Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to stockonomy-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      SEC-filed financial statements back to 1985 for US-listed companies, plus global coverage, every number cited to its filing with an accession number. 59 tools for income statements, balance sheets, cash flow, growth rates, valuation (DCF, reverse DCF, comparables, fair-value range), SEC filing and earnings-call search, supply chains, 13F holders, options positioning and thesis monitoring.
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables deep analysis of SEC EDGAR filings through universal company search, document content extraction, and advanced filing search capabilities. Provides AI-ready access to business descriptions, risk factors, financial statements, and full-text search across any public company's SEC documents.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify factual claims against hosted web search with provenance-tracked evidence, tiered pricing, and signed receipts. Offers quick, standard, deep, and research-grade verification through paid MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform variance analysis, generate reconciling driver bridges and three-statement forecasts, export Excel workbooks, and analyze SEC or private-company financial data locally with engine-verified calculations.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    check_claims and check_figure_free both verify a stated figure against SEC filings, differing mainly in bulk (20 vs 1), auth, and receipt-writing, so an agent could easily pick the wrong one. Similarly, point_in_time (recast=true), pit_changes (restated), and recasts_free all surface restated/changed values, creating conceptual overlap that takes careful reading to separate.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    There are partial families (check_claims/check_figure_free, pit_changes/pit_fields) and a recurring _free suffix, which helps. But point_in_time breaks the pit_ prefix convention, and the set mixes verb_noun (check_claims) with noun/noun_phrase styles (point_in_time, recasts_free), so no single predictable pattern holds throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for the SEC-filings domain, with each tool mapping to a distinct capability (verification, point-in-time query, changefeed, dictionary, recast detection). No obvious redundancy in count or missing slots that warrant more tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers claim verification, point-in-time figures, a daily change feed, a data dictionary, and recast detection, which is strong lifecycle coverage for this domain. Minor gaps remain: no tool to discover supported filers/tickers or to fetch the underlying filing text/document referenced by the verdicts.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues