Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-bitbucket

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Atlassian Bitbucket Server / Data Center, providing 66 tools for managing projects, repositories, branches, files, commits, pull requests, and code search with opt-in deletion operations.
      57
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for interacting with the Bitbucket API, supporting both Bitbucket Cloud and Bitbucket Server, enabling pull request, branch, file, code review, and search operations.
      19
      4,121 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for Bitbucket integration, providing 27 tools to manage repositories, pull requests, branches, commits, issues, and workspaces.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bitbucket Cloud that exposes 35 tools covering repositories, pull requests, branching models, and pipelines, enabling AI clients to automate Bitbucket workflows.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Bitbucket Cloud REST API v2.0, providing 32 tools across 5 toolsets for repository management, pull requests, issues, pipelines, and more with safety controls and LLM-optimized output.
      33
      14 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bitbucket Server integration, enabling project, repository, pull request, source code, branch, and code review operations via the Bitbucket Server APIs.
      27
      12 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 58 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific resources and actions, such as pull requests, branches, pipelines, and permissions. However, some tools like 'get_commit' and 'list_commits' or 'get_branch' and 'list_branches' have overlapping retrieval functions that could cause minor confusion, though their descriptions clarify the single vs. list distinction.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, using snake_case uniformly. Examples include 'create_pull_request', 'list_branches', 'delete_webhook', and 'update_user_permission', making the set predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 58 tools, the count is excessive for a single server, likely overwhelming for agents. While the domain (Bitbucket API) is broad, this many tools suggests poor scoping, as many could be consolidated or omitted without losing functionality, leading to potential confusion and inefficiency.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage of the Bitbucket domain, including full CRUD operations for repositories, pull requests, branches, tags, pipelines, permissions, webhooks, and more. There are no obvious gaps; agents can perform end-to-end workflows without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues