A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceEnables MCP-aware agents to drive Modal serverless compute, including GPU workers and headless Chromium for web browsing with screenshots.
MIT
Modal MCP Server
by IsaiahDupree
Related Servers
Alternatives to Modal MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI agents to Modal.com infrastructure, allowing management of deployments, apps, containers, volumes, secrets, and environments via MCP tools.30-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to interact with Modal, allowing them to deploy apps and run functions in a serverless cloud environment.73MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to drive a self-hosted video toolkit through MCP tools, including lipsync, face restoration, ffmpeg operations, and metadata retrieval.1Do What The F*ck You Want To Public
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP tools for video transcoding, document conversion, and multi-step pipelines — callable by any AI agent.12253 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceExposes LangChain and Anthropic Claude capabilities as tools for generating production-ready RAG systems, Supabase vector stores, and document ingestion pipelines. It enables users to instantly scaffold AI infrastructure and document processing code through natural language prompts in MCP-compatible clients.-
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action without overlap: app listing, log retrieval, video rendering creation, render job retrieval, render job listing, and voice synthesis. The boundaries between video rendering, voice cloning, and general Modal app management are clearly demarcated.
Naming Consistency3/5
Mixed verb placement conventions: modal_apps and modal_logs imply actions (list/get) without suffixes, while modal_render_get and modal_render_list use explicit action suffixes. The base modal_render tool (create operation) lacks a suffix unlike its complementary tools, creating inconsistency within the render workflow cluster.
Tool Count5/5
Six tools is well-scoped for the server's apparent purpose covering Modal app monitoring, video rendering lifecycle management, and voice synthesis. The count hits the sweet spot for functionality without overwhelming the agent with redundant options.
Completeness3/5
Notable gaps in lifecycle coverage: apps only supports listing (missing get single app, deploy, delete), render jobs lack cancel/delete operations, and voice synthesis has no associated read/list functionality. The surface supports creation and partial reading but misses update/delete operations for persistent resources.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues