Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to jira-mcp-ai

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server for self-hosted Jira Server, exposing REST API v2 tools for search, issue creation/update, transitions, comments, and more to AI clients via MCP protocol.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects AI assistants to your Jira site, supporting PAT or SSO authentication for search, read, create, update, and delete operations on issues.
      17
      45 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-only MCP server providing safe, typed Jira tools for AI agents via Atlassian ACLI, enabling search, get issue, add comment, and transition issues with policy guardrails.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides AI assistants with access to Jira Cloud for issue management, search, and workflow operations.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An async MCP server for JIRA integration, enabling AI assistants to search, create, and manage JIRA issues via JQL and other operations.
      6
      2
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 52 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool maps to a distinct resource/action pair, and the verbose descriptions actively disambiguate near-neighbors: jira_get_sprint_issues is scoped by sprint, jira_search by JQL, and jira_get_create_meta is separated from jira_list_fields by focusing on the create screen. Overlap exists only where Jira itself exposes similar concepts, and the descriptions handle it.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All 52 tools use the jira_ prefix and snake_case, and most follow a clear verb_noun pattern: get_issue, list_sprnts, create_component, delete_worklog. The exceptions—jira_search, jira_count, and jira_capabilities—deviate slightly from that pattern, but the overall convention is highly predictable.

    Tool Count1/5

    52 tools is an extreme surface for one MCP server, crossing the rubric's 50+ threshold. Even though Jira is a broad domain, the sheer number of resource/action pairs makes selection heavy and increases the chance of mispicks.

    Completeness4/5

    The core issue lifecycle is well covered: create, get, update, delete, transition, assign, link, comments, worklogs, attachments, watchers, votes, and sprint management. Gaps like no component/version delete, no filter create/update/delete, and no worklog update are present but mostly affect secondary workflow edges rather than blocking primary use.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues