Skip to main content
Glama
JONASXZB

mcp-minis

by JONASXZB
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-minis

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • svipall

      ilien-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that lets AI agents read any webpage as clean Markdown, crawl whole sites within configured limits, search without API keys, and solve supported captchas locally — all without cloud services or third-party keys.
      30
      15
      AGPL 3.0

    • Combined MCP Server

      SMH01-MOD-NEXT
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that gives AI agents controlled access to a machine: filesystem, shell, background processes, git, web fetching and persistent key-value memory.
      GPL 3.0

    • Agent Toolbox

      Vincentwei1021
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Production-ready MCP server for AI agents — web search, content extraction, screenshots, weather, finance, email validation, translation, and IP geolocation.
      11 npm
      6
      MIT
    • Recall by RecallWorks

      Recallofficial

      RecallWorks
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP memory server for AI agents — persistent, searchable, tiered memory across sessions. Works over stdio (Cursor, Claude Desktop) or HTTP+SSE. MIT licensed.
      8
      MIT

    • webpage-mcp

      Vl4dimirz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A zero-config MCP server that lets AI agents fetch, read, and search live web pages without API keys or databases, using in-process BM25 retrieval.
      71 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct operation: save_note creates, get_note retrieves by ID, list_notes and search_notes offer different retrieval modes (browse vs full-text query), update_note modifies, and delete_note removes. There is no meaningful overlap; an agent can easily choose the right tool based on intent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_note, save_note, list_notes, delete_note, update_note, search_notes. The one variation save_note vs a hypothetical create_note is semantically clear and conventional for note vaults.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools provide exactly the operations needed for a note vault without bloat: create/read/update/delete plus listing and search. Each tool earns its place and the set is well-scoped for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers full CRUD lifecycle (save, get, update, delete) along with two complementary retrieval methods (list and full-text search). No obvious gaps for a note-taking server; even edge cases like empty updates and clearing tags are addressed in descriptions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources