Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
JasonOracle

agnes-2.5-flash-mcp

by JasonOracle
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to agnes-2.5-flash-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Image Gen MCP

      s4shibam
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Generate images with OpenAI and Google Gemini directly from any MCP client, saving assets into your project with batch support and explicit file output.
      2
      41 npm
      MIT

    • DreamLayer image tools

      TheDesignFounder
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Image tools for coding agents: generate from text, edit one reference image, remove backgrounds, upscale 2x, and create reference-based sprite animations. The MCP server, CLI and REST API share one key, credit balance and request history. Needs a DreamLayer API key and paid credits; sprite sheets are beta.
      7
      77 npm
      MIT
    • PopNow MCP Server by popnow-ai

      PopNow MCP Serverofficial

      popnow-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, VS Code and other MCP clients to create and edit AI images, videos, songs and voiceovers from plain-language requests, including background removal, upscaling, and effect videos. Connects as a hosted remote server with OAuth 2.1 or API key sign-in, quotes credit prices before generating, and returns results directly in the chat.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    query_video and generate_image are clearly distinct, but create_video and generate_video describe the same core operation with different execution modes. The descriptions help differentiate them, but an agent could still easily pick the wrong one.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern, but the verbs are inconsistent: query, generate, create, generate. The create_video vs generate_video pair is especially confusing since they are near-synonyms for the same capability.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a reasonable size for an image/video generation server. The only slight issue is that generate_video is a redundant sync variant of create_video, but it serves a compatibility purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The core image generation and video creation lifecycles are covered: generate image, create video asynchronously, query status, and sync wait. Minor gaps like cancellation or image task polling are not blocking for the apparent domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources