Code Scanner Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Code Scanner Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server that transforms code repositories from GitHub, GitLab, or local directories into LLM-friendly formats, preserving context and structure for better AI processing.311Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceUniversal MCP server that analyzes any codebase and provides structured context to AI assistants. Dynamic, accurate, and token-efficient.187 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides ultra-efficient code exploration through AST analysis, reducing LLM token usage by up to 95% while enabling instant call graph generation and dependency analysis for massive codebases.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that indexes your codebase using tree-sitter AST parsing and gives AI tools instant access to structural intelligence like dependency graphs, call trees, and dead code detection from a local SQLite database.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that analyzes codebases to provide dependency graphs, impact analysis, and file insights across 15+ programming languages, enabling AI assistants to understand project structure and navigate code efficiently.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that transforms codebases into intelligent, queryable knowledge bases, enabling AI assistants to perform semantic search, explore architecture, and analyze code relationships.167-
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool 'scan_code' has a clear, distinct purpose focused on scanning code files and listing definitions, making it impossible for an agent to misselect between non-existent alternatives.
The single tool name 'scan_code' follows a verb_noun pattern, which is consistent and predictable. Since there is only one tool, there are no deviations or mixed conventions to evaluate, resulting in perfect naming consistency.
A single tool is too few for a server named 'Code Scanner Server', which implies a broader scope of code analysis operations. While 'scan_code' is comprehensive, the lack of additional tools (e.g., for filtering results, analyzing specific file types, or managing scans) makes the set feel thin and underdeveloped for the apparent domain.
The tool set is severely incomplete for a code scanning domain. It covers scanning and listing definitions but lacks essential operations such as filtering results, analyzing code quality, detecting vulnerabilities, or integrating with version control. This creates significant gaps that will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform comprehensive code analysis tasks.