delete_teams_channel_alias

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Delete' conveys destructiveness but does not state whether the operation is permanent, idempotent, or what happens to messages or aliases that reference the deleted alias.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no fluff or repeated schema information. Every word contributes to the definition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter deletion tool with no output schema, this is nearly sufficient, but without annotations it leaves important context unstated: permanence, error behavior for missing aliases, and relationship to saved/list alias tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the alias parameter beyond the tool's name and the word 'alias.' It does not specify the expected format (e.g., friendly name vs. ID) or how the alias is identified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Delete a saved Teams channel alias.' The action (delete) and noun (saved Teams channel alias) clearly set it apart from sibling tools like save_teams_channel_alias and list_teams_channel_aliases.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no explicit when-to-use guidance or alternatives. An agent must infer that this is for removing an alias; there is no mention of prerequisite, relation to graph_teams_message_alias, or consequences of deleting an in-use alias.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.