Skip to main content
Glama

crapkit

ci PyPI Python License: MIT crapkit MCP server

crapkit init, coverage and worklist --top 5 on a small Python repo, then a shell heredoc adding a function at ccn 7: the per-edit advisory reports it and exits 2, and the commit gate refuses the staged file with exit 6

crapkit scores every function in your repo on complexity times uncovered risk, ranks the worst ones by how often the file changes, and blocks commits that add more. It reads Python, TypeScript, TSX, JavaScript, Swift, Go, Rust, shell, PowerShell, C and C++, Objective-C, Vue, Java and Zig through lizard, and joins per-function branch coverage from the istanbul or coverage.py artifact your own test command already writes. JSON commands use sorted keys and a versioned schema for scripts, coding agents and the optional MCP server.

CRAP = ccn^2 * (1 - cov)^3 + ccn

The name is not ours: C.R.A.P. (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) was coined for crap4j by Alberto Savoia and Bob Evans in 2007.

ccn is the smaller of standard and modified cyclomatic complexity, both read off one lizard pass. cov is branch coverage inside the function's span; with no branches it falls back to statement coverage, and with no statements to invoked-or-not, so a half-executed straight-line function never reads as fully covered.

Above the ceiling, coverage cannot save you. Decompose. At the default target of 6, a function at ccn 7 with 100% coverage still scores 7 and still fails the gate. The only move that clears it is splitting the function.

Why 6 and not 30. crap4j's conventional threshold of 30 is a CRAP score: it lets an untested ccn 5 through (25 + 5 = 30) and a fully covered ccn 30 too. crapkit's default is a complexity ceiling, because coverage can at best collapse CRAP to ccn, and a function you cannot cover past ccn 6 is one you decompose. Set target = 30 in crapkit.toml if you want the crap4j number. A repo with existing debt does not need to: ratchet seed marks today's over-ceiling functions at today's score, the gate then judges only the functions a change touches, and marks may only fall, so adoption never starts with a wall of red. Next to crap4py, radon, xenon, wily and SonarQube: docs/comparison.md.

crapkit scores git-tracked files only. Source you have not git added is invisible to it.

Start with

When

Install and the 60-second start

You want the first score in an existing Git repository.

Python or TypeScript quickstart

You want a worked example from setup through a passing verify.

Adoption

You need to choose scopes, wire tests or introduce a ratchet to existing debt.

Upgrading

You already have saved runs, ratchet marks or an installed plugin.

Subcommands and JSON/MCP reference

You are scripting commands or connecting a coding agent.


The 60-second start

pip install crapkit
cd your-repo
crapkit init        # write crapkit.toml and ignore measurement output
crapkit doctor      # check scopes, test commands and coverage dependencies
crapkit coverage    # runs the lane, joins coverage, stores a scored run
crapkit worklist    # the ranked risk map
crapkit ratchet seed
git add crapkit.toml crapkit-ratchet.tsv .gitignore

Not a Python repo? uvx crapkit init runs the same commands and adds nothing to your manifest: see A repo that is not Python.

init detects pytest, Vitest and Jest from the repository's own files. Review the generated config before running its commands. When detection leaves a commented lane, fill it in using the lane recipes. Commit the adoption files, then run crapkit verify to establish a passing verdict. Install the commit gate when the config and ratchet are ready.

coverage scores, worklist ranks:

$ crapkit coverage
run 1 @ fae4db93108: 2 functions scored: 2 measured, 1 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 41.0, grade F
-> next: crapkit worklist

$ crapkit worklist
worklist @ fae4db93108 (run 1, floor ccn>=5, churn 12mo) - 1 of 1 active (worklist_top 50), 0 dormant
  risk     14.0  ccn  14  crap    38.5  cov  50%    1c/1a  calc/grade.py:7  classify( score , attempts , late , bonus )

risk 14.0 is ccn times a churn weight of one: a one-commit repo has no spread of commits to weight, so each commit counts once and the ranking is complexity order until the history grows (Risk). crap 38.5 and cov 50% are the score and the coverage behind it.

ratchet seed signs today's debt at today's score. From then on marks only ever fall, so the repo can get better and never worse while you burn it down.

One thing stops most first runs: the coverage plugin. init writes a lane that shells out to your own test runner, and the runner needs its coverage package installed: pytest-cov for pytest, @vitest/coverage-v8 (pinned to your vitest major) for vitest. Without it the lane produces no artifact and coverage exits 5 quoting the runner's own error. For pytest, init probes the python its lane will run and prints the install command when pytest_cov is missing; pip install "crapkit[py]" pulls the plugin alongside crapkit when the two share a venv. On a Windows PATH holding only the py launcher it writes py, not a python3 the lane could never run, and when cmd.exe cannot start the interpreter at all (exit 9009, the Store alias) it names that instead of guessing at pytest-cov. A repo that pins no lockfile and carries its own .venv gets that venv's interpreter in the lane, when that interpreter can import pytest, rather than whichever python the shell answers with. The two quickstarts below walk a real repo end to end.

On Windows a lane command is read by cmd.exe, the shell that will run it, not by sh. Double quotes are the portable quoting. A single-quoted value is refused at config load with exit 3, because cmd.exe would hand pytest five words and the lane would write no artifact:

# the lane in crapkit.toml
command = "python -m pytest -m 'not live and not perf' --cov=calc --cov-branch --cov-report=json:.crapkit/cov/py.json"

$ crapkit doctor
crapkit: lane 'py': positional argument 'live' narrows a full-suite coverage run; drop it, attach it to the flag it belongs to (-n8, --numprocesses=8), or set full_suite = false deliberately (cmd.exe does not treat ' as a quote: write the value in double quotes); a suite whose testpaths cannot be collected in one process needs one lane per testpath, each with full_suite = false and its own artifact

Write it -m "not live and not perf". Carets, && and | segments, redirections and empty quoted arguments all read the way the shell reads them, so a chained lane (cd tests && python -m pytest --cov ...) is checked one segment at a time. doctor reads a lane the same way, and FAILs one whose runner will not start.

Related MCP server: PhpCodeArcheology

Install

pip install crapkit

That is the release on PyPI. For the unreleased tip of main, or from a local clone (run at the clone root):

pip install git+https://github.com/JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit.git
pip install .

A repo that is not Python

crapkit is a command-line tool, never a dependency of the code it scores. A TypeScript, Go or Rust repo adds nothing to its own manifest. With uv on the machine, uvx fetches crapkit into a cache of its own and runs it:

$ uvx crapkit init
wrote crapkit.toml with 1 scope(s): src
detected 1 lane(s) from this repo's own files: js - next: run `crapkit coverage`
added to .gitignore: .crapkit/

$ uvx crapkit coverage
$ uvx crapkit worklist

The lane still runs your own test runner, so Vitest or Jest and its coverage package come from the repo's node_modules as they do today. uv tool install crapkit or pipx install crapkit puts a crapkit command on PATH once, which is what the commit gate and the Claude Code plugin call. uv brings its own Python when the machine has none.

Requires Python 3.11 or newer and Git on PATH. The CLI has one runtime dependency, lizard>=1.24.0; a package mirror needs both distributions. Install into the environment you intend to use, then check crapkit --version. The pip install -e ".[dev]" under Development is a different thing: it adds the test extra, for people changing crapkit.

Python projects can install pip install "crapkit[py]" in their test environment to include pytest-cov and subprocess-capable coverage.py. A separate tool installation still needs the coverage plugin in the environment that runs the suite.

Analysis and scoring run locally and send no telemetry. Configured lane, mutation and alert commands run with your permissions and can contact services or change files. Review those commands before running Crapkit in a repository you do not trust (SECURITY.md).

$ crapkit --version
crapkit 0.7.6

python -m crapkit works identically to the console script and is what to use from a source checkout. Every subcommand accepts --repo PATH (default: the nearest crapkit.toml at or above the current directory, so a monorepo workspace finds the root's), and with it you never have to cd into the repo you are scoring; Subcommands shows where the flag goes.

Upgrading

Keep the CLI and plugin versions aligned, measure fresh coverage after upgrading, and review any ratchet identity refusal before reseeding. The current reader is analysis version 10; older JavaScript and TypeScript callback marks can require a reviewed mapping. Follow the upgrade guide for saved state, portable records and Windows launcher locks.

Upgrading from 0.4.4

This historical example describes the 0.4.4 to 0.4.5 transition, from analysis version 7 to 8. It is retained to explain older refusal messages:

$ crapkit verify
crapkit: ratchet marks were recorded under [crapkit-analysis=7 lizard=1.24.0] but this run measures [crapkit-analysis=8 lizard=1.24.0] — CRAP scores are not comparable across metric versions; re-baseline with `crapkit ratchet seed`

That transition changed cognitive complexity, not ccn or the CRAP formula. Later reader changes also affect function identity. Use the current upgrade guide when moving from any older release to today's reader.

The exe lock on Windows

An active MCP server can hold crapkit.exe open and make an upgrade fail with Windows error 32. Stop that server or its agent session, rerun the upgrade with the same installer, then restart the client. See the Windows upgrade procedure.

The Claude Code plugin

claude plugin marketplace add JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit
claude plugin install crapkit@crapkit

Two commands, installed once per user, and every repo on the machine gets it. The plugin ships three skills, the read-side MCP server, and one advisory PostToolUse hook that names any function an edit pushed over its ceiling. Claude reaches two of the skills by itself, crapkit and crapkit-recover; the third you type, as /crapkit:crapkit-onboard, because wiring a repo up happens once and its description has no business in every turn's window. It adds no files to your repo, and it needs the crapkit CLI on PATH.

A repo with no crapkit.toml costs a silent sub-50 ms no-op per edit. After upgrading the CLI, refresh the marketplace before updating the installed plugin:

claude plugin marketplace update crapkit
claude plugin update crapkit@crapkit --scope user
crapkit doctor --plugin-root

Restart existing Claude Code sessions to apply the plugin update. The check above compares installed files with the CLI on PATH; it does not reload a running session.

The hook registers on Edit|Write, which is every write that names a file. An agent that writes its source through a shell heredoc names none, so a Bash event is judged off the working tree instead. That half is yours to register, because it costs two git spawns per shell call. Add a second PostToolUse entry to your own settings, same command, matcher Bash:

{
  "hooks": {
    "PostToolUse": [
      {
        "matcher": "Bash",
        "hooks": [
          { "type": "command", "command": "crapkit claude-hook --protocol 1", "timeout": 20 }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}

The cost is one git rev-parse --show-toplevel and one git status --porcelain -z -uall per shell call in any git repo, whether or not crapkit measures it: about 30 ms together on crapkit's own checkout, and more on a bigger tree. What comes back is the dirty or untracked *.py files written in the last 12 seconds, 25 at most, each judged the way an edit is. Python only, so a TypeScript or Go repo pays the two spawns and hears nothing.

Codex

Codex can install the same marketplace's plugin through its own manager:

codex plugin marketplace add https://github.com/JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit.git
codex plugin add crapkit@crapkit

Use the three skills and MCP server in Codex. The advisory hook instructions above configure Claude Code's PostToolUse event. To refresh an existing Codex installation:

codex plugin marketplace upgrade crapkit
codex plugin add crapkit@crapkit
codex plugin list --marketplace crapkit --json

Check the installed Codex plugin with an explicit crapkit doctor --plugin-root PATH. See plugin upgrades for choosing that path and starting a fresh MCP session. A runtime with a skills directory but no compatible marketplace can copy plugin/skills/* instead; other MCP clients use the stdio setup.

Languages

14 languages, two coverage parsers. Coverage joins where a parser exists; everything else scores on complexity alone.

Language

Files

Coverage

Python

.py

coverage.py

TypeScript

.ts

istanbul

TSX

.tsx

istanbul

JavaScript

.js .jsx .mjs .cjs

istanbul

Vue

.vue

istanbul, when your vitest run reports on .vue files

Swift

.swift

none: cc-only

Go

.go

none: cc-only

Rust

.rs

none: cc-only

shell

.sh .bash

none: cc-only

PowerShell

.ps1 .psm1

none: cc-only

C and C++

.c .cc .cpp .cxx .h .hpp

none: cc-only

Objective-C

.m .mm

none: cc-only

Java

.java

none: cc-only

Zig

.zig

none: cc-only

A cc-only scope declares coverage_optional = true, scores crap = ccn, and needs no lane. Nothing about it is provisional: the ceiling still binds and the gate still refuses a function over it. Add a coverage lane the day a parser exists and the same scope starts joining coverage.

crapkit init writes that key itself, on every scope whose languages all lack a parser, and leaves it off any scope a lane could still measure. So the 60-second start above runs unchanged on a Go, Rust or shell repo: crapkit coverage scores it with no lane at all, and that run is the baseline worklist, next-item, ratchet seed and verify read.

Three readers are crapkit's own. lizard ships none for shell or PowerShell, so crapkit counts their functions itself. Its Rust reader scores a 7-arm match as ccn 2 (filed as lizard #494), so crapkit counts each non-wildcard arm like a C case and retires the override the day upstream fixes it. The cognitive column charges that same block once, the way Sonar charges a switch.

Expression arrows in arrays and argument lists are measured separately. In TypeScript, wrap an arrow body in parentheses when it contains < before a comma, such as x => (pair<T,U>(x)) or x => (x < 0). Without that delimiter, analysis refuses the file because this reader cannot distinguish type arguments from an expression separator. Generic arrow parameter declarations remain supported.

Functions on the same line have separate occurrence identifiers. Existing ratchet marks with ambiguous old identities require a reviewed mapping; see same-line function identity.

The gate

Use the advisory while editing, the gate when committing, and verify for the full verdict. The preview and hooks differ in what their available evidence can prove:

Surface

Fires

Power

crapkit claude-hook

after an agent's edit lands

advisory. Names the breach on stderr. Blocks nothing, because PostToolUse runs after the write

crapkit rescore FILE --gate

when you ask, after the first coverage run

preview. The commit gate's verdict on demand, sub-second, before you stage. With no run behind it, exit 1 and no snapshot

crapkit hook-precommit

git commit

blocks. The hook exits 6; git reports 1. Staged blobs only, so it costs the size of the commit and needs no coverage

crapkit verify

before you push, and in CI

the verdict. Gate, ratchet, new test failures, diff coverage, against the trusted baseline

Both hooks exempt a function the committed ratchet already carries a mark for, so touching signed debt never refuses a commit. verify is what fails a mark that rises. Since 0.4.5 its gate exempts a touched function whose fresh CRAP sits at or under its mark, the rule rescore --gate already applied; push it past the mark and the gate fires again. The pre-commit hook still exempts on the mark's existence alone, on purpose: a staged blob has no coverage, so there is no fresh CRAP to compare against. It reports each exemption count on stderr (staged function(s) carry a ratchet mark and were not gated), and says the same about a staged file no [[scope]] claims, so a new top-level directory cannot go ungated in silence.

The Crapkit root can sit below the Git top. A config in packages/api gates that package's staged files as project-relative paths such as app/m.py. Path and root rules also cover absolute arguments, literal filenames and Git diff settings.

Git runs hooks outside your shell's activated venv. Bare python must resolve to an interpreter that has crapkit installed, or spell it out (exec /path/to/venv/Scripts/python -m crapkit hook-precommit).

Route 1: .git/hooks/pre-commit (local, not committed)

cat > .git/hooks/pre-commit <<'EOF'
#!/bin/sh
exec python -m crapkit hook-precommit
EOF
chmod +x .git/hooks/pre-commit

The same file from PowerShell. Out-File and > write a byte-order mark (UTF-16 on 5.1) in front of the shebang, and git then answers every commit with cannot spawn .git/hooks/pre-commit and lets it through; Set-Content -Encoding ascii does not. Git runs the hook with its own sh, so the interpreter is spelled with forward slashes and quoted, and no chmod is needed on Windows:

$python = (Get-Command python).Source -replace '\\', '/'
Set-Content -Path .git/hooks/pre-commit -Encoding ascii -NoNewline -Value "#!/bin/sh`nexec '$python' -m crapkit hook-precommit`n"

crapkit doctor warns when the hook file git would spawn starts with a byte-order mark.

Route 2: a committed hooks directory

The whole route, from a repo that has no githooks/ yet:

mkdir -p githooks
cat > githooks/pre-commit <<'EOF'
#!/bin/sh
exec python -m crapkit hook-precommit
EOF
chmod +x githooks/pre-commit
printf 'githooks/pre-commit text eol=lf\n' >> .gitattributes
git add .gitattributes githooks/pre-commit
git update-index --chmod=+x githooks/pre-commit
git commit -m "add crapkit gate hook"
git config core.hooksPath githooks

The --chmod goes between the add and the commit. It writes the executable bit to the index, so a commit that already happened does not carry it: run it after and git ls-tree HEAD still says 100644, which is a hook Unix checkouts silently skip. The .gitattributes line is the harder half of the same failure: under Windows' default core.autocrlf the hook checks out CRLF and #!/bin/sh\r dies on Linux and macOS with a bad-interpreter error. crapkit doctor warns when a file under core.hooksPath is not 100755 in the index and prints the update-index line for it.

Git will not read a hooks path out of a committed file, so that git config line belongs in your CONTRIBUTING setup steps. Every clone arms the gate with it.

Route 3: the pre-commit framework

crapkit ships a .pre-commit-hooks.yaml declaring id: crapkit-gate. In your .pre-commit-config.yaml:

repos:
  - repo: https://github.com/JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit
    # crapkit's release step rewrites this line to the tag it just cut
    rev: v0.7.6
    hooks:
      - id: crapkit-gate

That file arms nothing on its own. The framework writes .git/hooks/pre-commit when you tell it to, and until then git commit runs no gate and says nothing:

pip install pre-commit
pre-commit install

pre-commit install is the line every clone needs, the way Route 2 needs its git config core.hooksPath line.

rev is a git ref pre-commit resolves against that remote. Pin a release tag, not a branch: pre-commit autoupdate only moves between tags, and a moving main would change your gate under you.

Route 4: CI

A CI job runs on a fresh clone, which has no .crapkit/ store, so bare crapkit verify exits 1. Running coverage first would make the PR's own tree the baseline, a gate that can never fail. The portable baseline is the mechanism:

# on the default branch, after a passing verify: commit this file
crapkit verify --emit-baseline crapkit-baseline.tsv

# in the PR job, against the committed baseline
crapkit verify --baseline-tsv crapkit-baseline.tsv --github

--github emits ::error file=... annotations that land on the PR diff; --sarif PATH writes SARIF 2.1.0 for code-scanning upload. Refresh the committed baseline whenever the default branch's verify passes.

Two things the job has to do before those lines run. Install crapkit, pip install crapkit, and pin the version the way Route 3 pins rev: an unpinned install moves your gate on whatever day a release lands. Fetch the whole history. actions/checkout clones one commit by default, verify reads the diff against the baseline's commit out of git, and a shallow clone does not have that commit:

$ crapkit verify --baseline-tsv crapkit-baseline.tsv
crapkit: baseline commit a74260f321f is not an ancestor of HEAD in this shallow clone, which does not hold it; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout or run git fetch --unshallow

That is exit 4 on a git clone --depth 1 of a repo whose baseline verifies at full depth. On a full clone the same exit blames what it used to, a rebase or an amend that rewrote history, and asks for a fresh baseline instead. Set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout step, which is what crapkit's own .github/workflows/ci.yml does.

The whole PR job, on GitHub Actions:

on: pull_request
jobs:
  crapkit:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0        # verify needs the baseline's commit
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with:
          python-version: "3.12"
      - run: pip install crapkit
      - run: pip install -e ".[dev]"   # your own test dependencies
      - run: crapkit verify --baseline-tsv crapkit-baseline.tsv --github

The second install is the one people leave out. verify reruns your lanes, so the job needs whatever your test command needs: the coverage plugin, npm ci, a database, all of it. Without them the lane writes no artifact and verify exits 5 quoting the runner's own error, which is a broken job and not a verdict.

What a refusal looks like

$ git commit -m "add route"
crapkit gate: 1 staged function(s) exceed the complexity ceiling of 6:
  ccn   7  app/m.py:9  route( a , b , c , d )
decompose before committing (coverage cannot save a function above the target).

That commit exited 1, not 6. Git collapses any failed hook to 1, so 6 is a code you only ever see by running the hook yourself: crapkit hook-precommit exits 6 on a violation and 0 otherwise. The stderr block above is the same either way.

CRAPKIT_OVERRIDE_REASON is not a bypass. Setting it routes the commit through the full three-record audit: an alert line through alert_command, a ratchet entry staged into the commit, and a row in the override log. All three land or nothing does, and an unset alert_command refuses the override outright. See docs/ratchet.md.

The GitHub Action

action.yml at this repository's root is a composite action, so a reviewer sees crapkit's numbers on the pull request without installing anything. Four lines add it to a workflow, and every input has a default:

      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0
      - uses: JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit@v0.7.6

The whole job those four lines sit in:

on: pull_request
jobs:
  crapkit:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      pull-requests: write             # the comment, and nothing else
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0               # the diff, and verify's baseline commit
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with:
          python-version: "3.12"       # the interpreter the install below lands in
      - run: pip install -e ".[dev]"   # whatever your lanes need to run
      - uses: JeanFrancoisGagne/crapkit@v0.7.6
        with:
          gate: "false"

That pip install step is the one people leave out, and it is the same one Route 4 above names: the action installs crapkit and nothing else, so your lanes still need whatever your test command needs. Without it the lane writes no artifact and the comment says so.

fetch-depth: 0 is the other one. actions/checkout clones a single commit; the action reads the pull request's changed files out of git and verify reads the diff against the baseline's commit. With a shallow clone the file list comes back empty and the comment ranks the whole repository instead of the diff.

The action installs crapkit from $GITHUB_ACTION_PATH, which is its own checkout of the ref you pinned in uses:. So a pin left at last month's tag scores your tree with last month's crapkit rather than with whatever released since, and pinning a tag is the whole version policy; the snippets above name the current release.

What the comment looks like

One comment per pull request, edited in place on every push. A hidden <!-- crapkit-action --> line is how the next run finds it, so a fifteen-push branch carries one comment and not fifteen. On a push event there is no pull request to carry it, and the same text goes to the job log instead.

Rendered from three saved payloads: a pull request that adds an untested route() (ccn 8) beside a ratchet-marked legacy_router(), in a repository whose diff_uncovered_max is 3. The payloads are under tests/fixtures/action_comment/, and the unit suite pins this block to their render:

<!-- crapkit-action -->

## crapkit

4 functions in 2 files, 2 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 149.59, grade F.

**verify failed, exit 6: complexity gate.**

- gate: `app/calc.py:34` `route( a , b , c , d )` ccn 8, cov 0%, crap 72.0 -> decompose
- uncovered lines in `app/calc.py`: 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45

Run 3 against baseline 1, 1 changed file: 1 gate violation, 0 ratchet regressions, 0 new test failures, 11 uncovered changed lines.

### Worklist: 1 changed file

| File | Function | ccn | risk | remedy |
|---|---|---:|---:|---|
| `app/calc.py:34` | `route( a , b , c , d )` | 8 | 4.0 | decompose |
| `app/calc.py:19` | `legacy_router( a , b , c , d , e )` | 8 | 4.0 | decompose (accepted debt) |

The first line is the run crapkit coverage wrote: functions and files, how many sit over the ceiling (over ceiling 6, or over their ceilings (6; reports 12, util 4) when scopes set their own), CRAP load and grade, with a failed lane's first error line appended as ; lane 'js' failed: .... When coverage --json died before a summary, the line quotes the error object it printed instead: `crapkit coverage` exited 5: lane 'py' cannot import pytest-cov; pip install pytest-cov.

The verdict opens with the exit code and the rule it stands for (complexity gate, ratchet regressions, new test failures, diff-coverage ceiling N), then one bullet per finding: each gate violation with its function, ccn, coverage, CRAP and remedy; each ratchet regression as recorded -> fresh; each new test failure by id; and the first twenty uncovered changed lines, one bullet per file, with a count of the rest. The counts line closes it. A verify that passed is one line: **verify passed.** Run 2 against baseline 1, 7 changed files.

The rows are the ranked worklist for the files the pull request changed, worst first, top of them, with the rows a finding names listed first. risk is ccn times churn weight, the number crapkit worklist ranks on, and remedy is the run's own verdict for that function: decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok. (accepted debt) marks a function the committed ratchet carries a mark for, so an untouched legacy_router does not read like the pull request's own new function. A pull request that touches no ranked function gets the heading and no table.

The two file counts describe the same diff, counted twice. 39 changed files is git diff --name-only base.sha...HEAD, the branch's own commits, and it is what the table is filtered to. The count on the verdict line is what verify measured from the same fork point. With delta: "false" the second one is 0, because there is nothing behind the checkout to measure from.

The inputs

Input

Default

What it does

gate

"false"

"true" exits with crapkit verify's own code, so a finding fails the check. On a pull request with delta on it also exits 1 when the base run was not made, because a verdict with no base run judged no changed function. Anything else exits 0 and the comment is the whole output

delta

"true"

scores the pull request's base commit first, so the verdict covers the commits the pull request adds. Costs a second lane run; "false" scores the checkout alone, and the verdict then judges no changed function

top

"5"

worklist rows rendered in the table

python-version

"3.12"

the interpreter actions/setup-python installs crapkit into. Match it to the version your own setup-python step named, or the lanes run on an interpreter your dependencies never reached

gate: "false" is the default on purpose. A team adopts the action before it has decided which findings should stop a merge, and a check that fails on day one gets turned off on day two.

What the verdict line covers

On a pull request, the commits the pull request adds. The action scores the fork point first, then the checkout, then runs crapkit verify --base <fork>, which measures the diff from there and takes the fork point's run as its baseline. So the gate judges the functions in the diff a reviewer is reading, and a repository that was already over its ceiling before the branch started does not fail every pull request that touches it.

The fork point is git merge-base of base.sha and HEAD, not base.sha itself. base.sha is the base branch's tip when the event fired, so a base branch that moved after the branch forked carries commits HEAD never saw, and a run there would be neither the baseline verify wants nor a diff anyone is reviewing.

The base run happens in a detached worktree under RUNNER_TEMP, and its store is copied over the checkout's so both runs sit in one place. The cost is two lane runs on a pull request: your suite runs once at the fork point and once on the checkout. Set delta: "false" to skip the base run, and the verdict falls back to the checkout against its own run, which reports the tree's own health and judges no changed function. The comment says so in place of verify passed:

**verify judged no changed function:** the base run was not made (no base commit). Run 2 against baseline 2, 0 changed files.

Three things leave the base run unmade: a shallow clone that does not hold the fork point, a fork point older than your crapkit.toml, and a lane that will not run against that tree. The step logs crapkit base scoring exited N and writes the reason to crapkit-base.reason in the words the comment then quotes, shallow clone does not hold the fork point of <sha>; set fetch-depth: 0 on the checkout, no usable crapkit.toml at the fork point <sha>: ..., or lane failed at the fork point <sha>: ... with the lane's first error line. The verdict falls back the same way delta: "false" does, and the ratchet still runs, so exit 7 there is a finding. What differs is the job's status. With gate: "true" on a pull request whose base run was attempted and not made, the exit step exits 1 and prints the reason, because actions/checkout's default depth-1 clone would otherwise turn every pull request into a green check that judged nothing. A push event and delta: "false" never attempt the base run, so they keep verify's own code; a push has no base commit and no pull request to comment on.

One requirement the base run adds: the lane has to measure the tree it runs in. A lane that reaches an installed copy of your package instead of the checkout will measure the pull request's code while standing on the base commit, and the two runs then describe the same tree. crapkit verify refuses a run whose artifact names files outside the tree (exit 5), which catches the loud version of this; a lane pinned to a path outside the worktree is the quiet one. Point the lane at the tree, or set delta: "false".

--reuse-artifacts is what keeps each of those runs to one pass of your suite. coverage ran the lanes moments earlier on that tree, and verify parses those artifacts rather than running the whole suite a second time for the same numbers.

Which is why crapkit coverage has to exit 0 for there to be a verdict. When it exits anything else (a lane that failed, an artifact it refused), the action does not run verify: on a runner that keeps its workspace between jobs (clean: false), a verify --reuse-artifacts over a failed measurement read the artifact the dead lane had left from an earlier run, passed over it, and made that run the trusted baseline. The comment then carries coverage's failure in place of the verdict:

**no verdict: `crapkit coverage` exited 5 (lane 'py' failed: lane 'py' wrote no artifact on its last attempt; the .crapkit/cov/py.json on disk predates it); verify did not run.**

The parenthesis is the first line of the lane failure the summary carries. When every lane failed, coverage prints no summary at all and the lane errors are only in the job log, and the line says so. With gate: "true" the job exits with coverage's code.

The other gate that judges a delta is the portable baseline in Route 4: commit crapkit-baseline.tsv on the default branch and run crapkit verify --baseline-tsv crapkit-baseline.tsv in a step of your own. It needs no second lane run, and it needs someone to keep that file current.

The comment is posted with gh api and the job's own GITHUB_TOKEN, which needs pull-requests: write. Two things it cannot do: a pull request from a fork gets a read-only token, so the POST is a 403 there, and a self-hosted runner without the gh CLI on PATH fails that step. Both leave the rendered text in the job log.

Subcommands

crapkit clean --dry-run --json previews policy-based cleanup. See resource policies for shared analysis workers, process lifetime, bounded logs and retained evidence.

Every subcommand takes --repo PATH, and the flag goes after the subcommand. Without it the root is the nearest crapkit.toml at or above the current directory (ADR 0002): from a monorepo workspace crapkit worklist reads the root configuration that claims the workspace, says crapkit: using crapkit.toml at /repo on stderr, and reads a relative path argument from where you stand. claude-hook is the one exception: it has no --repo, because it takes its root from the file named in the hook payload it reads.

$ crapkit worklist --repo /path/to/repo --scope util --top 1
worklist @ a7c5c85ac37 (run 1, floor ccn>=5, churn 12mo) - 1 of 3 active (--top 1), 0 dormant
  risk      5.4  ccn   5  crap    30.0  cov   0%    5c/1a  util/stats.py:1  bucket( value , low , high )

Before it, argparse reads the path as the subcommand name and exits 2 without ever mentioning --repo:

$ crapkit --repo /path/to/repo worklist --top 1
crapkit: error: argument command: invalid choice: '/path/to/repo' (choose from 'inventory', 'coverage', ...)

--json prints one sorted-keys JSON object on stdout, always carrying a schema field.

Command

What it does

clean [--dry-run] [--json]

Applies configured retention to recognized idle default test evidence and recovers abandoned temporary mutation worktrees. Preserves active runs, caller-managed output and intentional mutation pools. --dry-run reports planned removals.

init

Sniffs tracked source into per-directory scopes, writes a self-validated starter crapkit.toml whose lanes report into .crapkit/cov/, and appends .crapkit/ plus each runner's own droppings to .gitignore. Writes a live [[lane]] when it can detect the test runner, otherwise a commented template. Refuses to clobber an existing config.

doctor [--show-files] [--json] [--tune] [--plugin-root [PATH]]

Checks the config still describes the repo: unknown keys (with the accepted spellings), zero-file scopes, tracked source no scope claims, scopes no lane covers, lane cwds and commands that no longer resolve, lizard importable, oversized files. It reads each lane command with the shell that will run it, so a quoted interpreter path is one word and a runner after && is checked too, and it FAILs a lane whose runner does not resolve or that the shell cannot start, naming the word to change; a bare name is looked for on PATH and a runner spelled as a path is looked for under the directory the lane runs in, so .venv/bin/python answers the same from any directory you run doctor in; each distinct runner is probed once, not once per lane. It WARNs on a lane writing its artifact at the repo root, a coveragepy or istanbul lane with no results_artifact (the crashed-worker and no-new-failures checks are off for it, whichever runner the lane spells), a committed hook under core.hooksPath that is not executable in the index, a directory whose functions are all untested while its tests exist, and a scope a lane measures with no [crapkit.scoped_tests] template behind it, which is the loop's step 4 with nothing to run. --tune prints suggested parallelism knobs and writes nothing. --plugin-root PATH reads no repo at all: it checks an installed plugin against the crapkit on PATH (the bare name its hooks and MCP server spawn) on both version and hook --protocol, and FAILs when PATH carries no crapkit at all, one line per disagreement and silence when they agree; PATH is the plugin root or any directory above it, ~/.claude included (only manifests named crapkit count, and the newest install wins), and with no PATH it looks in Claude Code's plugin cache. A root it found rather than one you typed is named first, as crapkit doctor: checking PATH. See docs/agent-json.md.

inventory [--db PATH] [--export PATH] [--json]

One lizard pass over every in-scope file into a SQLite snapshot run, cached by content hash. --db is the only way to point crapkit at a store outside .crapkit/, and only this command accepts it.

coverage [--lane NAME] [--reuse-artifacts] [--reuse-unchanged] [--export PATH] [--sarif PATH] [--github] [--json]

Runs the lanes, joins branch coverage onto a fresh inventory, writes a scored run. A failed lane is recorded, not fatal: its scopes fall back to no-lane and the run is typed partial, so it can never serve as a baseline. See docs/lanes.md.

verify [--baseline ID | --base REF | --baseline-tsv PATH] [--emit-baseline PATH] [--override REASON] [--reuse-artifacts] [--reuse-unchanged] [--no-tighten] [--sarif PATH] [--github] [--json]

The full verdict against the trusted baseline: gate on touched functions, ratchet, no new test failures, optional diff-coverage ceiling. The three baseline selectors are mutually exclusive; --baseline ID also bypasses the taint rule (The trusted baseline), and --baseline-tsv reads a commit-stamped file so a fresh clone verifies with no store. --no-tighten passes the verdict without rewriting the ratchet. Findings a dirty tree produced are tagged dirty and counted apart. It reads each istanbul artifact once for coverage, dead lines and its digest, and skips the artifact walk on an empty diff; skipping the whole run on an unchanged tree was measured and rejected, because a key made of HEAD plus the dirty names cannot see a second edit to a file that was already dirty.

worklist [--top N] [--scope NAME] [--batches N] [--json]

The risk map: every admitted function ranked by ccn * churn weight, floored by worklist_floor, with hot simple code and anything over its ceiling admitted past that floor. It ranks finished rows and no-lane rows too, marked ok and no-lane, so it never empties; next-item carries the stop condition. Every row carries the function's crap and cov off the ranked run and its ratchet_mark when the committed marks file signs for it, and the header counts the active rows the cap hid: 50 of 3980 active (worklist_top 50). --scope NAME (repeatable) is exact, not a substring; a name no [[scope]] declares is a configuration error, exit 3, naming the declared scopes. --batches N adds a batches[] view cutting the active list into at most N file-disjoint batches with co-changing files kept together, off the same cached pairs coupling reads; the normal keys stay.

next-item [--top N] [--exclude FRAG] [--scope NAME] [--claim]

The actionable queue as JSON, with churn, budget estimates and uncovered lines. Same run and same admission floor as worklist, a different view of it: no-lane rows are skipped and counted in skipped_no_lane, and what is left is ranked by crap descending rather than by risk, so the item it hands out is often not the worklist's first row. --exclude FRAG (repeatable) skips items whose path or function name contains FRAG; --scope NAME (repeatable) is exact, not a substring, and a name no [[scope]] declares is a configuration error, exit 3, naming the declared scopes. --claim holds what it hands out so a second session skips it. stale is true when the ranked run's commit is not HEAD, the same field worklist carries. Every item carries a handle: the bare identifier, or (anonymous)#N for a function with no name, which is the name form that survives the edit the item asks for.

claims [list | release PATH NAME | release --all] [--json]

The open claims, and the way to hand one back without waiting for a verify. release takes the bare identifier, the whole long name, or the handle the claim was taken under, which is the only one that picks out a single (anonymous) claim.

brief FILE NAME [--batch N] [--json]

The start-editing packet for one function: its own source text, every function in the file, the scored row and the scope ceiling, the ratchet mark and what the gate will bind on, uncovered lines, duplication twins, file churn, coupling partners, the config's notes, and the literal commands for the rest of the loop. Plus handle, remedy and the same est_splits / est_uncovered_paths the queue prints, and a commands.refresh that writes a run (refresh_writes_run) rather than re-reading the stale one. NAME takes the bare identifier, the long name next-item printed, the function's start line, (anonymous)#N for a function printed (anonymous) counting the file's anonymous functions from the top, or NAME#2 for the second of several functions a file gives one name to. --batch N drops the positionals and emits packets[] instead: the top N of the queue, built from one read of the store and one duplication pass over the snapshot for the whole batch (batch of 5: 11.8 s to 5.2 s, output byte-identical to five separate calls).

explain FILE NAME [--history] [--tests] [--json]

A function's score across runs plus its mark. NAME resolves exact first: a function whose bare identifier or long name is exactly NAME wins, and only when nothing matches exactly does it fall back to a prefix match, so route explains route rather than every route_* beside it. It also takes the function's start line, the form brief takes, which is how you open one printed (anonymous). --history adds the commits that touched it (git log -L), each carrying its message body, --tests the tests that covered it, which needs coverage.py contexts turned on (recipe). --json emits the same content as one schema 1 object.

rescore FILE ... [--gate] [--json]

Fresh complexity for named files over the latest run's stale coverage, joined by name. Advisory: it writes no run. --gate applies the pre-commit hook's policy to the same selection the hook uses (functions the tree changed since HEAD), minus functions whose CRAP sits at or under their ratchet mark, and exits 6. A marked function past its mark is gated; the pre-commit hook exempts on the mark's existence instead, because a staged blob has no coverage to score.

ratchet seed | prune | merge | move | report [--enforce] [--json]

The mark lifecycle: seed new debt, prune gone code (a mark whose file git renamed follows it), merge as a git driver, move re-paths marks, report reads burn-down from the file's own git history. See docs/ratchet.md.

runs [list | prune [--keep N]] [--json]

Run history, and retention. list marks the run verify compares against today baseline, and prints verdict=- for a run that produces no verdict rather than one that failed. See The trusted baseline. --keep (default 5) is a floor on the newest trusted runs, not a cap: the digest pair, every passing verify baseline, every run an override names, and the newest non-hook run are kept too. prune VACUUMs afterwards.

overrides [--json]

The override audit trail: who granted what, when, and why.

trend [--json]

Totals per trusted run: functions, over-target count, CRAP load, average, per-scope rollup. It reads a per-run rollup table rather than rescanning every scored row, and fills that table for any run missing one, so it writes to the store (best effort: a read-only .crapkit/ costs the speed, not the command).

digest [--alert]

The delta between the two newest runs with identical lane sets. Silent when nothing changed. --alert pipes the body to alert_command on stdin. Plain lines, never JSON.

report [--out PATH]

One self-contained HTML page written to .crapkit/report.html (or --out PATH, repo-relative, or an absolute path you name), with the path printed on stdout. It renders what worklist --json and trend --json already answer at their defaults: the ranked worklist capped at worklist_top, the per-scope grades off the newest run, the trend series, and a banner naming every stale lane. It measures nothing and opens no network connection. Every row carries the function's CRAP and coverage, and prints the crapkit explain call for the rest: dark lines, history, the mark. It reads the same per-run rollups trend does, and writes them on the same terms.

duplication [--min-lines N] [--similarity F] [--top N] [--json]

Near-duplicate functions by normalized line shingles with containment scoring. Defaults: --min-lines 8, --similarity 0.8, --top 50. Ties have a stable order across hash seeds. A positive --top bounds retained candidates and output; dense inputs still require pair comparisons. A function and its nested closure never pair.

coupling [--min-support N] [--min-confidence F] [--top N] [--json]

File pairs that keep landing in the same commits. Defaults: --min-support 5 shared commits, --min-confidence 0.5 max-direction ratio, --top 50. Bulk commits never couple pairs, and a young repo returns nothing at the default support. The ranked pairs are cached in .crapkit/coupling-cache-v1.json, keyed on HEAD, the churn window, today's UTC date, the path format and a digest of the tracked set, and shared with brief and worklist --batches (warm: 1.05 s to 0.11 s on a 72k-commit repo). The date is part of that key, so the first run after midnight UTC rebuilds the pairs on an unchanged HEAD. --top reads the cache, because it truncates that same order; --min-support or --min-confidence off their defaults ask a wider question than the file answers, so they bypass it and recompute.

mutate [--files F ...] [--max-mutants N] [--drop-pool] [--json]

Diff-scoped mutation testing: flips comparisons, boundary shifts, boolean connectives and boolean literals on changed lines, runs mutation_command per mutant, lists survivors. --files replaces diff scope with the whole file. Both lists pass through the scored corpus first, the same predicate coverage uses (scopes, excludes, the test-file cut, max_file_bytes): a test file, an excluded path, a file over max_file_bytes or a file no scope claims is named on stderr and never mutated, --json lists it under outside_corpus, and when nothing is left stdout says nothing to mutate at exit 0 without starting the suite. --max-mutants (default 100) caps the run and the cap warning goes to stderr only, so mutants in --json is the capped count. Shell and PowerShell files are refused by name on stderr rather than mutated: < and > are redirections there, not comparisons. Every worker uses a kept worktree, including one; see mutation worktrees. --drop-pool removes them and exits.

test-scoped FILE ...

Runs each owning scope's [crapkit.scoped_tests] template on the files (quoted, longest-prefix scope wins). A template with no {files} runs as written, which is how a scope whose tests live outside its own paths runs its whole suite. Exit code only; a nonzero runner exits 1.

hook-precommit

The cc-only gate on staged blobs. No coverage, no snapshot, no repo-wide cache. Exit 6 on a violation.

claude-hook [--protocol N]

Reads one Claude Code PostToolUse payload from stdin and judges the file it edited: ccn against the scope ceiling, on functions the edit changed, minus functions a ratchet mark already covers. Advisory only: the edit has landed, and hook-precommit stays the enforcement point. Exit 2 and an advisory on stderr is the only thing it ever says, one block per judged file (a head line, one line per breaching function, a closing line): no crapkit.toml above the edited file, an unscoped file, mid-rebase or mid-merge, a --protocol other than 1, source that parses to no functions, or any internal failure all exit 0 in silence. The root is the first crapkit.toml above the edited file; the walk stops at a .git entry, so a worktree never borrows its parent's config. A Bash event names no file, so it judges the working tree instead: the dirty or untracked *.py files touched in the last 12 seconds, 25 at most, each through the same ladder, and silence for a clean tree or a cwd outside any repo. That half fires only where you register a Bash matcher (The Claude Code plugin). It opens no snapshot and writes nothing.

watch [--interval SECONDS] [--cycles N]

Rescores tracked files as they change (mtime polling, default 2s, subprocess-isolated so a half-saved syntax error never kills the watcher). --cycles N polls exactly N times and exits 0; without it the loop runs until ctrl-c.

help [TOPIC]

The help git, npm and docker answer to. With no TOPIC it prints the command list; with one it prints that subcommand's own help, the same page as crapkit TOPIC --help. A TOPIC that names no subcommand exits 3.

mcp

A stdio MCP server with no extra dependency, exposing twelve read-side tools named verb_noun, each with a title and output schema. Tools call the CLI to inspect current scores, source and edited-file gates. They take no claims and run no verification; calls can write caches or store metadata. See the MCP contract and setup.

Reading the output

Flags: why a coverage number is missing

Flag

Meaning

Scored

measured

A lane artifact spoke about this function.

Real cov.

untested

A lane covers the scope, but its artifact is silent on this function, which normally means no test imports the file.

cov = 0. A testing gap, and uncovered_lines comes back null because no artifact can name lines it never saw.

no-lane

No lane's scopes list names this function's scope.

cov = 0. A tooling gap, not a testing gap. next-item never hands one out and counts them in skipped_no_lane; worklist ranks them and marks the row no-lane, because a wiring gap is a risk you have to see.

cc-only

The scope sets coverage_optional = true, so no coverage number can exist.

crap = ccn, and remedy can only be ok or decompose. uncovered_lines comes back null with a note naming that setting.

The coverage summary counts all four as measured / untested / no_lane / cc_only.

Remedy: what to do about it

Remedy

Condition

Action

decompose

ccn > ceiling

Split it. No amount of coverage clears this.

split-lines

ccn <= ceiling, crap > ceiling, and another function shares its source lines

Put each definition on its own lines, then measure again. Coverage cannot tell functions on one line apart, so the score stays at uncovered whatever the tests do.

add-tests

ccn <= ceiling and crap > ceiling

Cover the branches.

ok

crap <= ceiling

Nothing.

Grade and CRAP load

The grade is the share of functions over their ceiling: A+ at exactly zero, A under 2%, B under 5%, C under 10%, D under 20%, F at 20% or more. crap_load beside it is the plain sum of every function's CRAP score, so it moves when a function gets better even if the letter does not.

Risk: what ranks the worklist

risk = ccn * churn weight. The weight is a time-weighted sum over the file's commits in the churn window: each commit contributes a logistic weight rising to 0.5 for the newest commit in the log and falling to near zero for the oldest, so five edits last month outrank fifty from two years ago. The window anchors on the newest commit, never on the wall clock, so a fixed tree ranks identically forever.

Age is not the input, position in the log is. A log whose commits all share one timestamp has no range to weight against, so each commit counts once: a one-commit repo weighs every file 1.0, ranks by ccn, and promotes nothing under the floor, because a top 10% of equal weights would be every file. Commits minutes apart already rank. This repo was eight commits old, all made the same day:

$ crapkit worklist --scope util
worklist @ a7c5c85ac37 (run 1, floor ccn>=5, churn 12mo) - 3 of 3 active (worklist_top 50), 0 dormant
  risk      5.4  ccn   5  crap    30.0  cov   0%    5c/1a  util/stats.py:1  bucket( value , low , high )
  risk      4.5  ccn   9  crap    90.0  cov   0%    1c/1a  util/curve.py:1  curve( scores , mode , floor , ceiling , skip_none )
  risk      4.3  ccn   4  crap     4.2  cov  75%    5c/1a  util/stats.py:13  spread( values , cap )  ok

bucket at ccn 5 outranks curve at ccn 9 because five commits touched it and one touched curve. That is the whole point of weighting by churn. spread carries the ok marker: already at or under its ceiling, listed anyway, and next-item would not hand it out.

The list splits in two: active (files with commits in the window) and dormant (zero churn, kept out of the queue but counted). Two rules reach under the worklist_floor. A file whose churn weight sits in the top 10% is promoted down to ccn 3, which is why spread appears above at ccn 4. And a function over its ceiling is admitted whatever its ccn, so the floor can never hold back debt.

The trusted baseline

Every verify measures the working tree against one earlier run, the trusted baseline. crapkit runs list marks which one that is today.

Which runs qualify. A coverage run, or a verify that passed. A failed verify never qualifies, and neither does a partial run (a lane failed, so some scope fell back to no-lane) nor a hook override record, which carries no scored rows at all. In runs list, verdict=- marks a run that produces no verdict rather than one that failed: only verify renders a verdict. Four readers ask this one question and get this one answer: the baseline pick here, ratchet seed, prune, and the tighten damping that compares a mark against the same commit's previous run. A mark can no longer be signed off a run verify refused.

What advances it. Any qualifying run. coverage writes one wherever HEAD is, so a dashboard cron advances the baseline exactly as CI does. A passing verify advances it and tightens the ratchet on the way.

The taint rule. A failed verify recorded findings against a tree. Until some verify passes, runs made after that failure do not become the baseline: choosing one would move the comparison point past the findings, the flagged function would stop counting as touched, and nothing would look at it again. verify says which run it refused and falls back to the newest run in front of the failure.

$ crapkit runs list
run   1 @ 88012a148f6 2026-08-23T09:27:46Z coverage  verdict=-      lanes=py  baseline
run   2 @ 803bdde8556 2026-08-23T09:27:53Z verify    verdict=FAILED lanes=py
run   3 @ 803bdde8556 2026-08-23T09:28:02Z coverage  verdict=-      lanes=py

$ crapkit verify
warning: run 3 is not the baseline: verify run 2 FAILED with 1 finding(s) and no passing verify has cleared it since — measuring against run 1 @ 88012a148f6 instead, so those findings stay visible. Fix them, or pass `--baseline 3` to accept the newer run deliberately.
verify FAILED @ d89068de7f3 vs baseline 88012a148f6 (2 changed files)
  GATE  crap     72.0  ccn   8 cov 0%  calc/legacy.py:7  legacy_router( a , b , c , d , e )  -> decompose
  findings: 1 committed / 0 dirty (uncommitted edits and untracked files)

Run 3 is a coverage run somebody took on the tree run 2 refused, and it scores the same ccn-8 function. Without the rule it would have become the baseline, legacy_router would have stopped being a touched function, and that gate line would never print again.

The escape, twice. Fix the findings and let a verify pass, which clears the taint for good. Or accept the newer run on purpose with verify --baseline 3: an explicit id bypasses the rule, and the run history records which run the verdict used. Nothing here touches a repo that has never run verify: with no failure to protect, coverage alone always advances the baseline.

When the id you pass cannot serve. A --baseline ID naming a real run that is not a candidate says which run it is, why, and which ones can:

$ crapkit verify --baseline 3
crapkit: run 3 is an inventory run (no coverage was measured) and cannot serve as a baseline; trusted runs: 1, 2; pass `--baseline 2` for the newest

Exit codes

Code

Meaning

0

OK. For verify and hook-precommit: the gate passed.

1

Overloaded. Three unrelated things, listed below the table.

2

Usage error from argparse: unknown flag, missing positional. Raised before crapkit's own error handling.

3

Config error: crapkit.toml missing or unparseable, an unknown language or parser, a lane command the shell that runs it reads as a narrowed suite, a ratchet metric-stamp mismatch (Upgrading from 0.4.4), a test-scoped file under no scope or under a scope with no template.

4

Git error: not a repository, a baseline commit rewritten out of the history.

5

Tool error: lizard not importable, a lane that produced no artifact, one that measured a different tree, one that measured this tree and reported it in absolute paths (the join is root-relative, so those match nothing either; the refusal names the runner's own switch, relative_files = true under [tool.coverage.run] for a coveragepy lane, the reporter's cwd/root option for an istanbul one), a lane that timed out past its retries, an override alert command that failed. A timeout_seconds kills the whole process tree, so no orphan suite keeps running behind the failure.

6

Gate violation. A function the diff touched is over its ceiling and past any ratchet mark it carries: an edit that leaves a marked function at or under its mark is the debt the repo signed for and is exempt. Also rescore --gate, which applies the same rule, and hook-precommit, which exempts on the mark's existence instead.

7

Ratchet regression the diff never touched. A marked function scores worse than its recorded high-water mark; a touched one past its mark reports 6.

8

New test failures against the baseline run. Failures the baseline already had do not count.

9

Diff-coverage ceiling breached: diff_uncovered_max is set and more changed lines than that never ran.

Exit 1 means one of three things

CI cannot tell a crash from a clean policy verdict on the code alone. Which one you got depends on the command:

Command

What exit 1 means

doctor

A FAIL finding. This is a verdict, not a crash. A WARN (an unmeasured directory, or a lane writing its artifact at the repo root) and a note (a file over max_file_bytes, or no lanes declared) both exit 0.

ratchet report --enforce

The debt policy was breached. Also a verdict.

anything else

An unexpected error: "no snapshot yet, run crapkit coverage first", a brief name that matches no function, a test-scoped runner that exited non-zero.

verify reports the first of 6, 7, 8, 9 that fires, in that order. A gate violation and a ratchet regression together report 6. A run that takes any of them fails, so it neither advances the baseline nor tightens the ratchet, exit 9 included.

Quickstart: Python

A repo with calc/grade.py, tests/test_grade.py, and a pyproject.toml. Commit first; crapkit reads git ls-files. Install the coverage plugin first, because the lane init writes runs pytest --cov and those flags come from pytest-cov:

pip install pytest-cov

(pip install "crapkit[py]" pulls both at once when crapkit shares the suite's venv.)

If your suite drives its own CLI through subprocess.run, add [tool.coverage.run] patch = ["subprocess"] to pyproject.toml and keep coverage>=7.10.6: pytest-cov 7.0.0 dropped subprocess measurement, so without that key every entry point scores 0% and nothing warns. docs/lanes.md has the whole rule.

1. Scaffold the config

$ crapkit init
wrote crapkit.toml with 1 scope(s): calc
detected 1 lane(s) from this repo's own files: py - next: run `crapkit coverage`
added to .gitignore: .crapkit/, .coverage, __pycache__/

init sniffs tracked source into one scope per top-level source directory, and detects a coverage lane from what the repo already has: a pytest marker file (pyproject.toml, pytest.ini, setup.cfg) writes a live [[lane]], and so does a test script or vitest/jest in package.json. A lockfile beside them names the environment: uv.lock, poetry.lock, pdm.lock or Pipfile.lock makes the lane uv run python -m pytest … (and the matching run for the rest), because a bare python binds to whichever venv the shell has active rather than the one the repo pins — see The interpreter a lane binds to. Whatever it detects, it also leaves commented templates for the runners it did not find, and those carry the same launcher, so uncommenting one cannot hand the bare python back. Every lane it writes reports into .crapkit/cov/, which is why the .gitignore list is so short: see Where artifacts live.

[crapkit]
target = 6

[[scope]]
name = "calc"
paths = ["calc"]
languages = ["python"]

[exclude]
# A leading **/ matches zero or more directories, so each glob below reaches the
# repo root and every nested copy. Test directories leave the corpus on their own.
globs = [
  "**/node_modules/**",
  "**/dist/**",
  "**/build/**",
  "**/vendor/**",
  "**/generated/**",
  "**/__generated__/**",
  "**/*.generated.*",
  "**/*.test.*",
  "**/*.spec.*",
  "**/test_*.py",
  "**/*_test.py",
  "**/conftest.py",
  "**/*_test.go",
  "**/*.config.ts",
  "**/*.config.js",
  "**/*.config.mts",
]

[[lane]]
name = "py"
command = "python -m pytest --cov --cov-branch --cov-report=json:.crapkit/cov/py.json --junitxml=.crapkit/cov/junit-py.xml --continue-on-collection-errors"
artifact = ".crapkit/cov/py.json"
results_artifact = ".crapkit/cov/junit-py.xml"
parser = "coveragepy"
scopes = ["calc"]

# Declare one [[lane]] per coverage command, then run `crapkit coverage`.
# [[lane]]
# name = "js"
# command = "npx vitest run --coverage --coverage.reportsDirectory=.crapkit/cov/js --coverage.reportOnFailure --reporter=default --reporter=junit --outputFile=.crapkit/cov/js/junit.xml"
# artifact = ".crapkit/cov/js/coverage-final.json"
# results_artifact = ".crapkit/cov/js/junit.xml"
# parser = "istanbul"
# scopes = ["<your-scope>"]

# `crapkit test-scoped FILES` runs one command per scope, with {files}
# replaced by that scope's files, each quoted; a template with no {files}
# runs as written, which is how a scope whose tests live elsewhere runs them.
[crapkit.scoped_tests]
# calc: no test file under calc/, so the whole suite runs, from tests/
calc = "python -m pytest tests -q -p no:cacheprovider"

The last block is the one an agent loop needs. crapkit test-scoped exits 3 for a file whose scope declares no template, and AGENTS.md makes it step 4 of the burn-down loop. Every key is in docs/configuration.md.

2. Check the config against the repo

$ crapkit doctor
ok   config keys all recognized
ok   scope 'calc': 1 file
ok   every tracked source file belongs to a scope
ok   1 lane(s) declared
ok   lane 'py': python -> /home/you/ledger/.venv/bin/python (pytest 8.3.3, pytest-cov 7.1.0)
ok   lizard 1.24.0
doctor: no problems found

doctor prints one line per check and exits 1 only on a FAIL. WARN and note report and exit 0.

3. Score the repo, and read the queue

$ crapkit coverage
run 1 @ fae4db93108: 2 functions scored: 2 measured, 1 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 41.0, grade F
-> next: crapkit worklist

$ crapkit worklist
worklist @ fae4db93108 (run 1, floor ccn>=5, churn 12mo) - 1 of 1 active (worklist_top 50), 0 dormant
  risk     14.0  ccn  14  crap    38.5  cov  50%    1c/1a  calc/grade.py:7  classify( score , attempts , late , bonus )

Columns: risk, ccn, the function's crap and cov off the ranked run (- on an inventory-only run), <commits>c/<authors>a in the churn window, path:line, the function's long name, then a marker on rows the burn-down queue will not hand out (ok, no-lane). The header counts the active rows against their total, so 50 of 3980 active (worklist_top 50) says what the cap hid, and reads (--top N) when the flag set the cap. --json also carries ccn_std, weight and ratchet_mark.

worklist is the risk map, not a to-do list. It ranks finished rows too, so it does not empty when the burn-down does. next-item is the other view of that run: it drops the no-lane rows, ranks by crap, and its empty: true is the stop condition.

4. Take the top item

$ crapkit next-item
{"commit": "fae4db93108b4841a00959f9117430679e7250ca", "empty": false, "item": {"authors": 1, "ccn": 14, "ccn_std": 14, "cognitive": 13, "commits": 1, "cov": 0.5, "crap": 38.5, "end": 28, "est_splits": 3, "est_uncovered_paths": 7, "flag": "measured", "function": "classify( score , attempts , late , bonus )", "handle": "classify", "nesting": 3, "nloc": 22, "path": "calc/grade.py", "remedy": "decompose", "scope": "calc", "start": 7, "target": 6, "uncovered_lines": [9, 11, 15, 17, 19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]}, "run_id": 1, "schema": 1, "skipped_no_lane": 0, "stale": false}

remedy: "decompose", est_splits: 3 (this needs roughly three pieces to fit under 6), and uncovered_lines naming the ten lines no test walks. handle is the name form to pass back, and stale: false says the run still describes HEAD. Every field is in docs/agent-json.md.

5. Seed the ratchet

Arm the debt gate before fixing anything. ratchet seed records every over-target function at its current score, and from then on nothing may get worse.

$ crapkit ratchet seed
crapkit-ratchet.tsv: added 1, tightened 0 - 1 mark(s) vs run 1 (fae4db93108)

$ git add crapkit.toml crapkit-ratchet.tsv .gitignore && git commit -m "adopt crapkit"

6. Fix it and verify

Extract until every piece sits at or under the ceiling. Here classify became _validate, _adjusted, _band and a classify that only sequences them, with the table of cases pushed into parametrized tests. Commit the fix, then:

$ crapkit verify
verify OK @ 8d10c13303d vs baseline fae4db93108 (5 changed files)

$ crapkit coverage
run 3 @ 8d10c13303d: 5 functions scored: 5 measured, 0 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 19.0, grade A+
-> next: crapkit worklist

CRAP load 41.0 to 19.0, grade F to A+. verify reruns the lanes and checks three things against the trusted baseline: every function the diff touched sits at or under its ceiling, no marked function got worse, and no test that passed in the baseline fails now. Exit 0 advances the baseline and tightens crapkit-ratchet.tsv in place, so the repaid mark leaves the file: follow up with git commit -am "ratchet: classify repaid". The full mark lifecycle is in docs/ratchet.md.

crapkit next-item now comes back empty: true with a reasons object saying which ending you got. That is most of the stop condition, not all of it: AGENTS.md states the whole rule and reads the rest of reasons.

Quickstart: TypeScript

A vitest repo with src/grade.ts and test/grade.test.ts.

1. Scaffold the config

$ crapkit init
wrote crapkit.toml with 1 scope(s): src
detected 1 lane(s) from this repo's own files: js - next: run `crapkit coverage`
added to .gitignore: .crapkit/

The lane init wrote is npm run test -- --coverage --coverage.reportsDirectory=.crapkit/cov/js --coverage.reportOnFailure --reporter=default --reporter=junit --outputFile=.crapkit/cov/js/junit.xml. It reads vitest's json reporter from .crapkit/cov/js/coverage-final.json; the reportsDirectory flag is what keeps that report out of your root. The junit half is the lane's results_artifact, which the crashed-worker and no-new-failures checks read; both reporters are named because --reporter=junit alone would replace the console output you watch the suite through. Anything that produces an istanbul coverage-final.json works; see docs/lanes.md for the jest and pytest recipes, a package one directory down, and a crapkit root below the repo top.

2. Install a coverage provider

This is the step that stops most TypeScript users. vitest ships no coverage provider by default. Without one, init and doctor are both happy and coverage dies with exit 5:

$ crapkit coverage
crapkit: lane 'js' FAILED: lane 'js' produced no artifact at .crapkit/cov/js/coverage-final.json (command exit 1); lane log: /repo/.crapkit/lane-js.log; last output: $ npm run test -- --coverage --coverage.reportsDirectory=.crapkit/cov/js --coverage.reportOnFailure --reporter=default --reporter=junit --outputFile=.crapkit/cov/js/junit.xml

 MISSING DEPENDENCY  Cannot find dependency '@vitest/coverage-v8'

(exit 1)
crapkit: every lane failed (1 of 1); the errors are above

That failure writes no run. Every lane failed, so coverage exits before it opens a store: there is no .crapkit/crap.sqlite yet and the run ids below still start at 1.

Install the provider, and pin the major yourself. Unpinned, npm resolves the newest provider against your older vitest and refuses the tree:

npm i -D "@vitest/coverage-v8@<your vitest major>"

Question

Answer

Which provider?

Either works. @vitest/coverage-v8 is vitest's default and needs no config. @vitest/coverage-istanbul also works and needs coverage.provider = "istanbul" in your vitest config.

Which crapkit parser?

Both feed parser = "istanbul". The provider name and the parser name are unrelated: v8 output is remapped to the istanbul JSON schema before it is written.

Which version?

The provider's major has to match vitest's. On vitest 2 that is npm i -D "@vitest/coverage-v8@2", on vitest 3 npm i -D "@vitest/coverage-v8@3". Drop the pin and npm answers ERESOLVE unable to resolve dependency tree, naming the peer it could not satisfy.

The artifact crapkit wants is coverage-final.json, written by vitest's json coverage reporter, which is on by default. If your vitest config sets coverage.reporter explicitly, keep "json" in the list.

vitest writes no coverage report at all when the run fails. The lane init wrote already carries --coverage.reportOnFailure, so a red test still produces the artifact. If you write the lane by hand, or you would rather keep the switch beside your other coverage settings, coverage.reportOnFailure = true in the vitest config does the same job; either one is enough. The full block is in docs/lanes.md.

3. Score the repo

$ crapkit coverage
run 1 @ 8bfbe613fcd: 2 functions scored: 2 measured, 1 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 56.68, grade F
-> next: crapkit worklist

$ crapkit worklist
worklist @ 8bfbe613fcd (run 1, floor ccn>=5, churn 12mo) - 1 of 1 active (worklist_top 50), 0 dormant
  risk     15.0  ccn  15  crap    52.4  cov  45%    1c/1a  src/grade.ts:8  classify ( row Row )

classify is ccn 15 against a ceiling of 6: one function holding the late-and-retry penalty, the letter bands, the demotion rule and the null case.

4. Seed the ratchet and commit

ratchet seed records every over-target function at the score it has today, so nothing can get worse while you burn this one down.

$ crapkit ratchet seed
crapkit-ratchet.tsv: added 1, tightened 0 - 1 mark(s) vs run 1 (8bfbe613fcd)

$ git add crapkit.toml crapkit-ratchet.tsv .gitignore && git commit -m "adopt crapkit"

5. Fix it

Above the ceiling, coverage cannot help, so classify gets split rather than tested. penalty, band and demote come out as their own exported functions, and classify keeps the null case and the bonus:

export function classify(row: Row): string {
  if (row.score === null) {
    return "N/A";
  }
  let score = row.score - penalty(row.attempts, row.late);
  if (row.bonus && score < 90) {
    score += 3;
  }
  return demote(band(score), row);
}

rescore --gate judges that edit on complexity alone, before the slow step:

$ crapkit rescore src/grade.ts --gate
rescore vs run 1 @ 8bfbe613fcd (coverage STALE, complexity fresh)
   ccn   cov     crap  remedy      function
     5    0%     30.0  add-tests   src/grade.ts:22  band ( score )
     5    0%     30.0  add-tests   src/grade.ts:38  demote ( letter , row Row )
     4    0%     20.0  add-tests   src/grade.ts:8  penalty ( attempts , late )
     4   45%      6.7  add-tests   src/grade.ts:48  classify ( row Row )
     4   75%      4.2  ok          src/grade.ts:59  average ( scores Array )

Exit 0: every piece is at or under 6. The crap column is loud because its coverage half is still run 1's, from before three of those functions existed, and add-tests is the literal instruction for step 6.

6. Cover the new pieces

rescore --gate passed on complexity, not on coverage. penalty, band and demote are three functions no test has ever called, so each gets a table test:

describe("band", () => {
  it.each([[95, "A"], [85, "B"], [75, "C"], [65, "D"], [10, "F"]])(
    "scores %i as %s", (score, expected) => expect(band(score)).toBe(expected));
});

Run the suite once before the slow step:

$ npx vitest run
 Test Files  1 passed (1)
      Tests  21 passed (21)

Skip this step and step 7 fails rather than passes. Run on a copy of this repo with step 6 left out, verify reruns the lanes against the real tree and three functions the old suite never called come back over the ceiling:

$ crapkit verify
verify FAILED @ 0296156ff21 vs baseline 0e646697946 (1 changed files)
  GATE  crap     17.8  ccn   5 cov 20%  src/grade.ts:38  demote ( letter , row Row )  -> add-tests
  GATE  crap     12.4  ccn   5 cov 33%  src/grade.ts:22  band ( score )  -> add-tests
  GATE  crap     10.8  ccn   4 cov 25%  src/grade.ts:8  penalty ( attempts , late )  -> add-tests

7. Verify

$ crapkit verify
verify OK @ 2af3433d979 vs baseline 8bfbe613fcd (3 changed files)

$ crapkit coverage
run 3 @ 2af3433d979: 5 functions scored: 5 measured, 0 over ceiling 6, CRAP load 22.0, grade A+
-> next: crapkit worklist

CRAP load 56.68 to 22.0, grade F to A+, and the mark seeded in step 4 is gone: verify dropped it once classify scored under the ceiling, rewriting the tracked crapkit-ratchet.tsv in place. Commit it with your change. Marks only ever fall.

A verify may also print warning: N changed line(s) have no coverage above its verdict; that block is advisory unless diff_uncovered_max is set (docs/configuration.md). It prints warning: N function(s) over the ceiling carry no ratchet mark when the tree holds debt ratchet seed never signed: the gate judges touched functions only and the ratchet check compares marks only, so coverage loss on such a function would pass unseen. The count is unmarked_over_target in --json, fires no exit code, and is zero on a repo with no debt.

Documentation

Page

Covers

The handbook

Start here for anything deeper. The illustrated handbook: what crapkit is, how every piece works, and where each command earns its keep. Also at docs/handbook.html, self-contained, so it opens straight from a clone.

docs/adoption.md

The judgment layer over the quickstarts: scope granularity, exclude vs lane, scoped_tests wiring, the first-verify taint hazard.

docs/configuration.md

Every crapkit.toml key: type, default, and what it does.

docs/lanes.md

The lane model, vitest and jest and pytest recipes, artifact reuse, flake retest, containers.

docs/resources.md

Worker budgets, command cleanup, log rotation, test evidence retention and safe cleanup.

docs/ratchet.md

Seeding, pruning, the git merge driver, metric stamps, debt policy, overrides.

docs/upgrading.md

Existing installations: analysis and key versions, saved state, plugin alignment and Windows upgrades.

docs/portable-records.md

Lossless exports, portable baselines and ratchets, including filenames with delimiters.

docs/agent-json.md

The machine surface: schema, every payload field, real captured examples.

docs/comparison.md

Where crapkit sits next to radon, xenon, wily, coverage.py and SonarQube, and how they run together.

AGENTS.md

The burn-down loop an agent runs, and the rules for changing crapkit itself.

plugin/

Three skills and the MCP server for Claude Code and Codex, with advisory PostToolUse hook instructions for Claude Code.

crapkit.schema.json is the authority on the config file shape.

Development

pip install -e ".[dev]"
git config core.hooksPath git-hooks
python tools/testing/run.py

The dev extra includes pytest, pytest-cov, pytest-xdist and coverage.py. The shared runner owns the unit and E2E schedule; use --unit-workers 1 for serial unit reproduction or --coverage for combined branch coverage and JUnit. The git config line arms the complexity gate. See CONTRIBUTING.md for development and the verified implementation report for complete Windows source and Linux wheel results, focused benchmarks and their limits.

Maintainer and project background

crapkit is created and maintained by Jean-François Gagné. Read the project background for the problem it addresses and how it fits into his work on software and AI.

License

MIT. See LICENSE.

Available Tools

12 tools
check_configConfig and repo health checkA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Checks that crapkit.toml agrees with the repo: typo keys, empty scopes, missing lane cwds, runners that fail to start. Run it first when any tool answers strangely or the ranking misses a file, and list_runs when only the history is in question. It needs no run, probes each runner once, runs no lane, and any problem arrives with isError true. repo can be any directory under the checkout, and one with no crapkit.toml above it answers a pointer, never a parent's config.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
lanesNoper declared lane
storeNothe run store
schemaNopayload schema version, 1
problemsNoFAIL findings as sentences naming the fix; non-empty is exit 1 and the result carries isError true
versionsNothe tools behind every number
warningsNoWARN findings: unmeasured directories, scopes with a lane but no scoped_tests template, artifacts written outside .crapkit, lanes without results_artifact; exit stays 0
resourcesNoeffective resource policy; limits and estimates, not sampled utilization
newest_runNothe newest run, or null when nothing has run
analysis_versionNothe analysis semantics version; with the lizard version it stamps every ratchet mark, so a bump refuses old marks until the repo re-seeds

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint false, and the description adds behavior beyond those: it needs no run, probes each runner once, runs no lane, and reports any problem via isError true. It also clarifies the no-parent-config fallback behavior. Nothing contradicts the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and then moves through usage, behavior, and parameter details in a logical order. Every sentence adds unique information and there is no filler, making it dense but efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter, non-destructive check tool with an output schema, the description covers purpose, when to use it, what behavior to expect, error signaling, and parameter semantics. The output schema can handle the return structure, so nothing needed for correct invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents the repo parameter and its default, and the description adds further meaning: repo can be any directory under the checkout, and absence of a crapkit.toml above it produces a pointer rather than inheriting a parent's config. This goes beyond the schema's description and meaningfully clarifies the parameter's semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Checks') and a specific resource ('crapkit.toml') and enumerates the concrete failure categories it catches: typo keys, empty scopes, missing lane cwds, and runners that fail to start. It also names the sibling list_runs and distinguishes when that tool is the right choice, so an agent can tell this tool apart from its siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit guidance is given: run this tool first when any tool answers strangely or when ranking misses a file, and use list_runs instead when only history is in question. It also clarifies that repo can be any directory under the checkout and that a directory with no crapkit.toml above it yields a pointer rather than falling back to a parent's config, which removes ambiguity about invocation context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

check_gateCommit gate verdict for an edited fileA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Checks whether an edited file clears the hook's commit gate: fresh ccn per changed function against its scope's ceiling less pardoned ratchet debt. Call it after an edit once get_function_brief states the rule. CLI verify gives the repo-wide verdict. It runs no tests, and a breach reads gate.ok false, not an error. path is repo-relative or absolute inside repo, outside or missing is a config error. A tracked file is judged on its diff from HEAD, an untracked one in full, an unchanged or unscoped one judges 0. repo may be any directory under the checkout.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesrepo-relative source file to judge as edited
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
gateNothe verdict block
noteNofixed reminder that coverage is the baseline run's and complexity the working tree's; crapkit verify gives the real verdict
schemaNopayload schema version, 1
functionsNoevery function in the file, rescored
baseline_runNoid of the run whose coverage was reused
baseline_commitNothat run's commit, full sha

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses significant behavior beyond annotations: it runs no tests, a breach returns gate.ok false rather than an error, path outside/missing causes a config error, and tracked vs untracked files are judged differently. These details are not implied by readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, or destructiveHint, adding valuable operational context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but well-structured, front-loading the core purpose and usage, then covering edge cases. Every sentence adds essential information—purpose, timing, scope, error handling, and file-state logic—with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the description need not explain return values. It covers usage timing, input constraints, and behavioral edge cases (tracked/untracked, unchanged/unscoped) comprehensively. For a tool with this complexity, the description provides everything an agent needs to call it correctly without additional inference.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaning beyond the schema by clarifying that path can be repo-relative or absolute inside the repo, and that outside or missing is a config error. It also states repo may be any directory under the checkout, which extends the schema's default behavior. This goes beyond the schema's basic descriptions, though not exhaustively covering every parameter nuance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description precisely states the tool's purpose: checking whether an edited file clears the hook's commit gate, with a specific rule (fresh ccn against scope ceiling minus pardoned debt). It also differentiates from siblings by referencing get_function_brief as a prerequisite and CLI verify as a repo-wide alternative, making it clear when this tool is the right choice.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit usage guidance is provided: 'Call it after an edit once get_function_brief states the rule' and 'CLI verify gives the repo-wide verdict.' This tells the agent when to invoke this tool and when to use a different one, plus clarifies that it runs no tests, preventing expectations of test results.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_function_briefStart-editing packet for one functionA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns one function's start-editing packet from the newest trusted run: scored row, uncovered lines and the refresh, test, gate and verify command lines, none of them run. Use it once a function is chosen. Skip it for picking what to fix, that is get_next_item, and for a score across runs, get_function_history. Every call shingles the repo for twins, seconds on a large corpus. name must live in path. name takes the long name, a bare identifier, a start line or NAME#2, exact match first. A miss lists the file's functions instead of erroring.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesthe bare identifier (classify, or route for a Rust `route cmd : & Cmd`) or the whole long_name get_next_item printed (classify( score , late )); both resolve, exact match first
pathYesrepo-relative source file, forward slashes
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
laneNothe lane whose artifact produced cov and uncovered_lines, verbatim from the config; null when no lane covers the scope
pathNothe resolved file, repo-relative
churnNothe file's churn, or null when it had no commits in the window
notesNoprose the config carries for whoever edits here
staleNotrue when the run's commit is not HEAD, so every number here describes an older tree; run commands.refresh first
commitNothat run's commit, full sha
handleNoshort name form: the bare identifier or (anonymous)#N, the same value get_next_item prints
paramsNoparameters in declaration order, so a test can call the function without opening the file
remedyNodecompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok: the branch the session takes; scored.remedy carries the same value
run_idNoid of the run these numbers come from: the newest trusted run (a coverage run, or a verify run whose verdict passed)
schemaNopayload schema version, 1
scoredNothe whole scored row from the run
sourceNothe function's own text, start to end inclusive, newlines intact: editable without reading the file
targetNothis scope's effective ccn ceiling, the same value as gate_rule.ceiling
attemptsNoevery claim ever taken on this function, oldest first; [] on a first attempt, and a row with closed null is a claim still open
commandsNothe rest of the loop as whole command lines for this file and scope; run them as given
couplingNoup to 5 change-coupling partners at support 5 and confidence 0.5, strongest first; empty when none qualify; list_coupled_files has the repo-wide list
functionNothe resolved lizard long name, whichever name form was asked with
regrowthNodid this get fixed before
versionsNowhat produced these numbers
gate_ruleNowhat check_gate will judge this edit by
est_splitsNo0 when ccn <= target, else ceil(ccn / target)
file_totalsNothe file rolled up
ratchet_markNothe committed ratchet mark, or null when the function carries none or the repo has no ratchet file
file_functionsNoevery scored function in the same file: where an extracted helper lands, and which names are taken
uncovered_linesNoline numbers no test ran; [] when the span is fully covered; null when no artifact could answer, then uncovered_lines_note says why
duplication_twinsNoup to 10 near-duplicate functions at similarity 0.8, best first; empty is normal; list_duplicate_functions has the repo-wide pairs
est_uncovered_pathsNoround((1 - cov) x ccn)
uncovered_lines_noteNopresent only when uncovered_lines is null: the reason and the move (stale artifact, no test imports the file, coverage_optional scope)

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond annotations: the packet's commands are 'none of them run', every call 'shingles the repo for twins' with a cost warning ('seconds on a large corpus'), and a miss 'lists the file's functions instead of erroring'. This is useful non-obvious behavior that annotations cannot express.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded: the core return value is stated first, followed by usage routing, cost warning, and parameter semantics. Every sentence earns its place, and the sibling differentiation is packed into one sentence without bloat.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema, so return values need not be re-explained. The description covers purpose, usage timing, exclusions, cost, name resolution, and miss behavior. For a read-only, idempotent tool with 100% schema coverage and an output schema, nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all three parameters. The description adds meaning beyond the schema by explaining the name resolution order ('exact match first'), the accepted name forms ('long name, a bare identifier, a start line or NAME#2'), and the constraint that 'name must live in path'. It also clarifies the miss behavior, which helps an agent interpret a non-error response.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Returns'), a specific resource ('one function's start-editing packet from the newest trusted run'), and enumerates the packet's contents (scored row, uncovered lines, command lines). It also explicitly distinguishes itself from siblings get_next_item and get_function_history, so an agent can tell them apart without opening schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives explicit when-to-use guidance ('Use it once a function is chosen') and explicit when-not-to-use guidance ('Skip it for picking what to fix, that is get_next_item, and for a score across runs, get_function_history'). It also names the alternative tools, leaving no ambiguity about routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_function_historyOne function's score across runsA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns one function's ccn, coverage, crap and flag in every run that measured it, oldest first, plus its ratchet mark. Use it to tell improving from decaying or regrown, and get_function_brief instead to start an edit. history true spawns git log -L capped at 10 commits, and tests true is null unless the lane recorded contexts. name resolves off the newest run that scored path, so a substring such as "eval" fans out to one entry per long name matched, and repo may be any directory under the measured checkout.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesthe bare identifier (classify, or route for a Rust `route cmd : & Cmd`) or the whole long_name get_next_item printed (classify( score , late )); both resolve, exact match first
pathYesrepo-relative source file, forward slashes
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)
testsNoalso list the tests covering this function (coverage.py contexts), as tests
historyNoalso list the commits that touched this function (git log -L), as commits

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
nameNothe name argument as given
pathNothe file asked about
schemaNopayload schema version, 1
functionsNothe functions name resolved to, in store order

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnly/idempotent annotations, the description discloses meaningful behaviors: results are ordered oldest first, history spawns git log -L capped at 10 commits, tests is null unless contexts were recorded, and name resolution uses the newest run scoring path with substring fan-out. This adds real behavioral context the annotations alone do not provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core return value and usage, and every sentence contributes useful information. It is somewhat dense, especially in the trailing clauses about history/tests/name/repo, but remains well-structured and not padded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the return shape is already covered. The description completes the picture by specifying ordering, optional-parameter behavior, name resolution rules, repo scope, and the sibling alternative. An agent has enough context to invoke this tool correctly without further inference.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema coverage is 100%, the description adds important semantic details beyond the parameter descriptions: history's git log cap, tests' null behavior, name's newest-run resolution and substring fan-out, and repo's flexibility to any directory under the checkout. This materially helps an agent choose and format parameter values correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action and resource: it returns one function's ccn, coverage, crap, flag, and ratchet mark across runs, oldest first. This clearly distinguishes the tool from siblings like get_function_brief and get_trend by focusing on per-run history for a single function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says to use this tool to tell improving from decaying or regrown functions, and to use get_function_brief instead when starting an edit. This gives the agent both a positive use case and a concrete alternative, satisfying the when/when-not guidance requirement.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_next_itemNext function to fixA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns the next function to fix as a work packet, the newest trusted run's worst row by crap. Use it to start a fix, list_worklist to survey the same run by risk, and get_function_brief once a function is chosen. It runs no tests, and empty true means the queue is spent, not the work, so read reasons. Filters cut before top counts: top 3 with exclude ["tests/"] returns the three worst rows outside tests, and an unknown scope name is a config error.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topNoreturn the next N packets as items instead of one item (N >= 1, default 1)
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)
scopeNorestrict the ranking to these declared scopes (exact [[scope]] names from crapkit.toml, one --scope each)
excludeNoskip rows whose path or long function name contains any of these fragments (one --exclude each)

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
itemNothe one packet, present when empty is false and top is absent or 1
emptyNotrue when the queue has nothing to hand out; then reasons is present and item and items are absent
itemsNoup to top packets in crap-descending order, present when empty is false and top is above 1
staleNotrue when the run's commit is not HEAD, so cov, crap and uncovered_lines describe an older tree; crapkit coverage --reuse-unchanged (get_function_brief's commands.refresh) clears it
commitNothat run's commit, full sha
run_idNoid of the run these numbers come from: the newest trusted run (a coverage run, or a verify run whose verdict passed)
schemaNopayload schema version, 1
reasonsNowhy the queue is empty, present only when empty is true; the stop condition is empty true with skipped_claimed and no_lane_over_target both 0 or absent
skipped_claimedNorows another session's claim hid; present only when non-zero, and list_claims names the holders
skipped_no_laneNorows above the floor that no lane measures, kept out of the ranking because their cov 0 is a tooling gap, not a testing gap

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark it readOnly, non-destructive, and idempotent. The description adds behavior beyond that: 'It runs no tests', 'empty true means the queue is spent, not the work, so read reasons', 'Filters cut before top counts', and 'an unknown scope name is a config error.' No contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, each serving a distinct purpose: purpose, usage routing, behavioral caveat, filter semantics. Front-loaded and dense without fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and annotations covering safety, the description addresses usage, filtering, error conditions, and queue semantics. It is complete for an agent to decide when and how to invoke it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions cover all four parameters, but the description enriches them: it explains filter ordering ('Filters cut before top counts'), gives a concrete example (top 3 with exclude ["tests/"]), and states scope errors. This is additive beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Returns the next function to fix as a work packet, the newest trusted run's worst row by crap.' This names the verb, resource, and ranking criterion, and later contrasts it with list_worklist and get_function_brief, making its purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly states 'Use it to start a fix, list_worklist to survey the same run by risk, and get_function_brief once a function is chosen.' This gives clear when-to-use and alternatives, plus the note 'It runs no tests' adds a usage caveat.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_ratchet_reportRatchet debt burn-downA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Reports the ratchet debt burn-down: open marks with their age, repayments and policy findings. Use it to judge whether marked debt is repaid or piling up, and get_function_history for one function's mark. It reads the marks file and its git log only, ages count back from the newest commit touching that file, never the clock, and no marks file means zeros. repo can be any directory under a measured checkout, and an unmeasured one answers isError true with the setup pointer.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
openNomarks open on disk, working tree included: an uncommitted seed counts
oldestNoup to 20 open marks, oldest first
schemaNopayload schema version, 1
anchor_tsNounix seconds of the newest commit that touched the ratchet file; every age and window counts back from here, never from the wall clock; 0 with no ratchet history
uncommittedNomarks the working tree and the newest committed ratchet file disagree on: added, repaid or tightened but not committed
dropped_totalNomarks repaid over the whole committed history
dropped_last_30dNomarks repaid in the 30 days before anchor_ts
dropped_last_90dNomarks repaid in the 90 days before anchor_ts
policy_violationsNonull when no debt policy is configured, [] when the policy ran clean, else the findings as sentences

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive annotations, the description reveals material behavior: it reads only the marks file and its git log, ages are computed from the newest commit touching that file rather than the clock, a missing marks file yields zeros, and unmeasured checkouts return isError true with a setup pointer. This exceeds what annotations alone communicate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but every clause earns its place: core output, intended use, alternative tool, data source, age semantics, edge case, and error behavior are all packed without redundancy. The most important information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given an output schema already exists, the description covers all the essential call-time knowledge: what the report contains, how to use it, what data it reads, how age is computed, and behavior for missing files and unmeasured repos. Nothing critical is left for the agent to infer.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already fully documents the single optional repo parameter with 100% coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description adds meaningful semantics by clarifying that repo can be any directory under a measured checkout and that unmeasured ones produce an isError response, which is value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Reports the ratchet debt burn-down' and enumerates exactly what it contains (open marks, age, repayments, policy findings). It also names get_function_history as the sibling for single-function marks, so the tool is clearly distinguished from nearby alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly states the intended decision use case: 'Use it to judge whether marked debt is repaid or piling up.' It also gives a direct alternative with a condition: 'get_function_history for one function's mark.' This is clear when-to-use and when-to-use-elsewhere guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_trendDebt trend per runA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns per-run totals for every trusted run, oldest first, with a grade per scope. Use it for the whole repo's trajectory. Use get_function_history for one function and get_ratchet_report for marked debt. It runs no lane and spawns no git. The first call on a large store sums every run into a rollup cache and takes seconds. Later calls read the cache back. repo may be any directory under a checkout where crapkit init and crapkit coverage have run. An unmeasured one answers isError true with the setup pointer.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
runsNoone row per trusted run, oldest first
schemaNopayload schema version, 1
targetNothe [crapkit] target: the default ccn ceiling every scope inherits unless it sets its own

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark this as read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive, and the description adds useful behavior beyond that: first call on a large store builds a rollup cache and takes seconds, later calls read the cache, and unmeasured repos return isError true with the setup pointer. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Every sentence carries distinct information: core behavior, usage selection, side-effect profile, performance characteristics, parameter prerequisites, and error behavior. The description is front-loaded with the main result and purpose, with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple schema, rich annotations, and presence of an output schema, the description covers all critical context: when to use it, alternatives, behavioral quirks, performance expectations, and failure mode. An agent has everything needed to select and invoke this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds meaningful parameter context: repo may be any directory under a checkout where crapkit init and crapkit coverage have run. This clarifies allowed values beyond the schema's path-to-root wording.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: returns per-run totals for every trusted run with a grade per scope, ordered oldest first. It also names sibling tools for different cases, making the distinction explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says to use this tool for the whole repo's trajectory and directs to get_function_history for one function and get_ratchet_report for marked debt. It also states the prerequisite that crapkit init and crapkit coverage must have run, and notes it runs no lane and spawns no git.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list_claimsOpen queue claimsA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists open claims on queue items, oldest first. Use it when get_next_item answers empty or skipped_claimed above 0, and use get_function_brief to see one function's own attempts. No tool here writes a claim: the CLI releases a stale one with crapkit claims release PATH NAME, and verify closes one at the ceiling. repo may be any directory under the checkout, since the server walks up to the nearest crapkit.toml. No crapkit.toml above it answers an init pointer, and a checkout never scored answers a coverage pointer, both as isError true.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
openNonumber of open claims
claimsNoopen claims, oldest first
schemaNopayload schema version, 1

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior, but the description adds rich context beyond them: ordering, repo path resolution via walking up to crapkit.toml, and two specific error states (init pointer, coverage pointer) that return isError true. It also explains the absence of write capabilities and how claims are released or closed elsewhere.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the purpose and usage triggers, and every sentence carries relevant information. It is slightly dense with CLI command syntax and edge-case error behavior, but none of that is filler given the tool's role in a larger workflow.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the description need not explain return values. It covers usage triggers, path semantics, error scenarios, and the write-boundary of the tool set. Everything an agent needs to call this correctly is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds meaning beyond the schema by clarifying that 'repo may be any directory under the checkout, since the server walks up to the nearest crapkit.toml.' This is useful semantic context for an otherwise simple parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb, resource, and ordering ('Lists open claims on queue items, oldest first'), and explicitly distinguishes itself from sibling get_next_item by naming when it is needed. An agent can clearly tell what this returns without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit triggering conditions ('when get_next_item answers empty or skipped_claimed above 0') and names an alternative purpose for get_function_brief. It also clarifies that no tool writes a claim and points to the CLI for stale-claim release, leaving no ambiguity about when to invoke it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list_coupled_filesFiles that change togetherA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists file pairs that keep landing in the same commits over the churn window, strongest first, at most 50. Use it before editing a file to learn what an edit drags along. Use list_duplicate_functions for copied code rather than co-change. It reads git log once per call, not the scored run. An empty list means no pair cleared both thresholds, not a missing run. A pair must clear both thresholds: min_support 5 needs five shared commits, min_confidence 0.5 means the rarer file moved with its partner half the time. repo defaults to the server's own root.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)
min_supportNominimum shared commits before a pair counts (default 5)
min_confidenceNominimum P(pair changes together), 0 to 1 (default 0.5)

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
pairsNopairs clearing both thresholds, ordered by support x confidence descending, at most 50
schemaNopayload schema version, 1
window_monthsNomonths of git history the pairs were counted over (the config's churn_window_months)

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond that: it reads git log once per call rather than the scored run, an empty list means no pair cleared thresholds, and both thresholds must be cleared. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Every sentence earns its place: purpose, use case, sibling distinction, performance behavior, empty-result semantics, and threshold semantics. The most important information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with an output schema, annotations, and only three optional parameters, the description fully covers when to call it, what it returns at a high level, how to interpret empty results, cost implications, and parameter meanings. Nothing material is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description goes further by explaining what each parameter means operationally: min_support 5 requires five shared commits, min_confidence 0.5 means the rarer file moved with its partner half the time, and repo defaults to the server's own root. This helps the agent choose thresholds appropriately rather than treating them as opaque numbers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Lists file pairs that keep landing in the same commits over the churn window, strongest first, at most 50.' It also differentiates from list_duplicate_functions, so an agent can distinguish this tool from its sibling immediately.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use it: 'Use it before editing a file to learn what an edit drags along.' It also gives a clear alternative and exclusion: 'Use list_duplicate_functions for copied code rather than co-change.'

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list_duplicate_functionsNear-duplicate function pairsA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists near-duplicate function pairs in the newest run, at most 50. Use it before a refactor so twins are folded together, and get_function_brief for one function's twins. It shingles source on every call, seconds on a large repo, skips functions under 8 lines and same-file pairs, and an empty list means no pair reached similarity. similarity is shared shingles over the smaller function: 1.0 admits only a function found whole inside another, 0.8 four lines in five, and repo may be any directory under the checkout.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)
similarityNocontainment threshold, shared over smaller, 0 to 1 (default 0.8)

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
pairsNopairs at or above similarity, best containment first, at most 50
run_idNothe newest run whose rows were compared
schemaNopayload schema version, 1

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds valuable runtime context: it shingles on every call, takes seconds on large repos, skips short and same-file functions, and explains that an empty list means no pair met the threshold. This goes well beyond the structured annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but every clause earns its place: result scope, usage context, performance, filtering rules, empty-result meaning, threshold semantics, and repo scope. It front-loads the core purpose before diving into details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers what the tool returns, the limit, empty-result meaning, performance expectations, filtering behavior, parameter semantics, and when to use it. With a rich output schema and annotations present, no critical context is missing for an agent to invoke this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Even though schema coverage is 100%, the description adds meaningful interpretation: similarity is shared shingles over the smaller function, with 1.0 and 0.8 explained through concrete examples. It also clarifies that repo may be any directory under the checkout, going beyond the schema's generic path description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a precise verb and resource: 'Lists near-duplicate function pairs in the newest run, at most 50.' It clearly distinguishes this from siblings like get_function_brief by focusing on pair-level duplication in the newest run.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says to use it before a refactor and points to get_function_brief as the alternative when only one function's twins are needed. This gives the agent both a trigger condition and a routing decision.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list_runsScored run historyA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists every run in the store, oldest first by id. Use it to date the store or to see which commit the other tools answer from. Use get_trend for per-run totals and get_function_history for one function's scores per run. It reads the store only and spawns no git. repo may be any directory under the checkout, because the server walks up to the nearest crapkit.toml, and a relative path resolves from the server's start directory. No crapkit.toml above it answers an init pointer, and a checkout never scored answers a coverage pointer, both as isError true.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
runsNoevery run in the store, oldest first
schemaNopayload schema version, 1

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover safety (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed world), yet the description adds substantial context beyond them: no git is spawned, repo path resolution walks up to the nearest crapkit.toml, relative paths resolve from the server's start directory, and two failure modes return isError true. This is exactly the extra behavioral detail annotations cannot carry.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose and primary use case are front-loaded in the first sentence, and every subsequent sentence carries distinct information (alternatives, git behavior, path resolution, error pointers). It is dense and runs long in a single block, but no sentence is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need no explanation; the description instead covers the gaps that matter — path resolution, absence of git side effects, and the two isError pointer outcomes. Complete for a read-only listing tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with one optional param, so baseline is 3. The description goes further by explaining that repo accepts any directory under the checkout because the server walks up to the nearest crapkit.toml, which is path-resolution behavior the schema's one-line description does not convey.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource with ordering semantics ('Lists every run in the store, oldest first by id') and immediately names the siblings it is not (get_trend, get_function_history). An agent can distinguish it from all eleven siblings without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit 'use it to date the store or to see which commit the other tools answer from' plus named alternatives with the condition that selects each (per-run totals vs one function's per-run scores). Nothing is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list_worklistRisk ranking of every functionA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists the newest trusted run's whole risk ranking, every admitted function ordered by ccn times recency-weighted churn. Use it to survey a repo or split work by file, and get_next_item for the one crap-ranked packet to fix now. It runs no tests, keeps finished rows so it never empties, and reads the churn cache, not git. scope narrows before top caps, so scope ["core"] with top 20 returns the 20 riskiest in core, an unknown scope name is a config error, and repo may be any directory under the measured checkout.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topNocap the active list (default: the config's worklist_top, 50)
repoNopath to the scored repo's root (default: the repo the server was started in)
scopeNorestrict the ranking to these declared scopes (exact [[scope]] names from crapkit.toml, one --scope each)

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
floorNothe effective worklist_floor: rows under this ccn are listed only when over their ceiling or in a hot file
staleNotrue when the run's commit is not HEAD, so cov, crap and uncovered_lines describe an older tree; crapkit coverage --reuse-unchanged (get_function_brief's commands.refresh) clears it
activeNothe ranking: functions in files with churn in the window, risk descending, cut at top or worklist_top
commitNothat run's commit, full sha
run_idNoid of the run these numbers come from: the newest trusted run (a coverage run, or a verify run whose verdict passed)
schemaNopayload schema version, 1
dormant_topNothe first 10 dormant functions, same shape as active: sleeping hazards kept out of the queue
active_totalNoactive rows admitted before the cap: what top or worklist_top hid
dormant_countNoranked functions whose file had no commits in the window
churn_window_monthsNomonths of git history the churn weights cover

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive hints. The description adds crucial behavioral context: 'reads the churn cache, not git', 'keeps finished rows so it never empties', and the precedence rule 'scope narrows before top caps'. These details go beyond annotations and are essential for correct expectations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no waste. The purpose is front-loaded, followed by usage, then behavioral and parameter notes. Every clause earns its place; the structure is logical and scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema (so return format is covered), all parameters are optional with defaults explained, and the description covers usage, behavior, and parameter semantics comprehensively. An agent has everything needed to invoke it correctly without further inference.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 100% schema coverage, the description adds meaningful value: it explains precedence ('scope narrows before top caps'), gives a concrete example ('scope ["core"] with top 20 returns the 20 riskiest in core'), and clarifies repo constraints ('any directory under the measured checkout'). These enrich the schema definitions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Lists the newest trusted run's whole risk ranking' and defines the ordering criterion ('ccn times recency-weighted churn'). It clearly distinguishes from siblings like get_next_item (single item) and get_trend (trend analysis).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states usage intent: 'Use it to survey a repo or split work by file' and directs to the sibling get_next_item for the single worst item. It also clarifies what the tool does not do ('runs no tests') and that it 'keeps finished rows so it never empties', aiding when-to-use decisions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 4 tool updatesv0.7.6
    • Changedcheck_gate4 fields changed
      • changedOutput schema / properties / functions / items / properties / remedy / description
        Previous value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"
      • changedOutput schema / properties / functions / items / properties / remedy / enum
        Previous value: -[
        -  "decompose",
        -  "add-tests",
        -  "ok"
        -]New value: +[
        +  "decompose",
        +  "split-lines",
        +  "add-tests",
        +  "ok"
        +]
      • changedOutput schema / properties / gate / properties / breaches / items / properties / remedy / description
        Previous value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"
      • changedOutput schema / properties / gate / properties / breaches / items / properties / remedy / enum
        Previous value: -[
        -  "decompose",
        -  "add-tests",
        -  "ok"
        -]New value: +[
        +  "decompose",
        +  "split-lines",
        +  "add-tests",
        +  "ok"
        +]
    • Changedget_function_brief6 fields changed
      • changedOutput schema / properties / file_functions / items / properties / remedy / description
        Previous value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"
      • changedOutput schema / properties / file_functions / items / properties / remedy / enum
        Previous value: -[
        -  "decompose",
        -  "add-tests",
        -  "ok"
        -]New value: +[
        +  "decompose",
        +  "split-lines",
        +  "add-tests",
        +  "ok"
        +]
      • changedOutput schema / properties / remedy / description
        Previous value: -"decompose, add-tests or ok: the branch the session takes; scored.remedy carries the same value"New value: +"decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok: the branch the session takes; scored.remedy carries the same value"
      • changedOutput schema / properties / remedy / enum
        Previous value: -[
        -  "decompose",
        -  "add-tests",
        -  "ok"
        -]New value: +[
        +  "decompose",
        +  "split-lines",
        +  "add-tests",
        +  "ok"
        +]
      • changedOutput schema / properties / scored / properties / remedy / description
        Previous value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"
      • changedOutput schema / properties / scored / properties / remedy / enum
        Previous value: -[
        -  "decompose",
        -  "add-tests",
        -  "ok"
        -]New value: +[
        +  "decompose",
        +  "split-lines",
        +  "add-tests",
        +  "ok"
        +]
    • Changedget_next_item4 fields changed
      • changedOutput schema / properties / item / properties / remedy / description
        Previous value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"
      • changedOutput schema / properties / item / properties / remedy / enum
        Previous value: -[
        -  "decompose",
        -  "add-tests",
        -  "ok"
        -]New value: +[
        +  "decompose",
        +  "split-lines",
        +  "add-tests",
        +  "ok"
        +]
      • changedOutput schema / properties / items / items / properties / remedy / description
        Previous value: -"decompose (ccn over ceiling), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"New value: +"decompose (ccn over ceiling), split-lines (another function shares its source lines, so coverage cannot tell them apart and no test lowers the score until the definitions sit on separate lines), add-tests (coverage short) or ok (nothing left to do)"
      • changedOutput schema / properties / items / items / properties / remedy / enum
        Previous value: -[
        -  "decompose",
        -  "add-tests",
        -  "ok"
        -]New value: +[
        +  "decompose",
        +  "split-lines",
        +  "add-tests",
        +  "ok"
        +]
    • Changedlist_worklist4 fields changed
      • changedOutput schema / properties / active / items / properties / remedy / description
        Previous value: -"decompose, add-tests or ok; only decompose and add-tests rows with a lane reach get_next_item"New value: +"decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok; every row but ok reaches get_next_item when a lane measures it"
      • changedOutput schema / properties / active / items / properties / remedy / enum
        Previous value: -[
        -  "decompose",
        -  "add-tests",
        -  "ok"
        -]New value: +[
        +  "decompose",
        +  "split-lines",
        +  "add-tests",
        +  "ok"
        +]
      • changedOutput schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / remedy / description
        Previous value: -"decompose, add-tests or ok; only decompose and add-tests rows with a lane reach get_next_item"New value: +"decompose, split-lines, add-tests or ok; every row but ok reaches get_next_item when a lane measures it"
      • changedOutput schema / properties / dormant_top / items / properties / remedy / enum
        Previous value: -[
        -  "decompose",
        -  "add-tests",
        -  "ok"
        -]New value: +[
        +  "decompose",
        +  "split-lines",
        +  "add-tests",
        +  "ok"
        +]
  2. 1 tool updatev0.7.2
    • Changedcheck_config1 field changed
      • addedOutput schema / properties / resources
        Added value: +{
        +  "description": "effective resource policy; limits and estimates, not sampled utilization",
        +  "properties": {
        +    "available_cpus": {
        +      "description": "CPUs visible to this process",
        +      "type": "integer"
        +    },
        +    "budget_directory": {
        +      "description": "coordination directory; status does not create it",
        +      "type": "string"
        +    },
        +    "coordination": {
        +      "description": "worker slot ownership scope",
        +      "type": "string"
        +    },
        +    "cpu_probe": {
        +      "description": "CPU affinity or fallback probe used",
        +      "type": "string"
        +    },
        +    "default_chunks_per_worker": {
        +      "description": "chunk target used by automatic pool sizing",
        +      "type": "integer"
        +    },
        +    "default_source_bytes_per_worker": {
        +      "description": "source-byte target for automatic spawn sizing; null for other start methods",
        +      "type": [
        +        "integer",
        +        "null"
        +      ]
        +    },
        +    "estimated_pool_memory_mb": {
        +      "description": "estimated memory for the allowed worker count",
        +      "type": "integer"
        +    },
        +    "inherited_analysis_workers": {
        +      "description": "valid inherited worker ceiling or null",
        +      "type": [
        +        "integer",
        +        "null"
        +      ]
        +    },
        +    "log_max_bytes": {
        +      "description": "byte limit per current and backup lane log; zero is unlimited",
        +      "type": "integer"
        +    },
        +    "memory_budget_mb": {
        +      "description": "inherited memory sizing hint or null",
        +      "type": [
        +        "integer",
        +        "null"
        +      ]
        +    },
        +    "memory_is_hard_limit": {
        +      "description": "false: memory policy sizes workers without an OS allocation limit",
        +      "type": "boolean"
        +    },
        +    "pool_worker_limit": {
        +      "description": "per-pool ceiling after CPU, memory and inherited limits",
        +      "type": "integer"
        +    },
        +    "requested_analysis_workers": {
        +      "description": "configured per-pool ceiling; zero selects the default",
        +      "type": "integer"
        +    },
        +    "serial_fallback": {
        +      "description": "busy slots allow serial work without waiting",
        +      "type": "boolean"
        +    },
        +    "shared_pool_limit": {
        +      "description": "shared numbered pool slot ceiling",
        +      "type": "integer"
        +    },
        +    "test_retention_count": {
        +      "description": "default test evidence count limit; zero disables it",
        +      "type": "integer"
        +    },
        +    "test_retention_days": {
        +      "description": "default test evidence age limit; zero disables it",
        +      "type": "integer"
        +    },
        +    "worker_memory_estimate_mb": {
        +      "description": "memory estimate per analysis worker",
        +      "type": "integer"
        +    }
        +  },
        +  "type": "object"
        +}
  3. 1 tool updatev0.7.0
    • Changedget_function_brief2 fields changed
      • changedOutput schema / properties / commands / properties / refresh_writes_run / description
        Previous value: -"always true: refresh is the one command here that writes a run to the store; the other three change nothing"New value: +"always true: refresh writes a coverage run to the store; other commands can also write caches or test artifacts"
      • changedOutput schema / properties / commands / properties / scoped_tests / description
        Previous value: -"this scope's own test command with the file filled in, or null when the scope declares no [crapkit.scoped_tests] template"New value: +"the crapkit test-scoped call for this literal file, or null when the scope declares no [crapkit.scoped_tests] template"
  4. 22 tool updatesv0.6.0
    • Removedbrief
    • Addedcheck_config
    • Addedcheck_gate
    • Removedcoupling
    • Removeddoctor
    • Removedduplication
    • Removedexplain
    • Removedgate
    • Addedget_function_brief
    • Addedget_function_history
    • Addedget_next_item
    • Addedget_ratchet_report
    • Addedget_trend
    • Addedlist_claims
    • Addedlist_coupled_files
    • Addedlist_duplicate_functions
    • Addedlist_runs
    • Addedlist_worklist
    • Removednext_item
    • Removedratchet_report
    • Removedruns
    • Removedworklist
  5. 5 tool updatesv0.5.0
    • Changedbrief1 field changed
      • addedInput schema / required
        Added value: +[
        +  "path",
        +  "name"
        +]
    • Changedexplain3 fields changed
      • addedInput schema / properties / history
        Added value: +{
        +  "description": "also list the commits that touched this function (git log -L), as `commits`",
        +  "type": "boolean"
        +}
      • addedInput schema / properties / tests
        Added value: +{
        +  "description": "also list the tests covering this function (coverage.py contexts), as `tests`",
        +  "type": "boolean"
        +}
      • addedInput schema / required
        Added value: +[
        +  "path",
        +  "name"
        +]
    • Addedgate
    • Changednext_item1 field changed
      • addedInput schema / properties / scope
        Added value: +{
        +  "description": "restrict the ranking to these declared scopes (exact names from crapkit.toml, one --scope each)",
        +  "items": {
        +    "type": "string"
        +  },
        +  "type": "array"
        +}
    • Changedworklist1 field changed
      • addedInput schema / properties / scope
        Added value: +{
        +  "description": "restrict the ranking to these declared scopes (exact names from crapkit.toml, one --scope each)",
        +  "items": {
        +    "type": "string"
        +  },
        +  "type": "array"
        +}
  6. 9 tool updatesv0.4.13
    • First observedbrief
    • First observedcoupling
    • First observeddoctor
    • First observedduplication
    • First observedexplain
    • First observednext_item
    • First observedratchet_report
    • First observedruns
    • First observedworklist

TDQS

A4.9/5.0

Scored across 12 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: history, gate, next item, worklist, brief, config, ratchet, trend, claims, coupling, duplicates, and runs. Even similarly named get_function_history and get_function_brief are clearly separated by context (across-run history vs edit-start packet).

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: get_ for single-item retrieval, list_ for enumerations, and check_ for validations. There are no mixed conventions or vague verbs.

Tool Count5/5

12 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of the code-quality analysis domain (metrics, queue, config, coupling, duplicates) with no redundancy or bloat.

Completeness5/5

The surface covers all major read-only workflows: function inspection, work selection, trend analysis, gate checks, config validation, and structural analysis (coupling/duplication). Write operations like releasing claims or running tests are intentionally CLI-side, so there are no obvious gaps for the server's role.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessResponsive

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables access to Codacy's code quality platform through natural language, providing repository management, security analysis, pull request reviews, and local CLI-based code analysis. Supports comprehensive code quality monitoring including issues, coverage, security vulnerabilities, and technical debt assessment across organizations and repositories.
    391 npm
    63
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    PHP static analysis MCP server with 11 tools for querying 60+ code quality metrics, detecting problems (God Class, dependency cycles, SOLID violations), analyzing dependencies, identifying refactoring priorities, and mapping test coverage — all from live analysis data.
    11
    2 npm
    90
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    DocGuard, an official, zero-dependency Node.js MCP server (npm: docguard-cli, docguard mcp) exposing 5 read-only doc-governance tools: guard, score, explain, verify-claims, diagnose.
    7
    1,567 npm
    1,278 PyPI
    30
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Diffgate MCP server acts as a code review engine, enabling AI coding agents to analyze and validate code diffs before application. It enhances AI workflows by providing self-checking capabilities to optimise and secure code changes.
    7
    66 npm
    5
    Apache 2.0