Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-bitbucket

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Atlassian Bitbucket Server / Data Center, providing 66 tools for managing projects, repositories, branches, files, commits, pull requests, and code search with opt-in deletion operations.
      57
      137 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for interacting with the Bitbucket API, supporting both Bitbucket Cloud and Bitbucket Server, enabling pull request, branch, file, code review, and search operations.
      19
      11,347 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for Bitbucket integration, providing 27 tools to manage repositories, pull requests, branches, commits, issues, and workspaces.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bitbucket Cloud that exposes 35 tools covering repositories, pull requests, branching models, and pipelines, enabling AI clients to automate Bitbucket workflows.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Bitbucket Cloud REST API v2.0, providing 32 tools across 5 toolsets for repository management, pull requests, issues, pipelines, and more with safety controls and LLM-optimized output.
      33
      13 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bitbucket Server integration, enabling project, repository, pull request, source code, branch, and code review operations via the Bitbucket Server APIs.
      27
      768 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 62 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources and actions (repositories, PRs, pipelines, permissions, webhooks, tags, branches). A few adjacent commit/file-history tools and pipeline status/log tools require reading descriptions carefully, but overall boundaries are clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names overwhelmingly follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern such as list_repositories, get_commit, create_pull_request, and delete_webhook. The main inconsistency is mixing 'pr' abbreviations (approve_pr, get_pr_diff) with 'pull_request' forms (create_pull_request, list_pull_requests).

    Tool Count2/5

    With 62 tools, the surface is very heavy for a single MCP server and exceeds the range where an agent can easily scan and choose tools. While the breadth reflects Bitbucket's API, the set could likely be consolidated into fewer operation groups.

    Completeness3/5

    Coverage is strong in several areas: repositories, PR review/merge actions, pipeline variables, webhooks, tags, and permissions have near-complete lifecycles. However, notable gaps remain, including branch creation/deletion, file write/update operations, project write operations, and PR metadata updates.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues