sap-abap-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to sap-abap-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with SAP GUI for Windows through the SAP GUI Scripting API.6035MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects AI assistants to SAP systems via the ADT REST API, enabling read, write, syntax-check, and activation of ABAP code directly from the chat.3MIT
- FlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with SAP systems via the ABAP Development Tools (ADT) REST API. It allows users to read ABAP source code, inspect DDIC objects, and execute SQL queries directly.66-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA local MCP server that connects to SAP ABAP systems via ADT HTTP API, enabling AI assistants to search, read, and manage ABAP objects securely without SAP GUI.5214 npm5MIT

dassian-adtofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for SAP ABAP development via the ADT API. Connect AI assistants to your SAP system — read, write, test, and deploy ABAP code without SAP GUI.10MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for SAP ABAP development, enabling AI assistants to read, create, update, and delete ABAP objects via ADT APIs.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Several tools have fuzzy boundaries: sap_se16_browse and sap_rfc_read_table both read table data, while sap_navigate, sap_execute_command, and sap_get_page all retrieve rendered SAP pages and can be used to reach transactions. An agent would need to read descriptions very carefully to reliably pick the right tool.
All tools share a sap_ prefix and snake_case style, which helps, but the internal pattern is inconsistent: sap_navigate is a bare verb, sap_se16_browse leads with a transaction code, and sap_rfc_read_table mixes technical context with the action. It is readable but not a uniform verb_noun convention.
Seven tools is a reasonable size for an SAP interaction server and not bloated overall. However, the set could be tightened because some tools are near-duplicates in functionality, such as the two table-reading paths and the multiple page-fetching mechanisms.
Core workflows like login, navigation, table reads, and running reports are covered, but there is no logout or explicit session-management tool, and report output is only exposed as raw page text. Agents can work around some gaps via execute_command or get_page, but the surface is not fully lifecycle-complete.