | |
Seeding, pruning, the git merge driver, metric stamps, debt policy, overrides. | |
Existing installations: analysis and key versions, saved state, plugin alignment and Windows upgrades. | |
Lossless exports, portable baselines and ratchets, including filenames with delimiters. | |
What | |
The machine surface: | |
Wiring crapkit into 27 agents: each one's MCP config, whether it runs the advisory hook, and how it restarts after an upgrade. | |
Where crapkit sits next to radon, xenon, wily, coverage.py and SonarQube, and how they run together. | |
How crapkit checks its own numbers: each calculation against outside tools, hand tables and models, the tiers that run the checks, and every place crapkit reads a construct differently from an oracle on purpose. | |
The burn-down loop an agent runs, and the rules for changing crapkit itself. | |
What each release changed and how to upgrade to it. | |
Three skills and the MCP server for Claude Code and Codex, and the advisory PostToolUse hook that Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot CLI and VS Code run. |
crapkit.schema.json is the authority on the config file shape.
Development
pip install -e ".[dev,accuracy-push]"
git config core.hooksPath git-hooks
git config merge.crapkit-ratchet.driver "python -m crapkit ratchet merge %O %A %B"
python tools/testing/run.pyThe dev extra includes pytest, pytest-cov, pytest-xdist and coverage.py; the
accuracy-push extra holds the pinned oracles of the
calculation-accuracy suite.
The shared runner owns the unit and E2E schedule; use --unit-workers 1 for serial unit
reproduction or --coverage for combined branch coverage and JUnit. The
core.hooksPath line arms the complexity gate on commits and change control on pushes,
and the merge.crapkit-ratchet.driver line merges crapkit-ratchet.tsv through
crapkit ratchet merge instead of as text. See
CONTRIBUTING.md
for development, docs/accuracy.md
for how crapkit checks its own numbers, and
tools/deploy/README.md
for the install tests each release passes.
Maintainer and project background
crapkit is created and maintained by Jean-François Gagné. Read the project background for the problem it addresses and how it fits into his work on software and AI.
License
MIT. See LICENSE.
Available Tools
12 toolscheck_configConfig and repo health checkARead-onlyIdempotent
Checks that crapkit.toml agrees with the repo: typo keys, empty scopes, missing lane cwds, runners that fail to start. Run it first when any tool answers strangely or the ranking misses a file, and list_runs when only the history is in question. It needs no run, probes each runner once per lane directory and environment, runs no lane, and any problem arrives with isError true. repo can be any directory under the checkout, and one with no crapkit.toml above it answers a pointer, never a parent's config.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| lanes | No | per declared lane |
| store | No | the run store |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| problems | No | FAIL findings as sentences naming the fix; non-empty is exit 1 and the result carries isError true |
| versions | No | the tools behind every number |
| warnings | No | WARN findings: unmeasured directories, scopes with a lane but no scoped_tests template, artifacts written outside .crapkit, lanes without results_artifact; exit stays 0 |
| resources | No | effective resource policy; limits and estimates, not sampled utilization |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
| newest_run | No | the newest run, or null when nothing has run |
| analysis_version | No | the analysis semantics version; with the lizard version it stamps every ratchet mark, so a bump refuses old marks until the repo re-seeds |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive), but the description adds behavior they cannot: no run is required, each runner is probed once per lane directory and environment, no lane is executed, and failures surface as isError true. That is real operational context an agent needs to interpret output.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Front-loaded with the purpose, then usage, then behavioral specifics; every sentence carries information. The third clause chains several facts together ('probes each runner once per lane directory and environment, runs no lane') which slightly hurts scannability but wastes no words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return-value detail is not required, yet the description still flags the isError signal and the no-config pointer case. For a single-optional-param diagnostic tool, nothing an agent needs to invoke or interpret it is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the single param is documented there, so the baseline is 3. The description goes beyond it by explaining resolution semantics: repo may be any directory under the checkout, and a path with no crapkit.toml above it returns a pointer rather than inheriting a parent's config.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Names a specific verb+resource ('Checks that crapkit.toml agrees with the repo') and enumerates the concrete failure classes it detects: typo keys, empty scopes, missing lane cwds, runners that fail to start. An agent can tell this apart from list_runs, get_trend, check_gate, etc. without opening any schema.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
'Run it first when any tool answers strangely or the ranking misses a file' gives an explicit trigger condition, and 'list_runs when only the history is in question' names the sibling and the condition that selects it. When-to-use and the alternative are both stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
check_gaterescore --gate verdict for an edited fileARead-onlyIdempotent
Checks an edited file by rescore --gate's rule: each changed function's ccn against its scope's ceiling, pardoned only while its crap is at or under its ratchet mark. The hook's commit gate pardons any marked function, so this is stricter and a breach predicts a verify refusal. Call it after an edit once get_function_brief states the rule. It runs no tests, and a breach reads gate.ok false, not an error. Marks are read only on a breach, so a clean gate skips a broken marks file. A tracked file is judged on its diff from HEAD, an untracked one in full.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | repo-relative, or absolute inside repo, source file to judge as edited. Outside the repo, missing or a directory answers a config error, and an unchanged or unscoped file judges 0. A file a scope takes whose name is not UTF-8 answers gate.ok false with the name in gate.unread_files. repo may be any directory under the checkout, and path stays relative to the root it walks up to. | |
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| gate | No | the verdict block |
| note | No | fixed reminder that coverage is the baseline run's and complexity the working tree's; crapkit verify gives the real verdict |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| functions | No | every function in the file, rescored |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
| baseline_run | No | id of the run whose coverage was reused |
| baseline_commit | No | that run's commit, full sha |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, yet the description adds substantial behavioural context: it runs no tests, a breach returns gate.ok false rather than an error, marks are only read on a breach (so a clean gate tolerates a broken marks file), and tracked files are judged on their diff from HEAD while untracked files are judged in full. That is exactly the kind of non-obvious behaviour annotations cannot convey.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The governing rule and judging semantics are front-loaded, and every sentence carries information the agent cannot get from schema or annotations. Style is dense and jargon-heavy (ccn, crap, ratchet mark), which costs a little readability but not correctness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a non-trivial static-analysis gate with an output schema present, the description covers the rule, the trigger, the failure signal (gate.ok false), diff-vs-full-file judging, and known edge cases. Return-value shape is rightly left to the output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, and both parameters carry rich in-schema documentation (path semantics, edge cases, unread_files, repo default). The description itself adds no parameter-level detail, so this is the baseline 3 where the schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The first sentence gives a precise verb and resource (checks an edited file) plus the exact rule it applies: changed-function ccn vs. scope ceiling, pardoned only while crap is under the ratchet mark. It also contrasts this with the hook's commit gate. It does not name or contrast any actual sibling tool (e.g., get_ratchet_report), so sibling differentiation is implied rather than stated.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
"Call it after an edit once get_function_brief states the rule" gives an explicit trigger and a named prerequisite. It further characterises the alternative (the hook's commit gate is laxer, so a breach here predicts a verify refusal), telling the agent when this tool is the right choice.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_function_briefStart-editing packet for one functionARead-onlyIdempotent
Returns one function's start-editing packet from the newest trusted run: scored row, uncovered lines and the refresh, test, gate and verify command lines, none of them run. Use it once a function is chosen. Skip it for picking what to fix, that is get_next_item, and for a score across runs, get_function_history. Twins come from the run's stored index, whose first build takes seconds. name must live in path. A miss is a tool error (isError true, the exit-1 error object) whose message lists the file's functions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | the long_name get_next_item printed (classify( score , late )), the bare identifier (classify, or route for a Rust `route cmd : & Cmd`), a fragment of either, the line the function starts on, or a handle such as NAME#2 for a twin or (anonymous)#2; exact match first | |
| path | Yes | source file, repo-relative or absolute inside the repo; a backslash separates folders on Windows only | |
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| lane | No | the lane whose artifact produced cov and uncovered_lines, verbatim from the config; null when no lane covers the scope |
| path | No | the resolved file, repo-relative |
| churn | No | the file's churn, or null when it had no commits in the window |
| notes | No | prose the config carries for whoever edits here |
| stale | No | true when the run's commit is not HEAD. It judges the commit, not the files: an amend or a commit that touched no scored file sets it, and an uncommitted edit leaves it false; scored_changes counts the files whose content moved. Schema 2 redefines it as that content difference |
| commit | No | that run's commit, full sha |
| handle | No | short name form: the bare identifier or (anonymous)#N, the same value get_next_item prints |
| params | No | parameters in declaration order, so a test can call the function without opening the file |
| remedy | No | decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok: the branch the session takes; scored.remedy carries the same value |
| run_id | No | id of the run these numbers come from: the newest trusted run (a coverage run, or a verify run whose verdict passed) |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| scored | No | the whole scored row from the run |
| source | No | the function's own text, start to end inclusive, newlines intact: editable without reading the file |
| target | No | this scope's effective ceiling: the highest CRAP a function may carry, and so also the highest ccn; the same value as gate_rule.ceiling |
| shallow | No | true when this checkout is a shallow clone: churn and gate_rule.mark_age_days count only the commits the clone holds; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallow for the real counts |
| attempts | No | every claim ever taken on this function, oldest first; [] on a first attempt, and a row with closed null is a claim still open |
| commands | No | the rest of the loop as whole command lines for this file and scope; run them as given |
| coupling | No | up to 5 change-coupling partners at support 5 and confidence 0.5, strongest first; empty when none qualify; list_coupled_files has the repo-wide list |
| function | No | the resolved lizard long name, whichever name form was asked with |
| regrowth | No | did this get fixed before |
| versions | No | what produced these numbers |
| gate_rule | No | what check_gate will judge this edit by |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
| est_splits | No | 0 when ccn <= target, else ceil(ccn / target) |
| unmeasured | No | true when no measurement stands behind cov: flag no-lane (no lane covers the scope) or cc-only (the scope asks for no coverage). cov 0.0 and est_uncovered_paths are then stand-ins, not a count of paths no test walks |
| file_totals | No | the file rolled up |
| ratchet_mark | No | the committed ratchet mark, or null when the function carries none or the repo has no ratchet file |
| file_functions | No | every scored function in the same file: where an extracted helper lands, and which names are taken |
| scored_changes | No | how many files the run scored hold other content now than the run recorded, deleted files included; 0 means the numbers describe the files on disk; null when crapkit cannot compare: the run recorded no content (crapkit 0.8.0 or older wrote it) or git failed reading the tree; treat null like any count above 0 and run commands.refresh |
| uncovered_lines | No | line numbers no test ran; [] when the span is fully covered; null when no artifact could answer, then uncovered_lines_note says why |
| duplication_twins | No | up to 10 near-duplicate functions at similarity 0.8, best first; empty is normal; list_duplicate_functions has the repo-wide pairs |
| est_uncovered_paths | No | (1 - cov) x ccn rounded half to even, so 2.5 reads 2 |
| uncovered_lines_note | No | present only when uncovered_lines is null: the reason and the move (stale artifact, no test imports the file, coverage_optional scope) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive), but the description adds behavior beyond them: the returned command lines are 'none of them run', twin handles come from a stored index whose 'first build takes seconds' (a latency hint), and the failure mode is spelled out ('isError true, the exit-1 error object') with a message that lists the file's functions. This is unusually rich disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Dense but front-loaded: the first sentence defines the payload, the second routes usage, the remainder covers constraints and failure. Every sentence earns its place, though the run-on phrasing about the stored index is slightly cryptic.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a read-only lookup with an output schema and full param coverage, the description supplies everything else an agent needs: selection guidance, the name/path coupling, non-execution of the returned commands, and precise error semantics.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and both required params are fully documented there, which sets baseline 3. The description adds a relational constraint the schema does not state — 'name must live in path' — giving genuine meaning beyond the structured fields.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Returns one function's start-editing packet from the newest trusted run') and enumerates the packet contents, so the agent knows exactly what comes back. It also names the sibling tools it is not, making it distinguishable without opening other schemas.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicit triggering condition ('Use it once a function is chosen') plus two named exclusions with their alternatives: get_next_item for picking what to fix, get_function_history for scores across runs. Nothing is left to inference.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_function_historyOne function's score across runsARead-onlyIdempotent
Returns one function's ccn, coverage, crap and flag per run, oldest first, plus its ratchet mark. Use it to tell improving from decaying or regrown, and get_function_brief to start an edit. history true spawns git log -L capped at 10 commits, and tests true is null unless the lane recorded contexts. name matches the long names any run scored in path, so a fragment returns one entry per match, and a bare twin name picks the worst twin. A same-line twin's history skips runs stored before same-line positions. repo may be any directory under the checkout.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | the long_name get_next_item printed (classify( score , late )), the bare identifier (classify, or route for a Rust `route cmd : & Cmd`), a fragment of either, the line the function starts on, or a handle such as NAME#2 for a twin or (anonymous)#2; exact match first | |
| path | Yes | source file, repo-relative or absolute inside the repo; a backslash separates folders on Windows only | |
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory | |
| tests | No | also list the tests covering this function (coverage.py contexts), as tests | |
| history | No | also list the commits that touched this function (git log -L), as commits |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| name | No | the name argument as given |
| path | No | the file asked about |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| functions | No | the functions name resolved to, in store order |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations only cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive). The description adds substantial behavior beyond them: history caps git log -L at 10 commits, tests is null unless the lane recorded contexts, same-line twins skip runs stored before same-line positions. These are exactly the runtime quirks an agent needs to interpret results.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Front-loaded with the return content and the routing decision, then dense caveats. Every sentence carries information, though the middle section is tightly packed and reads as a run-on chain of edge cases.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Output schema exists so return values need not be explained, yet the description still names the returned metrics and ordering ('oldest first'). For a 5-param tool with twin-matching complexity, the behavioral coverage is strong; only explicit prerequisites or error behavior are absent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds meaning beyond the schema: name fragments return one entry per match, a bare twin name picks the worst twin, and repo may be any directory under the checkout. This is genuine cross-parameter behavior the schema fields do not spell out.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Returns one function's ccn, coverage, crap and flag per run') and names the exact differentiator versus the sibling get_function_brief ('get_function_brief to start an edit'). An agent can distinguish this from get_function_brief and get_trend without opening either schema.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Gives explicit when-to-use ('Use it to tell improving from decaying or regrown') and routes to the alternative for the adjacent task ('get_function_brief to start an edit'). No explicit when-not or prerequisites section, so it stops short of a 5.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_next_itemNext function to fixARead-onlyIdempotent
Returns the next function to fix as a work packet, the newest trusted run's worst row by crap. Use it to start a fix, list_worklist to survey the same run by risk, and get_function_brief once a function is chosen. It runs no tests, and empty true means the queue is spent, not the work, so read reasons. Filters cut before top counts: top 3 with exclude ["tests/"] returns the three worst rows outside tests, and an unknown scope name is a config error.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| top | No | return the next N packets as items instead of one item (N >= 1, default 1) | |
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory | |
| scope | No | restrict the ranking to these declared scopes (exact [[scope]] names from crapkit.toml, one --scope each) | |
| exclude | No | skip rows whose path or long function name contains any of these fragments (one --exclude each) |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| item | No | the one packet, present when empty is false and top is absent or 1 |
| empty | No | true when the queue has nothing to hand out; then reasons is present and item and items are absent |
| items | No | up to top packets in crap-descending order, present when empty is false and top is above 1 |
| stale | No | true when the run's commit is not HEAD. It judges the commit, not the files: an amend or a commit that touched no scored file sets it, and an uncommitted edit leaves it false; scored_changes counts the files whose content moved. Schema 2 redefines it as that content difference |
| commit | No | that run's commit, full sha |
| run_id | No | id of the run these numbers come from: the newest trusted run (a coverage run, or a verify run whose verdict passed) |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| reasons | No | why the queue is empty, present only when empty is true; the stop condition is empty true with skipped_claimed and no_lane_over_target both 0 or absent and scored_changes 0 |
| shallow | No | true when this checkout is a shallow clone: commits, authors and the churn the ranking reads count only the commits the clone holds; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallow for the real counts |
| commands | No | the call that answers stale and scored_changes; run it as given |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
| scored_changes | No | how many files the run scored hold other content now than the run recorded, deleted files included; 0 means the numbers describe the files on disk; null when crapkit cannot compare: the run recorded no content (crapkit 0.8.0 or older wrote it) or git failed reading the tree; treat null like any count above 0 and run commands.refresh |
| skipped_claimed | No | rows another session's claim hid; present only when non-zero, and list_claims names the holders |
| skipped_no_lane | No | rows above the floor that no lane measures, kept out of the ranking because their cov 0 is a tooling gap, not a testing gap |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive), but the description adds genuinely new behavior: it runs no tests, an empty result has a specific interpreted meaning, filters apply before the top-N cut, and an unknown scope name is a config error rather than an empty result. These are non-obvious traits not derivable from annotations or schema.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Front-loads the purpose and selection rule in the first sentence, then packs routing, caveats, and filter semantics into the remainder. Every clause carries information, though the later sentences are dense and read as a run-on, which costs some scannability.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With an output schema present, return values need no explanation, and the description still interprets the meaningful cases ('empty true', work packets as items). Combined with annotations covering safety and 100% schema coverage, an agent has everything needed to call this correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so each parameter is documented, making 3 the baseline. The description goes beyond it by explaining the interaction between parameters ('Filters cut before top counts: top 3 with exclude ["tests/"] returns the three worst rows outside tests'), which clarifies ordering semantics the schema does not state.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Returns the next function to fix as a work packet') and pins down the selection rule ('newest trusted run's worst row by crap'). It explicitly distinguishes itself from siblings list_worklist and get_function_brief, so an agent can route without opening any schema.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Gives explicit when-to-use: 'Use it to start a fix', with named alternatives for adjacent intents ('list_worklist to survey the same run by risk', 'get_function_brief once a function is chosen'). It also flags the empty-queue case ('empty true means the queue is spent, not the work, so read reasons') and the unknown-scope failure mode.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_ratchet_reportRatchet debt burn-downARead-onlyIdempotent
Reports the ratchet debt burn-down: open marks with their age, repayments and policy findings. Use it to judge whether marked debt is repaid or piling up, and get_function_history for one function's mark. It reads the marks file and its git history only, and ages count from the newest commit touching that file, never the clock. Open marks are the file's rows, committed or not. A deleted or emptied file reports the marks its history last held as open, none repaid, and no file with no history reports zeros. repo may be any directory under the checkout.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| open | No | marks open on disk, working tree included: an uncommitted seed counts |
| oldest | No | up to 20 open marks, oldest first |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| shallow | No | true when this checkout is a shallow clone: ages and repayments count only the commits the clone holds; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallow for the real counts, and crapkit ratchet report --enforce refuses to judge the debt policy there (exit 4) |
| anchor_ts | No | unix seconds of the newest commit that touched the ratchet file; every age and window counts back from here, never from the wall clock; 0 with no ratchet history |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
| uncommitted | No | marks the working tree and the newest committed ratchet file disagree on: added, repaid or tightened but not committed |
| dropped_total | No | marks repaid over the whole committed history |
| dropped_last_30d | No | marks repaid in the 30 days before anchor_ts |
| dropped_last_90d | No | marks repaid in the 90 days before anchor_ts |
| policy_violations | No | null when no debt policy is configured, [] when the policy ran clean, else the findings as sentences |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, yet the description goes further with non-obvious behavior: ages derive from the newest commit touching the marks file rather than the clock, the file plus its git history are the only inputs, and deleted/emptied/no-history files have defined outputs (last-held marks as open, or zeros). These edge cases materially change how an agent interprets results.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Front-loaded with purpose, then behavior, then the parameter note; every sentence carries information. The prose is telegraphic in places ('it reads the marks file and its git history only'), which costs a little readability but not content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return-format detail is unnecessary, and the description instead covers exactly what structured fields do not: age semantics, deletion/empty/no-history edge cases, and single-param scoping. Complete for a read-only report tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds real semantics for repo ('may be any directory under the checkout'). That clarification sits in slight tension with the schema's 'root of the scored repo', which is the only reason it is not a 5.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Reports the ratchet debt burn-down') and enumerates the payload: open marks with age, repayments, policy findings. It explicitly names the sibling it is not, get_function_history, so an agent can separate the aggregate view from the single-function view without opening either schema.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides a decision rule ('Use it to judge whether marked debt is repaid or piling up') and routes the adjacent case to get_function_history for one function's mark. Nothing about when to reach for this tool versus its siblings is left to inference.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_trendDebt trend per runARead-onlyIdempotent
Returns per-run totals for every trusted run, oldest first, with a grade per scope. Use it for the whole repo's trajectory. Use get_function_history for one function and get_ratchet_report for marked debt. It runs no lane and spawns no git. The first call on a large store sums every run into a rollup cache and takes seconds. Later calls read the cache back. repo may be any directory under a checkout where crapkit init and crapkit coverage have run. One with no snapshot store yet answers isError true with the setup pointer.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| runs | No | one row per trusted run, oldest first |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| target | No | the [crapkit] target: the default ceiling, the highest CRAP a function may carry, and so also the highest ccn, that every scope inherits unless it sets its own |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the safety and idempotency profile is fully covered by structured data. What the description adds beyond that is operationally useful but partly redundant framing: 'runs no lane and spawns no git' echoes the no-side-effect annotations, while the first-call rollup caching cost (seconds on a large store) and the isError-with-setup-pointer failure mode are real, non-duplicated behavioral disclosures. Net, it adds modest context over the annotations rather than a rich set of new traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Front-loads the return shape, then alternatives, then behavior and preconditions; each sentence carries information. It is denser and longer than strictly minimal — the 'runs no lane and spawns no git' clause restates annotation-level safety — but there is no padding for padding's sake.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Return values need not be documented since an output schema exists, and the description already covers ordering, granularity, prime cost, cache reuse and the empty-store error path. Nothing an agent needs to call this correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Only one parameter and schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline would be 3. The description lifts it by explaining that repo may be any directory under a checkout where init and coverage have already run, which clarifies accepted values beyond the schema's plain path/default description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb+resource+scope: per-run totals for every trusted run, oldest first, with a grade per scope. It explicitly distinguishes itself from siblings get_function_history (one function) and get_ratchet_report (marked debt), so an agent can route without opening any other schema.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Gives explicit when-to-use ('the whole repo's trajectory') and names the two alternatives with their selecting conditions. It also states the repo precondition (any directory under a checkout where crapkit init and crapkit coverage ran), which is genuine usage guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_claimsOpen queue claimsARead-onlyIdempotent
Lists open claims on queue items, oldest first. Use it when get_next_item answers empty or skipped_claimed above 0, and use get_function_brief to see one function's own attempts. No tool here writes a claim: the CLI releases a stale one with crapkit claims release PATH NAME, and verify closes one at the ceiling. repo may be any directory under the checkout, since the server walks up to the nearest crapkit.toml. No crapkit.toml above it answers an init pointer, and one with no snapshot store yet a coverage pointer, both as isError true.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| open | No | number of open claims |
| claims | No | open claims, oldest first |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already cover readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, and the description adds genuinely new behavior: the CLI-only claim release path, repo path walk-up semantics, and the two distinct isError conditions (init pointer vs coverage pointer). The 'no tool here writes a claim' line partly restates readOnlyHint, but the error and release context is real added value.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Purpose is front-loaded and every sentence carries information, but several concerns (usage, CLI release, path resolution, error cases) are packed into one dense paragraph. It is economical, if a little hard to parse on first read.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return values need no explanation, and the description still covers usage, mutation model, path resolution, and failure modes. Nothing an agent needs to invoke it correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3, but the description adds meaning the schema lacks: repo may be any directory under the checkout because the server walks up to the nearest crapkit.toml, which clarifies the accepted argument shape beyond 'path to the scored repo's root'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The first sentence states a specific verb (Lists), resource (open claims on queue items), and ordering (oldest first). It is immediately distinguishable from siblings like get_next_item and get_function_brief, which are named explicitly.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It gives an explicit trigger condition ('when get_next_item answers empty or skipped_claimed above 0') and routes to the alternative ('use get_function_brief to see one function's own attempts'). When-to-use and the relevant sibling are both spelled out.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_coupled_filesFiles that change togetherARead-onlyIdempotent
Lists file pairs that keep landing in the same commits over the churn window, strongest first, at most 50. Use it before editing a file to learn what an edit drags along, and list_duplicate_functions for copied code. It reads a cached ranking, not the scored run, and walks git log again only when HEAD, the churn window or the clone depth moved. An empty list means no pair cleared both thresholds, not a missing run: min_support 5 needs five shared commits, and min_confidence 0.5 means the rarer file moved with its partner half the time.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory | |
| min_support | No | minimum shared commits before a pair counts (default 5) | |
| min_confidence | No | minimum P(pair changes together), 0 to 1 (default 0.5) |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| pairs | No | pairs clearing both thresholds, ordered by support x confidence descending, at most 50 |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
| window_months | No | months of git history the pairs were counted over, back from the commit date of HEAD (the config's churn_window_months) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare it read-only, idempotent and non-destructive, but the description adds real behavior beyond them: it reads a cached ranking rather than the scored run, re-walks git log only when HEAD, the churn window or clone depth moved, and defines what an empty list means. This staleness/invalidation contract is exactly the kind of context annotations cannot express.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Front-loaded with purpose, then usage, then caching and threshold caveats; every sentence earns its place. It is dense and the last sentence packs multiple clauses, but nothing is redundant.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return-value details are not needed. The description covers the caching model, the invalidation triggers, the result cap and ordering, and the empty-result interpretation, leaving no material gap for correct invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description goes further by interpreting the parameters: min_support 5 means five shared commits and min_confidence 0.5 means the rarer file moved with its partner half the time. That gives intuitive meaning to both numeric thresholds beyond the schema's terse text.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Lists file pairs that keep landing in the same commits'), plus scope (churn window), ordering (strongest first) and cap (at most 50). It explicitly distinguishes itself from list_duplicate_functions, so an agent can separate the two without opening either schema.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Gives an explicit trigger ('use it before editing a file to learn what an edit drags along') and names the alternative tool plus the condition selecting it ('list_duplicate_functions for copied code'). It also pre-explains the empty-result case so the agent doesn't misread it as a missing run.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_duplicate_functionsNear-duplicate function pairsARead-onlyIdempotent
Lists near-duplicate function pairs in the newest run, at most 50. Use it before a refactor so twins are folded together, and get_function_brief for one function's twins. It reads the run's stored index, whose first build takes seconds on a large repo, skips functions with under 8 lines of their own and nested pairs, and an empty list means no pair reached similarity. similarity is shared shingles over the smaller function: 1.0 admits only a function found whole inside another, 0.8 four lines in five, and repo may be any directory under the checkout.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory | |
| similarity | No | containment threshold, shared over smaller, 0 to 1 (default 0.8) |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| pairs | No | pairs at or above similarity, best containment first, at most 50 |
| run_id | No | the newest run whose rows were compared |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already cover read-only, idempotent, closed-world, non-destructive, but the description adds behavior they cannot: it reads a stored run index whose first build takes seconds on a large repo, skips functions under 8 lines and nested pairs, and defines what an empty result means. This is substantial operational context beyond the annotation set.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Front-loaded with purpose and cap, then usage, then behavior and the threshold semantics. It is a dense multi-clause run-on, but nearly every clause carries information an agent needs; no filler sentences.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return format need not be described, and the description still covers the count cap, the empty-list case, threshold semantics, index-build latency, and excluded items. Nothing an agent needs to call and interpret this correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description genuinely extends meaning: it concretizes the similarity scale ('1.0 admits only a function found whole inside another, 0.8 four lines in five') and clarifies that repo may be any directory under the checkout. It stops short of restating the default or the ~ expansion, which live in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Lists near-duplicate function pairs in the newest run, at most 50') and immediately distinguishes itself from get_function_brief, which handles a single function's twins. An agent can tell what it returns and how it differs from its sibling without opening either schema.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Gives a clear triggering context ('Use it before a refactor so twins are folded together') and routes to the per-function alternative (get_function_brief). It does not state any when-not condition or prerequisite beyond that, so it falls just short of the full when/when-not/alternatives bar.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_runsScored run historyARead-onlyIdempotent
Lists every run in the store, oldest first by id. Use it to see which commit the other tools answer from, get_trend for totals and get_function_history for one function. Marking the baseline run costs one git ancestry check per trusted run's commit, newest first, down to it: one when it is the newest, on any branch, none with no trusted run. repo may be any directory under the checkout, and a relative path resolves from the server's start directory. With no crapkit.toml above it, or no snapshot store yet, it answers isError true with the command to run.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| runs | No | every run in the store, oldest first |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Goes well beyond the readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive annotations: discloses the git ancestry-check cost of marking a baseline, the error behavior (isError true with the command to run) when no config or store exists, and repo path resolution rules. These are non-obvious behaviors an agent needs before calling.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Purpose and ordering are front-loaded in the first sentence, followed by usage routing and behavioral caveats. The ancestry-cost clause is dense and hard to parse, but every sentence carries information rather than filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With an output schema present, return values need no explanation, and annotations already cover the safety profile. The description nonetheless covers path semantics and the failure mode, leaving nothing an agent needs to call it correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds meaning beyond the schema by stating repo may be any directory under the checkout and that a relative path resolves from the server's start directory, clarifying resolution behavior the schema does not cover.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Lists every run in the store') plus ordering ('oldest first by id'). It also distinguishes itself from siblings by naming get_trend for totals and get_function_history for single-function history, so an agent can separate it without opening the schemas.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Gives a clear primary use case ('see which commit the other tools answer from') and explicitly names the sibling tools that serve related needs. It does not state exclusions or when not to call it, but the routing context is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_worklistRisk ranking of every functionARead-onlyIdempotent
Lists the newest trusted run's whole risk ranking, every admitted function ordered by ccn times recency-weighted churn. Use it to survey a repo or split work, and get_next_item for the one packet to fix now. It runs no tests and keeps finished rows, so it never empties. Churn is cached per HEAD: after a commit, or on first use, the next read walks git log. git ls-files and git status count changed scored files (scored_changes). scope narrows before top caps, and an unknown scope is a config error. repo may be any directory under the measured checkout.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| top | No | cap the active list (default: the config's worklist_top, 50) | |
| repo | No | path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory | |
| scope | No | restrict the ranking to these declared scopes (exact [[scope]] names from crapkit.toml, one --scope each) |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| floor | No | the effective worklist_floor: rows under this ccn are listed only when over their ceiling or in a hot file |
| stale | No | true when the run's commit is not HEAD. It judges the commit, not the files: an amend or a commit that touched no scored file sets it, and an uncommitted edit leaves it false; scored_changes counts the files whose content moved. Schema 2 redefines it as that content difference |
| active | No | the ranking: functions in files with churn in the window, risk descending, cut at top or worklist_top |
| commit | No | that run's commit, full sha |
| run_id | No | id of the run these numbers come from: the newest trusted run (a coverage run, or a verify run whose verdict passed) |
| schema | No | payload schema version, 1 |
| shallow | No | true when this checkout is a shallow clone: commits, authors and the churn the ranking reads count only the commits the clone holds; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallow for the real counts |
| commands | No | the call that answers stale and scored_changes; run it as given |
| truncated | No | present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer |
| dormant_top | No | the first 10 dormant functions, same shape as active: sleeping hazards kept out of the queue |
| active_total | No | active rows admitted before the cap: what top or worklist_top hid |
| dormant_count | No | ranked functions whose file had no commits in the window |
| scored_changes | No | how many files the run scored hold other content now than the run recorded, deleted files included; 0 means the numbers describe the files on disk; null when crapkit cannot compare: the run recorded no content (crapkit 0.8.0 or older wrote it) or git failed reading the tree; treat null like any count above 0 and run commands.refresh |
| churn_window_months | No | months of git history the churn weights cover, counted back from the commit date of HEAD |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already cover read-only/idempotent/non-destructive, but the description adds behavior the annotations cannot: it runs no tests, keeps finished rows so it never empties, and caches churn per HEAD so a commit or first use triggers a git log walk. That is exactly the non-obvious operational context an agent needs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Front-loaded with the core purpose and the routing hint, and every sentence carries information (caching, git behavior, cap/scope ordering, repo path). Dense jargon like 'ccn times recency-weighted churn' is compressible but still meaningful, so it falls just short of a 5.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return values need no explanation. For a read-only listing tool with three optional params, the description closes the real gaps: caching/refresh triggers, empty-list expectations, config-error conditions, and scope-vs-top ordering. Nothing needed to call it correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description earns above baseline by adding interaction semantics not in the schema: scope narrows the ranking before top caps it, an unknown scope is a config error, and repo may be any directory under the measured checkout. It does not restate the schema's own defaults.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Lists the newest trusted run's whole risk ranking, every admitted function') and gives the exact ordering metric (ccn times recency-weighted churn). This clearly separates it from get_next_item (single packet) and list_runs (run list), so an agent can route without opening schemas.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Names the two use cases (survey a repo, split work) and explicitly routes the alternative: 'get_next_item for the one packet to fix now.' It also gives a usage constraint — scope narrows before top caps, and an unknown scope is a config error — so the agent knows both when to pick it and how to invoke it safely.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
12 tool updates
v0.8.1- Changed
check_config3 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - added
Output schema / properties / lanes / items / properties / refusalAdded value: +{ + "description": "why --reuse-artifacts will not score the lane's artifact on disk: the lane's last attempt wrote no artifact and the file predates it, or .crapkit/artifacts.json cannot be read; null when reuse would score it", + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] +} - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
check_gate12 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / path / descriptionPrevious value: -"repo-relative, or absolute inside repo, source file to judge as edited. Outside the repo or missing answers a config error, and an unchanged or unscoped file judges 0. repo may be any directory under the checkout, and path stays relative to the root it walks up to."New value: +"repo-relative, or absolute inside repo, source file to judge as edited. Outside the repo, missing or a directory answers a config error, and an unchanged or unscoped file judges 0. A file a scope takes whose name is not UTF-8 answers gate.ok false with the name in gate.unread_files. repo may be any directory under the checkout, and path stays relative to the root it walks up to." - changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - changed
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / cov / descriptionPrevious value: -"branch coverage from the baseline run, 0.0 to 1.0"New value: +"from the baseline run: branch coverage inside the span, 0.0 to 1.0; statement coverage when the span has no branches, and invoked-or-not (1.0 or 0.0) when it has no statements; Python and/or add to ccn but coverage.py records no branch arc for them; 0.0 on an untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only row" - changed
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / crap / descriptionPrevious value: -"score from fresh ccn and baseline cov"New value: +"score from fresh ccn and baseline cov: ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn, or ccn on a cc-only or excluded row" - changed
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / flag / descriptionPrevious value: -"measured, untested, no-lane or cc-only: whether a lane artifact could measure this span"New value: +"measured, untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only: whether a lane artifact could measure this span" - changed
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / flag / enumPrevious value: -[ - "measured", - "untested", - "no-lane", - "cc-only" -]New value: +[ + "measured", + "untested", + "excluded", + "no-lane", + "cc-only" +] - added
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / unmeasuredAdded value: +{ + "description": "true when no measurement stands behind cov: the baseline run holds no row this function joins by name (it was added or renamed since), or its scope has no lane or asks for none. cov 0.0 is then a stand-in", + "type": "boolean" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / gate / properties / breaches / items / properties / cov / descriptionPrevious value: -"baseline coverage"New value: +"from the baseline run: branch coverage inside the span, 0.0 to 1.0; statement coverage when the span has no branches, and invoked-or-not (1.0 or 0.0) when it has no statements; Python and/or add to ccn but coverage.py records no branch arc for them; 0.0 on an untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only row" - changed
Output schema / properties / gate / properties / breaches / items / properties / crap / descriptionPrevious value: -"score"New value: +"score: ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn, or ccn on a cc-only or excluded row" - changed
Output schema / properties / gate / properties / ok / descriptionPrevious value: -"true when breaches is empty; false is the verdict (CLI exit 6), delivered as a normal result"New value: +"true when breaches and unread_files are empty; false is the verdict (CLI exit 6, or 3 when a file's name is not UTF-8), delivered as a normal result" - added
Output schema / properties / gate / properties / unread_filesAdded value: +{ + "description": "changed files no reader could read, so none of their functions was judged; any entry fails the gate (exit 6, or for a file whose name is not UTF-8 the exit-3 refusal, which check_gate answers as this verdict)", + "items": { + "description": "one changed file the gate refused unread", + "properties": { + "dirty": { + "description": "always true here: the gate judges the working tree's changes since HEAD", + "type": "boolean" + }, + "path": { + "description": "repo-relative path of the file, each byte that is not UTF-8 spelled \\xNN", + "type": "string" + }, + "reason": { + "description": "the reader's refusal, naming the line and what to change", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" +} - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
get_function_brief18 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / name / descriptionPrevious value: -"the bare identifier (classify, or route for a Rust `route cmd : & Cmd`) or the whole long_name get_next_item printed (classify( score , late )); both resolve, exact match first"New value: +"the long_name get_next_item printed (classify( score , late )), the bare identifier (classify, or route for a Rust `route cmd : & Cmd`), a fragment of either, the line the function starts on, or a handle such as NAME#2 for a twin or (anonymous)#2; exact match first" - changed
Input schema / properties / path / descriptionPrevious value: -"repo-relative source file, forward slashes"New value: +"source file, repo-relative or absolute inside the repo; a backslash separates folders on Windows only" - changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - changed
Output schema / properties / commands / properties / refresh / descriptionPrevious value: -"crapkit coverage --reuse-unchanged: the cheapest run that clears stale"New value: +"crapkit coverage --reuse-unchanged: the cheapest run that brings scored_changes to 0 and clears stale" - changed
Output schema / properties / duplication_twins / items / properties / contained / descriptionPrevious value: -"true when every shingle of the smaller function appears in the larger: one can call the other"New value: +"true when the twin and this function nest in one file, one defined inside the other" - changed
Output schema / properties / est_uncovered_paths / descriptionPrevious value: -"round((1 - cov) x ccn)"New value: +"(1 - cov) x ccn rounded half to even, so 2.5 reads 2" - changed
Output schema / properties / file_functions / items / properties / crap / descriptionPrevious value: -"score"New value: +"score: ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn, or ccn on a cc-only or excluded row" - changed
Output schema / properties / file_totals / properties / crap_load / descriptionPrevious value: -"sum of crap over the file"New value: +"exact sum of crap over the file (math.fsum), two decimals" - changed
Output schema / properties / scored / properties / cov / descriptionPrevious value: -"branch coverage 0.0 to 1.0"New value: +"branch coverage inside the span, 0.0 to 1.0; statement coverage when the span has no branches, and invoked-or-not (1.0 or 0.0) when it has no statements; Python and/or add to ccn but coverage.py records no branch arc for them; 0.0 on an untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only row" - changed
Output schema / properties / scored / properties / crap / descriptionPrevious value: -"the score: ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn"New value: +"the score: ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn, or ccn on a cc-only or excluded row" - changed
Output schema / properties / scored / properties / flag / descriptionPrevious value: -"measured, untested, no-lane or cc-only: whether a lane artifact could measure this span"New value: +"measured, untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only: whether a lane artifact could measure this span" - changed
Output schema / properties / scored / properties / flag / enumPrevious value: -[ - "measured", - "untested", - "no-lane", - "cc-only" -]New value: +[ + "measured", + "untested", + "excluded", + "no-lane", + "cc-only" +] - added
Output schema / properties / scored_changesAdded value: +{ + "description": "how many files the run scored hold other content now than the run recorded, deleted files included; 0 means the numbers describe the files on disk; null when crapkit cannot compare: the run recorded no content (crapkit 0.8.0 or older wrote it) or git failed reading the tree; treat null like any count above 0 and run commands.refresh", + "type": [ + "integer", + "null" + ] +} - added
Output schema / properties / shallowAdded value: +{ + "description": "true when this checkout is a shallow clone: churn and gate_rule.mark_age_days count only the commits the clone holds; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallow for the real counts", + "type": "boolean" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / stale / descriptionPrevious value: -"true when the run's commit is not HEAD, so every number here describes an older tree; run commands.refresh first"New value: +"true when the run's commit is not HEAD. It judges the commit, not the files: an amend or a commit that touched no scored file sets it, and an uncommitted edit leaves it false; scored_changes counts the files whose content moved. Schema 2 redefines it as that content difference" - changed
Output schema / properties / target / descriptionPrevious value: -"this scope's effective ccn ceiling, the same value as gate_rule.ceiling"New value: +"this scope's effective ceiling: the highest CRAP a function may carry, and so also the highest ccn; the same value as gate_rule.ceiling" - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +} - added
Output schema / properties / unmeasuredAdded value: +{ + "description": "true when no measurement stands behind cov: flag no-lane (no lane covers the scope) or cc-only (the scope asks for no coverage). cov 0.0 and est_uncovered_paths are then stand-ins, not a count of paths no test walks", + "type": "boolean" +}
- Changed
get_function_history8 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / name / descriptionPrevious value: -"the bare identifier (classify, or route for a Rust `route cmd : & Cmd`) or the whole long_name get_next_item printed (classify( score , late )); both resolve, exact match first"New value: +"the long_name get_next_item printed (classify( score , late )), the bare identifier (classify, or route for a Rust `route cmd : & Cmd`), a fragment of either, the line the function starts on, or a handle such as NAME#2 for a twin or (anonymous)#2; exact match first" - changed
Input schema / properties / path / descriptionPrevious value: -"repo-relative source file, forward slashes"New value: +"source file, repo-relative or absolute inside the repo; a backslash separates folders on Windows only" - changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - changed
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / history / items / properties / cov / descriptionPrevious value: -"branch coverage 0.0 to 1.0; null on an inventory run"New value: +"branch coverage inside the span, 0.0 to 1.0; statement coverage when the span has no branches, and invoked-or-not (1.0 or 0.0) when it has no statements; Python and/or add to ccn but coverage.py records no branch arc for them; 0.0 on an untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only row; null on an inventory run" - changed
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / history / items / properties / crap / descriptionPrevious value: -"score; null on an inventory run"New value: +"score: ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn, or ccn on a cc-only or excluded row; null on an inventory run" - changed
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / history / items / properties / flag / descriptionPrevious value: -"measured, untested, no-lane or cc-only; null on an inventory-only run"New value: +"measured, untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only; null on an inventory-only run" - changed
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / history / items / properties / flag / enumPrevious value: -[ - "measured", - "untested", - "no-lane", - "cc-only", - null -]New value: +[ + "measured", + "untested", + "excluded", + "no-lane", + "cc-only", + null +] - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
get_next_item21 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - added
Output schema / properties / commandsAdded value: +{ + "description": "the call that answers stale and scored_changes; run it as given", + "properties": { + "refresh": { + "description": "crapkit coverage --reuse-unchanged: the cheapest run that brings scored_changes to 0 and clears stale", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / item / properties / cov / descriptionPrevious value: -"branch coverage inside the span, 0.0 to 1.0"New value: +"branch coverage inside the span, 0.0 to 1.0; statement coverage when the span has no branches, and invoked-or-not (1.0 or 0.0) when it has no statements; Python and/or add to ccn but coverage.py records no branch arc for them; 0.0 on an untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only row" - changed
Output schema / properties / item / properties / crap / descriptionPrevious value: -"the score: ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn"New value: +"the score: ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn, or ccn on a cc-only or excluded row" - changed
Output schema / properties / item / properties / est_uncovered_paths / descriptionPrevious value: -"round((1 - cov) x ccn): decision paths no test walks"New value: +"(1 - cov) x ccn rounded half to even, so 2.5 reads 2: decision paths no test walks" - changed
Output schema / properties / item / properties / flag / descriptionPrevious value: -"measured, untested, no-lane or cc-only: whether a lane artifact could measure this span"New value: +"measured, untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only: whether a lane artifact could measure this span" - changed
Output schema / properties / item / properties / flag / enumPrevious value: -[ - "measured", - "untested", - "no-lane", - "cc-only" -]New value: +[ + "measured", + "untested", + "excluded", + "no-lane", + "cc-only" +] - changed
Output schema / properties / item / properties / target / descriptionPrevious value: -"this scope's effective ccn ceiling"New value: +"this scope's effective ceiling: the highest CRAP a function may carry, and so also the highest ccn" - added
Output schema / properties / item / properties / unmeasuredAdded value: +{ + "description": "true when no measurement stands behind cov: flag no-lane (no lane covers the scope) or cc-only (the scope asks for no coverage). cov 0.0 and est_uncovered_paths are then stand-ins, not a count of paths no test walks", + "type": "boolean" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / items / items / properties / cov / descriptionPrevious value: -"branch coverage inside the span, 0.0 to 1.0"New value: +"branch coverage inside the span, 0.0 to 1.0; statement coverage when the span has no branches, and invoked-or-not (1.0 or 0.0) when it has no statements; Python and/or add to ccn but coverage.py records no branch arc for them; 0.0 on an untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only row" - changed
Output schema / properties / items / items / properties / crap / descriptionPrevious value: -"the score: ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn"New value: +"the score: ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn, or ccn on a cc-only or excluded row" - changed
Output schema / properties / items / items / properties / est_uncovered_paths / descriptionPrevious value: -"round((1 - cov) x ccn): decision paths no test walks"New value: +"(1 - cov) x ccn rounded half to even, so 2.5 reads 2: decision paths no test walks" - changed
Output schema / properties / items / items / properties / flag / descriptionPrevious value: -"measured, untested, no-lane or cc-only: whether a lane artifact could measure this span"New value: +"measured, untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only: whether a lane artifact could measure this span" - changed
Output schema / properties / items / items / properties / flag / enumPrevious value: -[ - "measured", - "untested", - "no-lane", - "cc-only" -]New value: +[ + "measured", + "untested", + "excluded", + "no-lane", + "cc-only" +] - changed
Output schema / properties / items / items / properties / target / descriptionPrevious value: -"this scope's effective ccn ceiling"New value: +"this scope's effective ceiling: the highest CRAP a function may carry, and so also the highest ccn" - added
Output schema / properties / items / items / properties / unmeasuredAdded value: +{ + "description": "true when no measurement stands behind cov: flag no-lane (no lane covers the scope) or cc-only (the scope asks for no coverage). cov 0.0 and est_uncovered_paths are then stand-ins, not a count of paths no test walks", + "type": "boolean" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / reasons / descriptionPrevious value: -"why the queue is empty, present only when empty is true; the stop condition is empty true with skipped_claimed and no_lane_over_target both 0 or absent"New value: +"why the queue is empty, present only when empty is true; the stop condition is empty true with skipped_claimed and no_lane_over_target both 0 or absent and scored_changes 0" - added
Output schema / properties / scored_changesAdded value: +{ + "description": "how many files the run scored hold other content now than the run recorded, deleted files included; 0 means the numbers describe the files on disk; null when crapkit cannot compare: the run recorded no content (crapkit 0.8.0 or older wrote it) or git failed reading the tree; treat null like any count above 0 and run commands.refresh", + "type": [ + "integer", + "null" + ] +} - added
Output schema / properties / shallowAdded value: +{ + "description": "true when this checkout is a shallow clone: commits, authors and the churn the ranking reads count only the commits the clone holds; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallow for the real counts", + "type": "boolean" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / stale / descriptionPrevious value: -"true when the run's commit is not HEAD, so cov, crap and uncovered_lines describe an older tree; crapkit coverage --reuse-unchanged (get_function_brief's commands.refresh) clears it"New value: +"true when the run's commit is not HEAD. It judges the commit, not the files: an amend or a commit that touched no scored file sets it, and an uncommitted edit leaves it false; scored_changes counts the files whose content moved. Schema 2 redefines it as that content difference" - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
get_ratchet_report3 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - added
Output schema / properties / shallowAdded value: +{ + "description": "true when this checkout is a shallow clone: ages and repayments count only the commits the clone holds; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallow for the real counts, and crapkit ratchet report --enforce refuses to judge the debt policy there (exit 4)", + "type": "boolean" +} - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
get_trend5 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - changed
Output schema / properties / runs / items / properties / by_scope / additionalProperties / properties / crap_load / descriptionPrevious value: -"sum of crap over the scope"New value: +"exact sum of crap over the scope (math.fsum), two decimals" - changed
Output schema / properties / runs / items / properties / crap_load / descriptionPrevious value: -"sum of every function's crap, two decimals"New value: +"exact sum of every function's crap (math.fsum), two decimals" - changed
Output schema / properties / target / descriptionPrevious value: -"the [crapkit] target: the default ccn ceiling every scope inherits unless it sets its own"New value: +"the [crapkit] target: the default ceiling, the highest CRAP a function may carry, and so also the highest ccn, that every scope inherits unless it sets its own" - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
list_claims2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
list_coupled_files3 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / window_months / descriptionPrevious value: -"months of git history the pairs were counted over (the config's churn_window_months)"New value: +"months of git history the pairs were counted over, back from the commit date of HEAD (the config's churn_window_months)"
- Changed
list_duplicate_functions2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
list_runs2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
list_worklist15 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo / descriptionPrevious value: -"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)"New value: +"path to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in); a leading ~ is the home directory" - changed
Output schema / properties / active / items / properties / cov / descriptionPrevious value: -"branch coverage 0.0 to 1.0; null on an inventory-only run"New value: +"branch coverage inside the span, 0.0 to 1.0; statement coverage when the span has no branches, and invoked-or-not (1.0 or 0.0) when it has no statements; Python and/or add to ccn but coverage.py records no branch arc for them; 0.0 on an untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only row; null on an inventory-only run" - changed
Output schema / properties / active / items / properties / crap / descriptionPrevious value: -"the score from the ranked run; null on an inventory-only run"New value: +"the score from the ranked run, ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn, or ccn on a cc-only or excluded row; null on an inventory-only run" - changed
Output schema / properties / active / items / properties / flag / descriptionPrevious value: -"measured, untested, no-lane or cc-only; null on an inventory-only run"New value: +"measured, untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only; null on an inventory-only run" - changed
Output schema / properties / active / items / properties / flag / enumPrevious value: -[ - "measured", - "untested", - "no-lane", - "cc-only", - null -]New value: +[ + "measured", + "untested", + "excluded", + "no-lane", + "cc-only", + null +] - changed
Output schema / properties / churn_window_months / descriptionPrevious value: -"months of git history the churn weights cover"New value: +"months of git history the churn weights cover, counted back from the commit date of HEAD" - added
Output schema / properties / commandsAdded value: +{ + "description": "the call that answers stale and scored_changes; run it as given", + "properties": { + "refresh": { + "description": "crapkit coverage --reuse-unchanged: the cheapest run that brings scored_changes to 0 and clears stale", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / cov / descriptionPrevious value: -"branch coverage 0.0 to 1.0; null on an inventory-only run"New value: +"branch coverage inside the span, 0.0 to 1.0; statement coverage when the span has no branches, and invoked-or-not (1.0 or 0.0) when it has no statements; Python and/or add to ccn but coverage.py records no branch arc for them; 0.0 on an untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only row; null on an inventory-only run" - changed
Output schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / crap / descriptionPrevious value: -"the score from the ranked run; null on an inventory-only run"New value: +"the score from the ranked run, ccn^2 x (1 - cov)^3 + ccn, or ccn on a cc-only or excluded row; null on an inventory-only run" - changed
Output schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / flag / descriptionPrevious value: -"measured, untested, no-lane or cc-only; null on an inventory-only run"New value: +"measured, untested, excluded, no-lane or cc-only; null on an inventory-only run" - changed
Output schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / flag / enumPrevious value: -[ - "measured", - "untested", - "no-lane", - "cc-only", - null -]New value: +[ + "measured", + "untested", + "excluded", + "no-lane", + "cc-only", + null +] - added
Output schema / properties / scored_changesAdded value: +{ + "description": "how many files the run scored hold other content now than the run recorded, deleted files included; 0 means the numbers describe the files on disk; null when crapkit cannot compare: the run recorded no content (crapkit 0.8.0 or older wrote it) or git failed reading the tree; treat null like any count above 0 and run commands.refresh", + "type": [ + "integer", + "null" + ] +} - added
Output schema / properties / shallowAdded value: +{ + "description": "true when this checkout is a shallow clone: commits, authors and the churn the ranking reads count only the commits the clone holds; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallow for the real counts", + "type": "boolean" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / stale / descriptionPrevious value: -"true when the run's commit is not HEAD, so cov, crap and uncovered_lines describe an older tree; crapkit coverage --reuse-unchanged (get_function_brief's commands.refresh) clears it"New value: +"true when the run's commit is not HEAD. It judges the commit, not the files: an amend or a commit that touched no scored file sets it, and an uncommitted edit leaves it false; scored_changes counts the files whose content moved. Schema 2 redefines it as that content difference" - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "description": "present only when the whole answer was longer than one tool result the server sends (7,500 characters): each list, string or object field it cut, at any depth, keeps its start, and full is the CLI command that prints the whole answer", + "properties": { + "fields": { + "additionalProperties": { + "properties": { + "kept": { + "description": "how many the answer keeps", + "type": "integer" + }, + "of": { + "description": "how many the whole answer has", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "description": "each cut field, named by its keys joined with dots (gate.breaches) -> kept and of: elements for a list, entries for an object, characters for a string", + "type": "object" + }, + "full": { + "description": "the crapkit command that prints the whole answer, spelled for the server's shell", + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
5 tool updates
v0.8.0- Changed
check_config2 fields changed- changed
Output schema / properties / resources / properties / test_retention_count / descriptionPrevious value: -"default test evidence count limit; zero disables it"New value: +"deprecated, always 0: crapkit applies no test evidence retention" - changed
Output schema / properties / resources / properties / test_retention_days / descriptionPrevious value: -"default test evidence age limit; zero disables it"New value: +"deprecated, always 0: crapkit applies no test evidence retention"
- Changed
check_gate7 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / path / descriptionPrevious value: -"repo-relative source file to judge as edited"New value: +"repo-relative, or absolute inside repo, source file to judge as edited. Outside the repo or missing answers a config error, and an unchanged or unscoped file judges 0. repo may be any directory under the checkout, and path stays relative to the root it walks up to." - added
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / occurrenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "source creation order among functions sharing start, from 1; 0 on an older row with no recorded position", + "type": "integer" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, or a Python def's body starts on the line its signature ends, where coverage.py reads it as the def statement, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until they sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)" - changed
Output schema / properties / gate / properties / breaches / items / descriptionPrevious value: -"one judged function over its ceiling that no ratchet mark covers"New value: +"one judged function over its ceiling, unmarked or with its crap past its ratchet mark" - changed
Output schema / properties / gate / properties / breaches / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, or a Python def's body starts on the line its signature ends, where coverage.py reads it as the def statement, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until they sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)" - added
Output schema / properties / gate / properties / ceilings / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +{ + "type": "integer" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / gate / properties / ceilings / descriptionPrevious value: -"map of path to the ccn ceiling it was judged against"New value: +"map of repo-relative path to the ccn ceiling it was judged against"
- Changed
get_function_brief5 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / file_functions / items / properties / occurrenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "source creation order among functions sharing start, from 1; 0 on an older row with no recorded position", + "type": "integer" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / file_functions / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, or a Python def's body starts on the line its signature ends, where coverage.py reads it as the def statement, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until they sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)" - changed
Output schema / properties / regrowth / properties / history / descriptionPrevious value: -"one [run_id, ccn] pair per trusted run that scored the function, oldest first"New value: +"one [run_id, ccn] pair for every stored run that scored the function, whatever its kind, oldest first" - added
Output schema / properties / scored / properties / occurrenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "source creation order among functions sharing start, from 1; 0 on an older row with no recorded position", + "type": "integer" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / scored / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, or a Python def's body starts on the line its signature ends, where coverage.py reads it as the def statement, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until they sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"
- Changed
get_next_item4 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / item / properties / occurrenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "source creation order among functions sharing start, from 1; 0 on an older row with no recorded position", + "type": "integer" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / item / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, or a Python def's body starts on the line its signature ends, where coverage.py reads it as the def statement, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until they sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)" - added
Output schema / properties / items / items / properties / occurrenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "source creation order among functions sharing start, from 1; 0 on an older row with no recorded position", + "type": "integer" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / items / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, or a Python def's body starts on the line its signature ends, where coverage.py reads it as the def statement, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until they sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"
- Changed
list_worklist10 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / active / items / properties / handleAdded value: +{ + "description": "short name form: the bare identifier, or (anonymous)#N for a function lizard could not name; pass it to get_function_brief as name", + "type": "string" +} - added
Output schema / properties / active / items / properties / occurrenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "source creation order among functions sharing start, from 1; 0 on an older row with no recorded position", + "type": "integer" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / active / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok; every row but ok reaches get_next_item when a lane measures it"New value: +"decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok, as the run judged it; null on an inventory-only run. A row a lane measures reaches get_next_item unless its remedy is ok. After a crapkit.toml ceiling edit no run has scored, get_next_item's own remedy decides that, and it can differ from this one" - changed
Output schema / properties / active / items / properties / remedy / enumPrevious value: -[ - "decompose", - "split-lines", - "add-tests", - "ok" -]New value: +[ + "decompose", + "split-lines", + "add-tests", + "ok", + null +] - changed
Output schema / properties / active / items / properties / remedy / typePrevious value: -"string"New value: +[ + "string", + "null" +] - added
Output schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / handleAdded value: +{ + "description": "short name form: the bare identifier, or (anonymous)#N for a function lizard could not name; pass it to get_function_brief as name", + "type": "string" +} - added
Output schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / occurrenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "source creation order among functions sharing start, from 1; 0 on an older row with no recorded position", + "type": "integer" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok; every row but ok reaches get_next_item when a lane measures it"New value: +"decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok, as the run judged it; null on an inventory-only run. A row a lane measures reaches get_next_item unless its remedy is ok. After a crapkit.toml ceiling edit no run has scored, get_next_item's own remedy decides that, and it can differ from this one" - changed
Output schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / remedy / enumPrevious value: -[ - "decompose", - "split-lines", - "add-tests", - "ok" -]New value: +[ + "decompose", + "split-lines", + "add-tests", + "ok", + null +] - changed
Output schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / remedy / typePrevious value: -"string"New value: +[ + "string", + "null" +]
4 tool updates
v0.7.6- Changed
check_gate4 fields changed- changed
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)" - changed
Output schema / properties / functions / items / properties / remedy / enumPrevious value: -[ - "decompose", - "add-tests", - "ok" -]New value: +[ + "decompose", + "split-lines", + "add-tests", + "ok" +] - changed
Output schema / properties / gate / properties / breaches / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)" - changed
Output schema / properties / gate / properties / breaches / items / properties / remedy / enumPrevious value: -[ - "decompose", - "add-tests", - "ok" -]New value: +[ + "decompose", + "split-lines", + "add-tests", + "ok" +]
- Changed
get_function_brief6 fields changed- changed
Output schema / properties / file_functions / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)" - changed
Output schema / properties / file_functions / items / properties / remedy / enumPrevious value: -[ - "decompose", - "add-tests", - "ok" -]New value: +[ + "decompose", + "split-lines", + "add-tests", + "ok" +] - changed
Output schema / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose, add-tests or ok: the branch the session takes; scored.remedy carries the same value"New value: +"decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok: the branch the session takes; scored.remedy carries the same value" - changed
Output schema / properties / remedy / enumPrevious value: -[ - "decompose", - "add-tests", - "ok" -]New value: +[ + "decompose", + "split-lines", + "add-tests", + "ok" +] - changed
Output schema / properties / scored / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)" - changed
Output schema / properties / scored / properties / remedy / enumPrevious value: -[ - "decompose", - "add-tests", - "ok" -]New value: +[ + "decompose", + "split-lines", + "add-tests", + "ok" +]
- Changed
get_next_item4 fields changed- changed
Output schema / properties / item / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)" - changed
Output schema / properties / item / properties / remedy / enumPrevious value: -[ - "decompose", - "add-tests", - "ok" -]New value: +[ + "decompose", + "split-lines", + "add-tests", + "ok" +] - changed
Output schema / properties / items / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)" - changed
Output schema / properties / items / items / properties / remedy / enumPrevious value: -[ - "decompose", - "add-tests", - "ok" -]New value: +[ + "decompose", + "split-lines", + "add-tests", + "ok" +]
- Changed
list_worklist4 fields changed- changed
Output schema / properties / active / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose, add-tests or ok; only decompose and add-tests rows with a lane reach get_next_item"New value: +"decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok; every row but ok reaches get_next_item when a lane measures it" - changed
Output schema / properties / active / items / properties / remedy / enumPrevious value: -[ - "decompose", - "add-tests", - "ok" -]New value: +[ + "decompose", + "split-lines", + "add-tests", + "ok" +] - changed
Output schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / remedy / descriptionPrevious value: -"decompose, add-tests or ok; only decompose and add-tests rows with a lane reach get_next_item"New value: +"decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok; every row but ok reaches get_next_item when a lane measures it" - changed
Output schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / remedy / enumPrevious value: -[ - "decompose", - "add-tests", - "ok" -]New value: +[ + "decompose", + "split-lines", + "add-tests", + "ok" +]
1 tool update
v0.7.2- Changed
check_config1 field changed- added
Output schema / properties / resourcesAdded value: +{ + "description": "effective resource policy; limits and estimates, not sampled utilization", + "properties": { + "available_cpus": { + "description": "CPUs visible to this process", + "type": "integer" + }, + "budget_directory": { + "description": "coordination directory; status does not create it", + "type": "string" + }, + "coordination": { + "description": "worker slot ownership scope", + "type": "string" + }, + "cpu_probe": { + "description": "CPU affinity or fallback probe used", + "type": "string" + }, + "default_chunks_per_worker": { + "description": "chunk target used by automatic pool sizing", + "type": "integer" + }, + "default_source_bytes_per_worker": { + "description": "source-byte target for automatic spawn sizing; null for other start methods", + "type": [ + "integer", + "null" + ] + }, + "estimated_pool_memory_mb": { + "description": "estimated memory for the allowed worker count", + "type": "integer" + }, + "inherited_analysis_workers": { + "description": "valid inherited worker ceiling or null", + "type": [ + "integer", + "null" + ] + }, + "log_max_bytes": { + "description": "byte limit per current and backup lane log; zero is unlimited", + "type": "integer" + }, + "memory_budget_mb": { + "description": "inherited memory sizing hint or null", + "type": [ + "integer", + "null" + ] + }, + "memory_is_hard_limit": { + "description": "false: memory policy sizes workers without an OS allocation limit", + "type": "boolean" + }, + "pool_worker_limit": { + "description": "per-pool ceiling after CPU, memory and inherited limits", + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_analysis_workers": { + "description": "configured per-pool ceiling; zero selects the default", + "type": "integer" + }, + "serial_fallback": { + "description": "busy slots allow serial work without waiting", + "type": "boolean" + }, + "shared_pool_limit": { + "description": "shared numbered pool slot ceiling", + "type": "integer" + }, + "test_retention_count": { + "description": "default test evidence count limit; zero disables it", + "type": "integer" + }, + "test_retention_days": { + "description": "default test evidence age limit; zero disables it", + "type": "integer" + }, + "worker_memory_estimate_mb": { + "description": "memory estimate per analysis worker", + "type": "integer" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
1 tool update
v0.7.0- Changed
get_function_brief2 fields changed- changed
Output schema / properties / commands / properties / refresh_writes_run / descriptionPrevious value: -"always true: refresh is the one command here that writes a run to the store; the other three change nothing"New value: +"always true: refresh writes a coverage run to the store; other commands can also write caches or test artifacts" - changed
Output schema / properties / commands / properties / scoped_tests / descriptionPrevious value: -"this scope's own test command with the file filled in, or null when the scope declares no [crapkit.scoped_tests] template"New value: +"the crapkit test-scoped call for this literal file, or null when the scope declares no [crapkit.scoped_tests] template"
22 tool updates
v0.6.0- Removed
brief - Added
check_config - Added
check_gate - Removed
coupling - Removed
doctor - Removed
duplication - Removed
explain - Removed
gate - Added
get_function_brief - Added
get_function_history - Added
get_next_item - Added
get_ratchet_report - Added
get_trend - Added
list_claims - Added
list_coupled_files - Added
list_duplicate_functions - Added
list_runs - Added
list_worklist - Removed
next_item - Removed
ratchet_report - Removed
runs - Removed
worklist
5 tool updates
v0.5.0- Changed
brief1 field changed- added
Input schema / requiredAdded value: +[ + "path", + "name" +]
- Changed
explain3 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / historyAdded value: +{ + "description": "also list the commits that touched this function (git log -L), as `commits`", + "type": "boolean" +} - added
Input schema / properties / testsAdded value: +{ + "description": "also list the tests covering this function (coverage.py contexts), as `tests`", + "type": "boolean" +} - added
Input schema / requiredAdded value: +[ + "path", + "name" +]
- Added
gate - Changed
next_item1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / scopeAdded value: +{ + "description": "restrict the ranking to these declared scopes (exact names from crapkit.toml, one --scope each)", + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" +}
- Changed
worklist1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / scopeAdded value: +{ + "description": "restrict the ranking to these declared scopes (exact names from crapkit.toml, one --scope each)", + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" +}
9 tool updates
v0.4.13- First observed
brief - First observed
coupling - First observed
doctor - First observed
duplication - First observed
explain - First observed
next_item - First observed
ratchet_report - First observed
runs - First observed
worklist
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Tools mostly target distinct resources, and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference siblings (get_next_item for the one packet, list_worklist for the ranking, get_function_brief once chosen; list_coupled_files vs list_duplicate_functions). There is mild clustering around 'what to fix' (list_worklist, get_next_item, get_function_brief, list_claims) and around cross-run analysis (get_trend, get_function_history, get_ratchet_report), but each boundary is spelled out.
Every tool follows a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_* (list_runs, list_worklist, list_coupled_files, list_duplicate_functions, list_claims), get_* (get_next_item, get_trend, get_function_brief, get_function_history, get_ratchet_report), and check_* (check_config, check_gate). No mixed conventions or vague verbs.
12 tools sits squarely in the well-scoped 3-15 range and each maps to a real operation in the crapkit workflow (discover, survey, pick, inspect, gate-check, audit debt). No obvious filler or redundant entries.
The surface covers the analysis lifecycle: runs, config validation, work selection, per-function detail, trends, coupling, duplication, ratchet debt, gate checks, and claims listing. Gaps exist — no tool writes a claim (explicitly CLI-only) and no tool marks the baseline run — but these are documented and workable around.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
AI-native git hosting — repos, PRs, issues, CI gates, and AI code review over MCP (60 tools).
Repo intel for AI coding agents: overview, PRs, contributors, hot files, CI, deps. Remote MCP.
GitHub repo maintainability verdicts—maintained, slowing, at-risk, abandoned—via MCP.
Read-only MCP access to stepcode.dev's how-to corpus: analysis pages by tool.
Related MCP Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables access to Codacy's code quality platform through natural language, providing repository management, security analysis, pull request reviews, and local CLI-based code analysis. Supports comprehensive code quality monitoring including issues, coverage, security vulnerabilities, and technical debt assessment across organizations and repositories.786 npm59MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenancePHP static analysis MCP server with 11 tools for querying 60+ code quality metrics, detecting problems (God Class, dependency cycles, SOLID violations), analyzing dependencies, identifying refactoring priorities, and mapping test coverage — all from live analysis data.111 npm92MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDocGuard, an official, zero-dependency Node.js MCP server (npm: docguard-cli, docguard mcp) exposing 5 read-only doc-governance tools: guard, score, explain, verify-claims, diagnose.111,181 npm230 PyPI32MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDiffgate MCP server acts as a code review engine, enabling AI coding agents to analyze and validate code diffs before application. It enhances AI workflows by providing self-checking capabilities to optimise and secure code changes.753 npm5Apache 2.0