Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
JSkier21

notesearch-mcp

by JSkier21
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to notesearch-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • secondbrain-mcp

      qingleiw
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to list, search, read, and append to Markdown notes through MCP tool calls, making it easy to interact with a second brain folder.
      -

    • dewey-search

      micke-berg
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides hybrid search (BM25 + vector) and staleness reporting for local markdown notes, exposing search and indexing tools to AI assistants via MCP.
      6 npm
      MIT

    • second-brain-mcp

      nanthansr
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search and read notes from an Obsidian or markdown vault through four governed tools, with enforced read-only access, a page budget, and path sandboxing.
      4
      8 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Brain MCP

      Artur0927
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables hybrid dense and BM25 search over a markdown vault, with tools for reading, writing, grepping, and managing notes through any MCP-compatible client.
      12
      MIT

    • docs-search-mcp

      JuanMiguelAbellan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to search and read a folder of Markdown/text documents via a read-only MCP server with hybrid BM25 and local embedding search, treating the calling model as untrusted.
      11 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are complementary and non-overlapping: search_notes locates notes by meaning/keyword, and read_note opens one specific note by filename. Descriptions explicitly state the handoff between them (search first, then read the whole note).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both names follow the same verb_noun snake_case convention (search_notes, read_note). The pattern is predictable and self-documenting.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side for even a narrow server. It covers the search-and-open flow, but there is no room for supporting operations like listing or browsing notes.

    Completeness3/5

    Retrieval is covered end-to-end (find then read), but the memory domain has a notable gap: there is no way to create, update, or list notes, so an agent cannot persist or enumerate memories. It is workable if notes are written by other means, but the surface feels partial.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources