odoo_project_create_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the behavioral burden. It only states the create action and offers no information about permissions, side effects, reversibility, or failure behavior. Like a bare 'create' statement, it leaves the write operation under-specified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded: purpose first, then a short usage note, then a clean Args list. Every sentence earns its place and no filler is present.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers all six parameters with enough semantics for correct invocation, and the output schema exists for return value details. It is slightly incomplete only in behavioral areas such as permissions and failure handling, but for a create task tool this is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description fully compensates by explaining each parameter's meaning, including the required name, project_id usage, responsible user semantics, deadline format (YYYY-MM-DD), and priority values ('0'/'1', default '0'). This adds substantial value beyond the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description starts with a specific verb and resource: 'Crea una tarea (project.task) dentro de un proyecto Odoo.' This clearly identifies the action and target model, and the create orientation distinguishes it from the sibling odoo_project_update_task.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides a clear use case: 'Útil para que una tarea programada de Cowork registre trabajo pendiente directamente en Odoo.' This tells the agent when the tool is relevant, though it does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.