Skip to main content
Glama
JaxonDigital

Optimizely DXP MCP Server

by JaxonDigital

stop_monitoring

Stop background deployment monitoring in Optimizely DXP to halt automatic polling and retrieve final deployment status. Use when deployment completes or manual monitoring is preferred.

Instructions

🛑 Stop background monitoring for deployment. INSTANT: <1s. Stops polling immediately and returns final deployment status at time of stop. Monitor is removed from active monitors list. Use when deployment completes or when manual monitoring is preferred. Required: monitorId. Returns final deployment status and monitor summary.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
deploymentIdNo
allNo

Implementation Reference

  • Helper method to stop background monitoring for a specific database export monitor. This is likely used by the stop_monitoring tool to stop active database export monitors.
    static stopBackgroundMonitoring(exportId: string): boolean {
        const monitor = this.backgroundMonitors.get(exportId);
        if (monitor) {
            if (monitor.intervalId) {
                clearInterval(monitor.intervalId);
            }
            this.backgroundMonitors.delete(exportId);
            OutputLogger.info(`Stopped background monitoring for export ${exportId}`);
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }
  • Class method to stop monitoring for a specific deployment monitor ID.
    stopMonitoring(monitorId: string): boolean {
        const monitor = this.monitors.get(monitorId);
        if (!monitor) {
            return false;
        }
    
        // Clear timer
        if (monitor.timer) {
            clearTimeout(monitor.timer);
            monitor.timer = null;
        }
    
        // Mark as inactive
        monitor.isActive = false;
        this.stats.activeMonitors--;
        this.stats.completedMonitors++;
    
        if (this.options.debug) {
            console.error(`Stopped monitoring deployment ${monitor.deploymentId}`);
        }
    
        // Emit stop event
        this.emit('monitorStopped', {
            monitorId,
            deploymentId: monitor.deploymentId,
            projectId: monitor.projectId,
            duration: Date.now() - monitor.startTime,
            updateCount: monitor.updateCount
        });
    
        // Remove from active monitors after a delay (keep for stats)
        setTimeout(() => {
            this.monitors.delete(monitorId);
        }, 60000); // Keep for 1 minute
    
        return true;
    }
  • Method to stop telemetry health monitoring intervals.
    stopMonitoring(): void {
        if (this.healthTimers.endpoint) {
            clearInterval(this.healthTimers.endpoint);
            this.healthTimers.endpoint = null;
        }
    
        if (this.healthTimers.system) {
            clearInterval(this.healthTimers.system);
            this.healthTimers.system = null;
        }
    
        // Save final health state
        this.saveHealthState();
    
        if (process.env.DEBUG || process.env.TELEMETRY_DEBUG) {
            console.error('[TELEMETRY HEALTH] Stopped health monitoring');
        }
    }
  • Registration/availability entry for the stop_monitoring tool in the tool availability matrix.
    'stop_monitoring': {
        hostingTypes: ['dxp-paas', 'dxp-saas', 'self-hosted', 'unknown'],
        category: 'Monitoring',
        description: 'Stop monitoring'
    },
  • Documentation/reference to the stop_monitoring tool in list of available monitoring commands.
    response.push('• `stop_monitoring` - Stop active monitors');
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It effectively describes key behaviors: the action is instantaneous (<1s), it stops polling immediately, returns final deployment status, and removes the monitor from the active list. However, it doesn't mention potential side effects like whether this affects other monitoring processes or if the action is reversible, leaving some gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is efficiently structured with key information front-loaded: the action, speed, immediate effect, and return value. Every sentence adds value—none are redundant. The use of emoji and formatting (INSTANT: <1s) enhances readability without wasting space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 2 parameters, 0% schema coverage, no annotations, and no output schema, the description provides good behavioral context but falls short on parameter documentation. It mentions a 'monitorId' requirement that conflicts with the schema, creating inconsistency. While it covers the tool's purpose and usage well, the parameter confusion reduces overall completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 2 parameters (deploymentId, all) with 0% description coverage, meaning the schema provides no semantic information. The description only mentions 'Required: monitorId' (which doesn't match the schema parameters), creating confusion rather than adding meaningful context. This fails to compensate for the schema's lack of documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('Stop background monitoring for deployment') and resource ('deployment'), distinguishing it from siblings like 'list_monitors' or 'get_deployment_status'. It uses a precise verb ('Stop') and specifies the scope ('background monitoring'), making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use this tool ('when deployment completes or when manual monitoring is preferred') and provides context on its effect ('Monitor is removed from active monitors list'). This gives clear guidance on appropriate scenarios, helping the agent choose between this and alternatives like 'get_deployment_status' or 'list_monitors'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/JaxonDigital/optimizely-dxp-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server