Skip to main content
Glama
Javendean

site-kit

by Javendean
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to site-kit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • slop-scorer

      Yuve21
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to identify machine-generated template tells in codebases and rendered web pages, with citable evidence and exact fixes for each finding, and to read prevention rules before generating content.
      MIT

    • DS4AI MCP

      Polymathie-Studio
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to audit web surfaces for conformance and generate findability and delivery metadata, including meta tags, JSON-LD, sitemaps, robots.txt, image markup, and contrast-checked palettes, with provenance-stamped results.
      11
      8 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-a11y

      P4ST4S
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables auditing web pages for WCAG violations, applying deterministic fixes and PRs, all through MCP clients like Claude Desktop.
      7
      MIT

    • creative-lemon

      a-saeedia
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to design and critique websites using 2026 trend reports, motion code recipes, design principles, palettes, type systems, section skeletons, references, and DESIGN.md tokens, with performance and reduced-motion handling built in.
      9
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tool families are well separated by target, and each checker addresses a distinct concern. The only real overlap is between check_copy and check_honesty, both of which claim some honesty/attribution territory, and review_site naturally overlaps with the individual checkers. The detailed descriptions make selection feasible, so this is not a serious weakness.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    There is a strong check_* family and a clear palette_from_* pair, but the set mixes verb-first names like review_site and explain_rule, noun phrases like learning_path and palette_from_subject, and a single bare verb in doctor. The names are all lowercase and readable, but the overall convention is mixed rather than uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is squarely in the well-scoped range for a site review and scaffolding kit. Each checker targets a separate concern, and the supporting tools for explanation, learning, scaffolding, palette generation, and diagnostics all earn their place.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the full workflow: scaffold a site, generate palettes, run a full critique, run targeted checks, explain findings, and diagnose the environment. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations that would block an agent from completing a meaningful task.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources