zen_workflows
List available workflows from the ZenLink bridge workflow directory.
Instructions
List available named ZenLink workflows from the bridge workflow directory.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List available workflows from the ZenLink bridge workflow directory.
List available named ZenLink workflows from the bridge workflow directory.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It discloses the source directory but omits behavioral traits like auth requirements, side effects, or output format. Incomplete for a tool with no annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, 12 words, no extraneous information. Front-loaded with the verb and key details. Highly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no input/output schemas and no annotations, the description provides the basic purpose but doesn't clarify the return format or prerequisites. For a simple list tool, it's minimally adequate but could be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline is 4. The description adds context about 'named' workflows and the 'bridge workflow directory', which is helpful beyond the empty schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists available named ZenLink workflows from a specific directory, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like zen_workflow (singular).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no exclusions or context provided. The description only states the action without usage recommendations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/JayQuan-McCleary/ZenLink-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server