Skip to main content
Glama
J-X0
by J-X0

Related Servers

Alternatives to safety

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a secure MCP boundary for AI agents, intercepting and validating tool calls, redacting secrets, and requiring human approval for sensitive actions with a tamper-evident audit trail.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Screens text for PHI/PII, classifies it, redacts sensitive content, and routes it to approved model tiers based on a declarative policy, with built-in evaluation metrics.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Stateless enterprise policy firewall & token-cost proxy for MCP. It enforces identity, policy, and budget on every tool call.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a pre-flight/post-flight firewall for LLM calls with comprehensive detection, classification, policy enforcement, reversible redaction, output safety, and immutable audit logging.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables sub-millisecond pre-execution safety filtering for AI agent tool calls, blocking destructive shell commands, dangerous SQL mutations, credential access, SSRF, and scope-creep or prompt-injection patterns before they execute, with optional fail-closed transparent proxy wrapping for any MCP server.
      6
      334 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables secure interoperability between LLM agents and MCP tool servers by sanitizing requests and responses, masking sensitive tokens, detecting PII, and performing server reputation scans.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'screen' is a clear, action-oriented verb and introduces no naming inconsistencies.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single screening tool feels thin for a 'safety' server, though it does cover a core classification action.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers the main screening/classification task, but lacks related operations such as policy management or decision history, leaving notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues