Skip to main content
Glama
J-MaFf

s2-netbox-mcp

by J-MaFf

Related Servers

Alternatives to s2-netbox-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to create, read, update, and delete NetBox resources such as sites, networks, VLANs, IP addresses, devices, interfaces, cables, and VMs through generic CRUD and convenience tools, with automatic name/slug resolution and optional read-only or API-key protection.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for governed multi-vendor network device operations, including configuration management (backup, diff, merge, replace, rollback) and read-only queries (facts, interfaces, BGP, LLDP, ARP) via NAPALM, with optional NetBox source-of-truth integration.
      33
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to connect to Authentik and securely query users, groups, applications, events, and system status, with an optional gated tool to enable or disable user accounts.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read and manage NetBox network infrastructure data via MCP. Supports querying all object types, search, changelogs, GraphQL, IP/prefix/VLAN allocation, cable tracing, config rendering, and write operations with safety modes.
      18
      148 PyPI
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 51 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct by resource and action, and singular/plural pairs follow a predictable pattern. Portal-related tools (get_portals, find_portals, get_portal_statuses, get_portal_groups) and history tools could momentarily overlap, but the detailed descriptions resolve boundaries clearly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Naming is predominantly a consistent snake_case get_* pattern, with minor deviations like list_events, search_person_data, find_portals, check_connection, and ping_app. These deviations are readable and clearly signal the tool's special behavior.

    Tool Count1/5

    At 51 tools, the surface far exceeds the typical 3-15 well-scoped range and crosses the rubric's 50+ extreme-mismatch threshold. Even though each tool maps to a distinct API endpoint, the sheer count imposes a heavy selection burden on agents.

    Completeness2/5

    The toolset is entirely read-only, with no create, update, or delete operations for the access-control domain. Read coverage is broad, but the absence of lifecycle write operations (e.g., setting unlock windows, granting access) is a significant gap that will block management tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive