approval_deny
Deny a pending approval request by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Deny a pending request by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Approval request ID |
Deny a pending approval request by providing its unique ID.
Deny a pending request by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Approval request ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description only states the action. Lacks disclosure of side effects, authorization needs, or state changes beyond 'deny'.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundancy, efficient for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for basic understanding but omits potential error conditions, required permissions, or outcome feedback. No output schema to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with parameter 'id' described. Description adds 'by ID' but doesn't clarify format or constraints beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states action (deny) and resource (pending request by ID). Distinguishes from sibling tools approval_approve and approval_list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies usage for denying requests but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like approval_approve.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/JNZader/mcp-llm-bridge'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server