Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to loci

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP hosts to query a local second brain built from scattered notes, docs, PDFs, and chat logs, with hybrid vector/BM25 retrieval and section-level citations.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that lets AI hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Cline query a hybrid vector + BM25 index of your scattered notes, project docs, PDFs, and chat exports, returning answers with section-level citations. It exposes eight tools, resources, and prompts so agents can search, ask, and walk links across all your source directories at once.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP hosts to query a local, queryable second brain over scattered notes and docs using hybrid vector plus BM25 retrieval with section-level citations, resources, and prompts.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query a local, hybrid-searchable second brain over scattered notes, documents, and chat logs with section-level citations. It exposes retrieval tools, resources, and prompts through MCP so hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Cline can use the indexed knowledge.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to search, ask, and retrieve section-level cited answers from a local hybrid index over scattered notes, documents, and chat logs.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for local RAG over personal notes, PDFs, and documents, enabling plain-English querying and hybrid search with multi-hop context expansion.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct actions (ingest, search, ask, remember, forget, stats, wiki), and the descriptions explicitly disambiguate the search-vs-ask and graph-vs-links pairs. The remaining mild overlap is between brain_graph and brain_links (both graph exploration) and the somewhat vague brain_harness, but guidance is clear enough to select correctly.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses a uniform brain_ + single-verb/noun pattern (brain_search, brain_ask, brain_remember, brain_forget, brain_ingest, etc.). No casing or verb-style deviations, making the set highly predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the ideal range and each earns its place: ingest, search, ask, remember, forget, stats, wiki, graph, links, and harness cover distinct capabilities. Nothing feels padded or missing at the count level.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full memory lifecycle: index (ingest), create (remember), read (search/ask), delete (forget), plus stats, wiki consolidation, and graph exploration. Minor gap: no explicit update/edit operation for an existing memory note (though remember can effectively overwrite), and no delete for generated wiki pages.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues