Skip to main content
Glama
JVCSampaio

Forgehand

by JVCSampaio
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Forgehand

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • cc-delegate

      EtienneLescot
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Delegates heavy development tasks from a supervisor to an autonomous worker on a cheaper model via MCP, with isolated git worktrees and provider-agnostic support.
      3
      1
      MIT

    • worker-bridge

      trollbot2012
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Delegate coding tasks to external AI coding agents in isolated git worktrees with independent verification, enabling any MCP client to orchestrate multi-agent workflows.
      5
      MIT

    • Strata Coder

      huyinghuan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables a primary coding agent to delegate bounded implementation and repair tasks to a local OpenAI-compatible model that edits a copy of the project, runs configured checks, and returns artifacts for review. Exposes stdio tools for capability discovery, task submission, progress polling, artifact reading, and cancellation.
      MIT

    • Jev Reflex

      EternitiesAi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to make small, bounded decisions around tasks via stdio MCP, supporting source-bound context, durable budgets, bulk jobs, and measured outcomes while leaving planning and reasoning with the main model.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: health reports status, delegate starts execution, tasks lists receipts, and result retrieves one receipt by ID. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use the same forgehand_ prefix and snake_case style, but the second segment is inconsistent in form: delegate is a verb while health, tasks, and result are nouns. The pattern is still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a focused task-execution server. The set covers status, submission, listing, and retrieval without unnecessary extras or obvious bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The core submit-to-retrieve workflow is covered along with health/status, but there is no cancellation tool, and repository registration appears to be a prerequisite handled outside the MCP surface. These are minor gaps for a one-shot task runner.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources