Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to hwp-live-safe

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and chat clients to directly edit an open Hancom Office 2022 document on Windows through MCP, providing paragraph, table, cell, chart, layout, and document-management tools with undo-safe operations and no overwriting of the original file.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables automation of Hancom HWP (Hanword) documents via MCP, including creating, editing, saving, and managing multiple document tabs.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive control of Hangul (HWP) documents through an MCP server, supporting operations from basic document management to advanced formatting, tables, images, and document structure manipulation.
      6
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI models to control Hancom Office Hanword (HWP) documents on Windows. It allows for the automated creation, editing, and management of Korean word processor files, including text formatting and table manipulation.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control Hancom's HWP/HWPX documents (Korean word processor) via COM interface on Windows, supporting creation, editing, formatting, and export.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The hwp_ foreground prefix cleanly separates the experimental foreground-typing flow from the normal HWP Live document flow, and each tool corresponds to a distinct lifecycle step. Some confusion is possible among the several preview/apply tools, but the descriptions and prefixes make the boundaries clear enough.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share the hwp_ prefix and snake_case, giving a coherent namespace, but the internal convention varies: verb-first names like read_context and apply_preview mix with noun-first names like profile_list and foreground_status. Some compound names such as preview_profile_insert and foreground_preview_profile_insert are awkward and not consistently verb_noun.

    Tool Count5/5

    15 tools is at the upper end of the well-scoped range, and each tool represents a distinct state transition or query for either the normal or foreground workflow. Despite the two parallel modes, no tool feels redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The core safe document workflow is well covered: start, read, preview, apply, and undo, plus experimental foreground operations and profile-value insertion. Obvious gaps like saving or closing documents and managing profile values are absent, but the safety-focused design appears to intentionally exclude them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive