Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to s3-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with AWS S3 through MCP, supporting bucket and object management, lifecycle configurations, tagging, policies, CORS settings, presigned URLs, and file uploads/downloads.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to connect to AWS S3 buckets, list, upload, and read objects in various formats, supporting public and private buckets with multiple transport modes.
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to manage Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage through native B2 and S3-compatible tools, including bucket operations, file upload/download, key management, and presigned URLs.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to interact with any S3-compatible storage (AWS S3, LocalStack, MinIO) via MCP, providing tools like list, read, write, delete objects and buckets.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides tools for interacting with MinIO and S3-compatible object storage through MCP clients like Claude. It enables comprehensive bucket and object management, including listing, creating, uploading, and generating presigned URLs.
      13
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for AWS S3 and S3-compatible storage, enabling file upload, download, listing, deletion, and temporary remote file staging via natural language.
      BSD 3-Clause

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool maps to a distinct S3 operation: bucket listing/creation/deletion, object listing/read/metadata/write/delete/copy, and presigned URL generation for GET vs PUT. There is no functional overlap that would cause an agent to select the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_buckets, get_object, presign_put, create_bucket, etc.). The naming is predictable and consistent across the entire surface.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for an S3-focused server. Each tool covers a core operation without extraneous additions or redundant convenience wrappers.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers bucket lifecycle and object CRUD, including copying and presigned URLs, so common workflows are fully supported. Minor gaps exist around pagination for large object listings and advanced operations like multipart uploads, but these are not severe for typical usage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues